RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

presidential debates

Roundup: Debate Analysis, Catholics Votes, and CA Newspapers Say No on Prop 4

By Emily Douglas

October 16, 2008 - 12:47pm

Emily Douglas's picture
Debate analysis; how Catholics should vote; California newspaper editorialize in opposition to parental notification.

. . . . .

Fact or Fiction: The Debate and Reproductive Health

By Emily Douglas

October 16, 2008 - 12:09am

Emily Douglas's picture
Those of us waiting to hear the presidential candidates clarify their stances on abortion, women's health, equal pay and Supreme Court nominees had a lot to pay attention to tonight.

. . . . .

Candidates Debate Roe, Privacy, Equal Pay, and Feminist Bloggers Talk Back

By Emily Douglas

October 15, 2008 - 11:03pm

Emily Douglas's picture
As John McCain and Barack Obama debated abortion, privacy, women's medical decision-making and equal pay, feminist bloggers sounded off on the candidates' positions.

. . . . .

What Would a Women's Issues Debate Look Like?

By Sarah Seltzer, RH Reality Check

October 7, 2008 - 7:00am

Sarah Seltzer's picture
Grab your popcorn and get ready to bang your head against the wall -- debate season is in full swing. RH Reality Check envisions the questions we wish the candidates would face before an audience of millions.

. . . . .

The Palin-Biden Debate: Betting on Resurgent Social Issues

By Scott Swenson, RH Reality Check

September 30, 2008 - 7:00am

Scott Swenson's picture
With Sarah Palin's appeal to social conservatives and Joe Biden's pro-choice Catholicism, expect the McCain campaign to go all-in with the Culture War in Thursday's debate.

. . . . .

Candidates Must Address Global Reproductive Health in First Debate

By Serra Sippel, Center for Health and Gender Equity

September 24, 2008 - 7:00am

Serra Sippel's picture
In the upcoming presidential debate on foreign policy issues, will candidates be asked to address sexual and reproductive health and human rights of women as a critical component to our nation's foreign policy?

. . . . .