U.S. Submits Historic Human Rights Report to U.N., but Seriously Disappoints

Author image

by Michelle Movahed and Meredith Zingraff, Center for Reproductive Rights

August 24, 2010 - 6:00am (Print)

This week, for the first time, the United States submitted a report to the U.N. Human Rights Council, a rotating body of countries that peer-review U.N. member countries’ human rights records.  This submission is historic.  Where the Bush administration spent years criticizing the U.N. and human rights processes, in this report the Obama administration has stressed an end to U.S. human rights exceptionalism, quoting Hillary Clinton’s statement that “[h]uman rights are universal . . . .   That is why we are committed to “holding everyone to the same [human rights] standards, including ourselves.” 

But the euphoria wears off when you read the administration’s report. Once again, a U.S. administration has failed to take women’s reproductive rights seriously. U.N. human rights bodies have repeatedly criticized the U.S. on racial disparities in the availability of reproductive healthcare within the country and the barbaric practice of shackling incarcerated pregnant women during delivery. We raised these issues and the issue of discriminatory government policies that undermine women’s access to abortion with the State Department. But the only reference to reproductive health in the State Department report is a couple of sentences on the high cervical cancer rates in Hispanic women and rates of HIV and AIDS diagnoses.  

In order to make sure that the U.N. Human Rights Council doesn’t make the same mistake when it reviews the U.S. performance on human rights in November, the Center for Reproductive Rights, SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective, Rebecca Project for Human Rights, Law Students for Reproductive Justice, National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum, National Abortion Federation and Women on the Rise Telling HerStory submitted our own report to the Council. We focus on three key issues:

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH: First, women of color are considerably worse off than white women in every aspect of reproductive health. And the government’s continued failure to tackle these issues raises serious human rights concerns. Today, and for the last fifty years, African American women die in pregnancy or childbirth at a rate up to four times that of white women. Just two years ago, the committee that oversees countries’ compliance with the U.N. human rights treaty to eliminate racial discrimination criticized the U.S. for failing to adequately address the high incidence of maternal deaths to no avail.

In addition, women of color contract sexually transmitted infections at much higher rates than the majority white population. And while the overall unintended pregnancy rate has declined over the last fifteen years, it has remained consistently high among poor women of color.  The committee called on the U.S. government to take specific actions to eliminate these disparities, including by increasing access to contraception and sexuality education.  The causes of racial disparities are complex and systemic, and long-term interventions are likely needed to eradicate them, but the U.S. can—and should— do more to improve access to reproductive and sexual healthcare in the short term.   The U.S.’s report claims that healthcare reform will reduce racial disparities, but as we wait to see how healthcare reform will be implemented, the outcome is far from clear.  An important first step would be the inclusion of contraception in the list of benefits that insurance plans must contain, so that the barrier of out-of-pocket costs does not threaten women’s access to contraception.  

LACK OF ACCESS TO ABORTION: Second, the U.S. report is completely silent on the issue of women’s ability to obtain abortion.   Although abortion has been legal in the U.S. for almost forty years, the availability of abortion care has been dramatically reduced. Today 25 percent fewer abortion providers exist than they did in the 1990s. The threat of violence and an ongoing barrage of medically unnecessary restrictive laws severely limit existing doctors' ability to provide services.  And the shortage of providers makes it extremely difficult for women, especially poor and rural women, to access abortion, a legal medical service.  Policies restricting the use of Medicaid funds for abortions in most cases, even where necessary to protect a woman’s health, and restricting the way that private funds can be spent on health insurance coverage on the new exchanges narrow access even further. One of our clients, the owner of abortion clinics, testified to the State Department about abortion providers operating under a constant state of siege, legal and physical. In thirty years of providing services, she’s seen acid attacks, anthrax threats, picketing, and two suspicious fires that effect healthcare providers and ultimately harm patients, frequently preventing them from seeking routine healthcare.

SHACKLING PREGNANT INMATES: Finally, the U.S. report totally ignores the outrageous practice of shackling pregnant incarcerated women.  Pregnant women who are detained in U.S. prisons, jails, and immigration facilities continue to be shackled during transportation to medical appointments and while giving birth.  Human rights experts have expressed concern about this barbaric practice, and the treatment of detained women generally, calling on the government to prohibit the practice.  Disappointingly, while the U.S. report’s section on “dignity and incarceration” discusses the government’s efforts to address sexual assault in detention facilities, it doesn’t mention shackling.   

It’s now even more important that the U.N. Human Rights Council raises these issues on November 5, when it discusses the U.S. report with U.S. government representatives.  A woman’s right to make fundamental decisions about her life and her family, her right to access reproductive health services and her ability to decide when and whether to have children are strongly rooted in a number of fundamental human rights. And the U.S. government is obliged to respect, protect, and fulfill those rights.   

 

 

. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
30 comments
Please login or register to post and rate comments...
Comments are rated by readers on a scale from 1 to 5. Comments with a rating of 2 or less are hidden. Click on hidden comments to view them.
0
Kevin Rahe What's really going on here? August 24, 2010 - 10:25am

U.N. human rights bodies have repeatedly criticized the U.S. on racial disparities in the availability of reproductive healthcare within the country

 

Yes, there are racial disparities, but

 

First, women of color are considerably worse off than white women in every aspect of reproductive health.

 

Either this statement is incredibly misleading, or it is honest about the fact that abortion is not health care, for while African-American women represent only 13% of the female population, they have 36% of all the abortions, and while Hispanic/Latino women represent 14% of the female population, they have 22% of all the abortions.

0
Michelle Movahed Abortion is, in fact, an August 25, 2010 - 9:50am

Abortion is, in fact, an integral part of healthcare.  Human rights experts have repeatedly recognized as much -- access to safe abortion care is a fundamental component of a woman’s ability to exercise her right to health.  One need only look at the 20 million women around the world who resort to unsafe abortion every year when it’s unavailable and the millions that die or suffer from serious health complications as a result of unsafe abortion to understand the connections.  Racial disparities in rates of abortion track racial disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy, which reflect the broader issue of disparities in access to healthcare generally.  More information is available through the Guttmacher Institute and/or the Kaiser Family Foundation, both of whom have studied and written on this issue extensively.

0
squirrely girl A is only part of B August 25, 2010 - 11:48am

Abortion is included in reproductive healthcare but reproductive healthcare includes far more than just abortion. Or were you not concerned with pap smears, STD/STI testing, annual exams, prenatal and postnatal care, treatment for cancer, birth control, etc.?

0
Michelle Movahed I couldn't agree more that August 25, 2010 - 12:12pm

I couldn't agree more that reproductive healthcare is a broad topic that includes the different elements you mention as well as several others.   As noted in the body of the post, in our report to the Human Rights Council we raised issues of the persistence of racial disparities in reproductive healthcare generally, with specific attention to rates of maternal mortality, sexually transmitted infections, and unintended pregnancy. 

1
Kevin Rahe Abortion is rarely health care August 25, 2010 - 2:14pm

healthcare  : efforts made to maintain or restore health especially by trained and licensed professionals

 

While you haven't begun to explain the paradox exposed in my first comment, the fact is that abortion as it is practiced in the U.S. can rarely be considered health care, even in a more liberal sense of the term than I use.  It is obviously never health care for the baby, and it can only be considered health care for the mother if she has a condition where an unavoidable side effect of its treatment is the taking of her baby's life.  Only about 6% of abortions are sought for medical reasons, which includes not only conditions of the mother but also conditions of the baby (which obviously aren't a factor in the mother's health).

0
Arekushieru If abortion isn't health-care August 25, 2010 - 2:15pm

If abortion isn't health-care when the fetal or woman's life isn't endangered, then however one continues a pregnancy that isn't life-threatening also can't be considered health-care.  Why do you anti-choicers always display this disconnect and inability to see the other side of the coin?

1.5
BornIn1984 It is fairly hard to pass August 25, 2010 - 2:27pm
0
SaltyC Dishonesty August 25, 2010 - 2:37pm

Yah, Bei, Arekushieru is spot on. Most women don't have children for health reasons, yet obstetrics is considered healthcare for some reason.

 

the overwhelming percentage of abortions are not done for any reason related to the health of the mother

Provide evidence for this false assertion.

2
BornIn1984 Honestly August 25, 2010 - 3:11pm

Yah, Bei, Arekushieru is spot on. Most women don\'t have children for health reasons, yet obstetrics is considered healthcare for some reason.



Are you kidding me? Obstetrics deals specifically with the care for the woman and the child during pregnancy to, you know, make sure they are both in good health?

Provide evidence for this false assertion.



We have been over this before, but one more time cannot hurt.

Percentage distribution of women having an abortion, by their most important reason for having the abortion, 2004

Not ready for a(nother) child†/timing is wrong: 25%
Can’t afford a baby now: 23%
Have completed my childbearing/have other people depending on me/
children are grown: 19%
Don’t want to be a single mother/am having relationship problems: 8%
Don’t feel mature enough to raise a(nother) child/feel too young: 7%
Would interfere with education or career plans: 4%
Physical problem with my health: 4%
Possible problems affecting the health of the fetus: 3%
Was a victim of rape: <.05%
Husband or partner wants me to have an abortion: <.05%
Parents want me to have an abortion: <.05%
Don’t want people to know I had sex or got pregnant: <.05%
Other: 6%
Total: 100%


http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:3OXuTexJQEoJ:www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf+why+women+have+abortions+guttmacher&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiKSAmnQ-TLguZQwyDzpBCpGe5PD9LuN4ftTcm3IndnbhGuiYpnYzpDBIOLaNjXEQ2OJfz0a70CvKd1NhQe-ynbJCRXNiHYXwSVy-ijgVDzv2Wgku9SPL0SGl7HuA3KFXm_aOaP&sig=AHIEtbS8HCX23EvIKc0hVgyxd6adVUnihQ



Now start the excuses.

0
Arekushieru I see you haven't bothered to August 25, 2010 - 4:09pm

I see you haven't bothered to defend the actual point with your own excuses, though, eh, Born?  If abortion is not health care when not done for the health of the woman, then medical treatment for continuing pregnancy is not health care when not done for the health of the woman.  Whoops, again?

0
SaltyC So? August 25, 2010 - 9:34pm

Yeah I saw that before, it's a list of stated primary reasons not any reasons including the obvious fact that they don't want to remain pregnant. It does not mean anything close to what you say it does, never did, including when you were bei and professed to not care about the reasons women have abortions, equating them with the rationalization of criminals, thus you would never ask a woman wbout why she had one. Ignorance is not smart, bei.

Abortion is done to prevent the continuation of pregnancy, which significantly impacts a woman's health.

Just as a woman's primary reason to have and bear a child may not be for her health, it still affects her health.

But for this medical procedure, abortion, which maintains a woman's health equilibrium, and is done by health practitioners for what should be obvious reasons you insist that there must be a Stated health reason other than the obvious fact that she doesn't want to be pregnant. Pregnancy  alone is a health consideration which is implicit in the fact that she wants an abortion. No matter what her stated reason, the fact that her body will become grossly transformed is something she knows and isn't willing to go through is implicit in not wanting a child or another child.

You said

the overwhelming percentage of abortions are not done for any reason related to the health of the mother

 

I can tell you that when I had an abortion and someone asked me what my Primary reason was, it probably would have been that I'm not ready for a child. If I had said I don't want to go through a normal pregnancy would have been too obvious because I didn't physically want to go through with it unless I really wanted to have a kid.

0
Arekushieru It's fairly hard to pass the August 25, 2010 - 2:39pm

It's fairly hard to pass the treatment of continuing a pregnancy off as healthcare when the majority of pregnancies that are continued are not treated for any reason related to the health of the woman or even the unborn.   (Because, you see, what you determine to be not health is also applicable to the majority of those pregnancies that are continued.)  To even insinuate otherwise is to be just plain dishonest.

2
BornIn1984 It\'s fairly hard to pass the August 25, 2010 - 3:15pm

It\'s fairly hard to pass the treatment of continuing a pregnancy off as healthcare when the majority of pregnancies that are continued are not treated for any reason related to the health of the woman or even the unborn. (Because, you see, what you determine to be not health is also applicable to the majority of those pregnancies that are continued.) To even insinuate otherwise is to be just plain dishonest.



Now, see. The above typed out is, well, ridiculous, but no pro-choicer will come to point that out. As I have noticed, a pro-choicer here can claim that two plus two equals five and, because a pro-choicer said so, no one will bother him or her.

0
ahunt Not following, August 25, 2010 - 3:29pm

Not following, Bei...

 

Failure to obtain pre-natal care is actionable in some states...in the event of a bad outcome.

2
BornIn1984 And? August 25, 2010 - 3:46pm

And?

0
Arekushieru So saying that if one August 25, 2010 - 4:04pm

So saying that if one standard for health care practiced (during abortion) =  the same standard for health care MUST then be held (during pregnancy), = saying two plus two = five, while saying that if one standard for health care practiced (during abortion) =/=  saying that the same standard for health care must be held (during pregnancy), = saying  two plus two = 4? 

 

Basically you just said that 2 + 2 = 4 = 2 + 2 = 5 and 2 + 2 = 5 = 2 + 2 = 4, to put it simply for ya, Born.  ;)

 

Hmmm, I noticed no other ProLifer came to point out the ridiculousness of your claim.  Those false claims you make about ProChoicers actually apply to you and the other anti-choicers on this site, Born....  Just thought I should let you know.  

 

The maJORity of continued pregnancies are healthy (although I do think it is a small majority), Born.  Meaning there are NO health complications.  Thus, it isn't health care applying the SAME logic that Kevin applied.  WHOOOOPPPSS....?

 

 

0
Kevin Rahe You are correct August 25, 2010 - 7:58pm

The maJORity of continued pregnancies are healthy...  Meaning there are NO health complications.  Thus, it isn't health care applying the SAME logic that Kevin applied.

 

You are right.  A healthy pregnancy continued is not health care.  It is merely health.

0
crowepps Seems logical to me August 26, 2010 - 5:23pm

If your argument is that abortion can't be described as 'medical care' because pregnancy isn't 'an illness' but instead 'a natural condition' with few risks, then logically prenatal care isn't 'medical care' either, and neither are well baby exams or general checkups with no presenting problem.

5
rebellious grrl when the overwhelming August 25, 2010 - 4:19pm

when the overwhelming percentage of abortions are not done for any reason

There doesn't need to be any other reason than not wanting to be pregnant. Most abortions are done in the first trimester. Most women would prefer to have an abortion in the first trimester rather than trying to have a more difficult medical abortion in the second trimester.

Abortion is part of reproductive healthcare. I have a legal constitutional right to have an abortion, to have a right to privacy, a right to control my body. My rights trump those of a fetus.

As for your earlier comment, it was rude and abusive, I'm sure the moderators deleted it.

5
Amanda3788 How are the women who have to October 22, 2010 - 1:11pm

To BornIn 1984 : How are the women who have to make the choice of whether or not to get an abortion any of your concern?

0
SaltyC maintaining health August 25, 2010 - 2:42pm

Abortion maintains the health of the pregnant woman because in the vast majority of cases, pregnancy negatively and significantly impacts a woman's health, especially in the third trimester, long after abortion is an option. In a normal pregnancy this is the case. Maintaining normal health is healthcare.

A normal pregnancy will significantly and adversely impact the health of a healthy woman.

0
Kevin Rahe So... August 25, 2010 - 8:01pm

So, by that logic, a pregnant woman cannot remain healthy unless she gets an abortion.  Hmmm.  Can you find a reputable medical source that will back you up on that?

0
ahunt Get me from A) pregnancy August 25, 2010 - 9:03pm

Get me from A) pregnancy impacts negatively on a woman's health....to B) a pregnant woman cannot remain healthy unless she gets an abortion...logically.

 

Please?

0
Kevin Rahe I'm sure the logic is plain August 25, 2010 - 10:12pm

I'm sure the logic is plain to most readers, but for your benefit, if

 

A) pregnancy impacts negatively on a woman's health...

 

then how does a woman avoid that negative impact except by obtaining an abortion?

0
SaltyC Kevin, unlike you, I do not August 26, 2010 - 9:30am

Kevin, unlike you, I do not presume to have been put here to make decisions for pregnant women. If a woman is willing to undertake the enormous pressures of carrying out a pregnancy then I will support her and if help her in any way I can. That does not change the fact that it is a burden on her health to the point of, during the final stretch especially, it being a handicap. I don't know why pregnant women don't qualify for handicap parking during the third trimester.  During that time, it would be a far more dangerous procedure. But if a woman does not have any intention of having a child, she'll know that during the first trimester, before the major impacts happen, though negative health effects are present early on too, then she'll have an abortion when it is a simple procedure, unless the "pro-life" forces try and prevent her from obtaining one for as long as possible.

0
Julie Watkins And this is the point were "unfair"/"unjust" is raised August 26, 2010 - 10:40am

Because someone's attitude [the "mother"] about someone else [the ZBEF is a "person"] determines whether of not that "person" [the ZBEF] gets to live.

A Pro-Lifer says "It's just not fair! Injustice!! My existance shouldn't be dependant on someone else (their mother) deciding my life or death. Everyone deserves life!!!"

-- They don't really want to talk about forcing pregnancy on their mother. They resolve this inherant contradition by saying "Any real woman (any moral woman) wouldn't kill their child. It doesn't matter if they have unfair/sexist/classist expectations if the pregnant woman voluntarily goes along.

They totally ignore the ramifications of that attitude. [Attempting to] give birth [give life] needs to be a gift not an obligation, or women and poor people are being treating as if they are 2nd class. US laws have include a lot of sexism, classism, and raceism ... it's no wonder that the Human Rights record of the US disappoints.

0
crowepps Women accept the negative impact in order to have children August 26, 2010 - 4:46pm

A lot of women actually LIKE children and WANT to have them and are willing to tolerate the negative impact and take the risks in order to have children.

0
rebellious grrl Kevin, again, your point is? August 25, 2010 - 9:33pm

Kevin, again, your point is? If a woman is pregnant and does not want to be pregnant for whatever reason, it is her legal right, the right to her body to have an abortion. It is her choice. Abortion is a medical procedure.

0
NYCprochoiceMD Thank you for reminding us August 25, 2010 - 2:06am

Thank you for reminding us that, although the US claims to be a worldwide proponent of human rights, we ourselves are far below the benchmark in many respects, particularly pertaining to reproductive health.

Kevin, I know you're just here to cause a problem, but in case any readers feel a twinge of sympathy for your argument, I will point out that the fact that women of color are so much more likely than white women to have abortions is an indicator of our failings. Because we don't provide our teens high quality sex ed, and do not make access to contraception easy for everyone, we have much higher rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion than most other developed countries. The fact that we have higher rates of abortion speaks to the fact that we serve all our women poorly, and the fact that some Americans are so much more likely than others to face unintended pregnancy speaks to the many inequalities in our system.

Outside of reproductive health, people of color are much more likely to lack access to other preventive services. For instance, black men are much more likely than white men to require kidney dialysis. Dialysis is often preventable by controlling diabetes and high blood pressure. But that doesn't mean it isn't health care. The fact that people of color are more likely to require this kind of care does not indicate that they have better access to dialysis, it merely indicates they have WORSE access to preventive care.

Similarly, while abortion is often preventable, it is still health care when it is needed. Although Black and Latina women are more likely to use this care, the fact that they are more likely to require it means they have worse access to preventive care than White and Asian women.

0
carolyninthecity health care of the mind and body August 26, 2010 - 3:40pm

And let's not forget, health can mean mental health too. There is no question that a girl or a woman who is being forced to carry a pregnancy to term when she isn't ready or doesn't want to will more then likely become depressed or have severe anxiety. I think the state of your mind is just as important as the state of your body when bringing a child into the world.

 

How healthy can a woman who carried a pregnancy to term against her will, and now has no money, no resources, no support and is scared to death, possibly be?  I know the picture doesn't always look like this, but I'd say it's pretty common.