GOP Audience Demands Ron Paul Answers Abortion Question
Ron Paul clarifies that he would not allow for government funding of abortion or contraception, which would mean (for Paul) taking away government funding of many various medical facilities and institutions. [via Mediaite]
Ron Paul clarifies that he would not allow for government funding of abortion or contraception, which would mean (for Paul) taking away government funding of many various medical facilities and institutions. [via Mediaite]
Just as it is a womans right to choose her own destiny
it is the taxpayers right NOT to fund her choices
if her choices go against their beliefs.
The simple spolutiion is for the govt to get out of everyones
personal lives leaving the States CHOICE to fund or
nor fund abortions and if so at what time.
When govts and religious STOP teaching impossible
sex education and get real in showing youth and
those who come from less educated backgrounds/nations
what prevention is and how it works and MAKE IT
AVAILABLE for any who wish to avail themselves
of any preventive measures that is allowing CHOICE
to those who HAVE NONE due to the STATUS QUO
insisting on making unwanted babies and showing
famous weatlhy women who have all the assisstance
they want displaying the now prevalent "baby bump"
No I am NOT against women having babies, but not
women/girls who have no grasp of the results of
disreagrd of NATURAL LAW ot those women who
discover their financial supports have fallen thru the
subway grate and their apt has been confiscated
for use by the landlord and their Elderly parent
now needs full time care they cannot pay for
and a Midwifes basketfull of other nasty glitches
that can hit a women in her uterus making it
a life destroying for her and her oncoming baby to
carry to term.
Govt has its own agenda, always
It is in this current era that all women MUST get
pregnant and show off a "baby bump" as a fashion
statement while keeping those same females ignorant
fo the huge costs emotionally and ability to have any
more control over her life permanently.
IF this STATUS QUO in every nation gets its way all
women everywhere will remain the suppliers of fodder
for the perpetual WARS for the profits of the managers
of all govts everywhere.
The way up and out of this iron vise pressing down
on womens bodies and Souls is for women to organize
LOCAL CLINICS under a legal entity that allows education
of females of all ages and provisions of various preventives
and classes for MALES to bring in their sons and nephews
to be educated in RESPECT for all females and the sex act
and what results from disregard for NATUREs Laws.
In our past WOMEN were the teachers of males of all ages
on NATURAL LAW and males must NOW don that robe in
our LOCAL communities after a womens clinic seminar on
birth control for males as well as females and the uses of such.
Its past time for LOCAL OWNERSHIP of sex education
and MALE responsibility iin changing the attitudes of all youth
boys AND girls.
Ron Paul holds opinions on abortion not to my liking
Other that that he is the best CHOICE to lead this nation
out of perpetual wars and welfare for foreign nations
and honest govt.
His stance that abortin is NOT the biz of the federal govt
is timely in that it will FORCE LOCAL communities to
develope the best CHOICE for their own populace
WOMEN and rational MEN now step out and
create a learning porcess to educate those who need
an attitude adjustment about sex and birth control as well
as the opportunity for the TEACHERS to expand their views
and teaching tools
A President DR.Ron Paul would be pro setting up
educational clinics for women and sex education.
His own compassion would be stirred to work to eliminate
all those UNWANTED pregnancies
Looks to me like a win/win solution.
Ron Paul
2012
and does NOT deserve to be President of the United States. I voted against him when I lived in his district, and I'll continue to vote against him until he admits his sexism, racism and homophobia, agrees to make amends, and does so publicly.
Just as it is a womans right to choose her own destiny
it is the taxpayers right NOT to fund her choices
if her choices go against their beliefs.
Yes, the taxpayers can leave the country (and stop paying taxes, woohoo!) if they don't like it.
The simple spolutiion is for the govt to get out of everyones
personal lives leaving the States CHOICE to fund or
nor fund abortions and if so at what time.
That sounds like a pretty big intrusion into people's lives to me.
When govts and religious STOP teaching impossible
sex education and get real in showing youth and
those who come from less educated backgrounds/nations
what prevention
Yeah, we don't like abstinence-only sex ed, either. Too bad a lot of "religious" do.
Govt has its own agenda, always
It is in this current era that all women MUST get
pregnant and show off a "baby bump" as a fashion
statement while keeping those same females ignorant
fo the huge costs emotionally and ability to have any
more control over her life permanently.
That seems to be the agenda of the anti-choicers, actually. And yours, too.
IF this STATUS QUO in every nation gets its way all
women everywhere will remain the suppliers of fodder
for the perpetual WARS for the profits of the managers
of all govts everywhere.
Why do you presume this is the status quo in every nation? Have you ever been to the Scandinavian countries?
The way up and out of this iron vise pressing down
on womens bodies and Souls is for women to organize
LOCAL CLINICS under a legal entity that allows education
of females of all ages and provisions of various preventives
and classes for MALES to bring in their sons and nephews
to be educated in RESPECT for all females and the sex act
and what results from disregard for NATUREs Laws.
Sounds a bit like Planned Parenthood, except they tend not to give sex ed courses at clinic locations. Perhaps you're thinking of LOCAL SCHOOLS?
Its past time for LOCAL OWNERSHIP of sex education
and MALE responsibility iin changing the attitudes of all youth
boys AND girls.
What happens if this "LOCAL" sex education teaches women to be baby-producers for war, like you're worried about?
Ron Paul holds opinions on abortion not to my liking
Other that that he is the best CHOICE to lead this nation
out of perpetual wars and welfare for foreign nations
and honest govt.
Well, he's honestly misogynist, though I don't think that represents much progress.
His stance that abortin is NOT the biz of the federal govt
is timely in that it will FORCE LOCAL communities to
develope the best CHOICE for their own populace
WOMEN and rational MEN now step out and
create a learning porcess to educate those who need
an attitude adjustment about sex and birth control as well
as the opportunity for the TEACHERS to expand their views
and teaching tools
So if a "LOCAL" community decides that women are chattel and should have no say in what happens to their body... Mr. Paul is okay with this?
A President DR.Ron Paul would be pro setting up
educational clinics for women and sex education.
His own compassion would be stirred to work to eliminate
all those UNWANTED pregnancies
Looks to me like a win/win solution.
Unless, of course, a woman wants an abortion. Then she's SOL.
And that looks pretty win(for anti-choicers)/lose(for women) to me.
