RH Reality Check
Conservatives Define Debate on Supreme Court Pick
By Aaron Wiener, New Journalist Project
May 19, 2009 - 9:00am
So far, conservatives have defined the terms of the debate over the next Supreme Court nominee, while liberals have been left to defend against charges of coded language and hidden agendas.
Published under: Access to Abortion | Contraception | Maternal Health | Women’s Rights | judicial nominations | Obama Supreme Court | Supreme Court nomination
Cases the New Supreme Court Justice May Face
By Kay Steiger, RH Reality Check
May 18, 2009 - 8:00am
An important consideration related to who ultimately fills Souter's seat centers on what issues the Supreme Court would face in the near future.
Published under: Access to Abortion | Contraception | Maternal Health | Women’s Rights | judicial nominations | legal rights | Supreme Court
The Empathy Code: Judging, Judgment, and the Next Supreme Court Justice
By Sarah Seltzer, RH Reality Check
May 15, 2009 - 9:00am
Pro-reproductive justice philosophy is grounded in empathy -- the idea that we cannot judge another woman's choice unless we've walked a mile in her shoes.
Published under: Access to Abortion | Contraception | Maternal Health | Sexuality Education | STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention | Women’s Rights | Abortion Rights | anti-choice activists | empathy | judicial nominations | pro-choice movement | Supreme Court
As Supreme Court Nomination Speculation Heats Up, Keeping Our Eyes on the Bigger Prize
May 14, 2009 - 9:00am
A truly progressive legal culture - lines of legal interpretation which affirm free speech, privacy, civil liberties and protections of minority groups and views - requires building from the ground up, not just from the Supreme Court on down.
Published under: Access to Abortion | Contraception | Maternal Health | Sexuality Education | Women’s Rights | anti-choice activists | judicial nominations | Supreme Court | women's rights
The Public's Right to Know
May 13, 2009 - 9:00am
The public may never know whether Obama's Supreme Court nominee is committed to privacy rights because of the conspiracy of silence that governs judicial nominations.
Published under: Leading Voices | Access to Abortion | Contraception | STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention | Women’s Rights | judicial nominations | reproductive rights | right to privacy | Supreme Court

























