RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

insurance

Hmm, instead of 'One Less' I'll be one more?

Reader diary posted by Erica Sackin, Planned Parenthood of New York City

June 25, 2009 - 9:06am

Erica Sackin's picture

I'm too old to get the HPV vaccine. Is it worth shelling out $600 for? And is it really fair that I'm considered "too old" in the first place?


. . . . .

New York Times Article Misses the Point(s) On Stupak Amendment

By Jodi Jacobson, Senior Political Editor

November 16, 2009 - 11:13am

Jodi Jacobson's picture
An article by Kathleen Seelye in today's New York Times titled "In Congress, a Predicament for Abortion Supporters," can now be added to the growing list of media analyses that fail to accurately portray the implications of the Stupak amendment should it become law.

. . . . .

RNC To Eliminate Abortion Coverage in Health Plan, Undermining Rights of Female Employees

By Jodi Jacobson, Senior Political Editor

November 13, 2009 - 8:13am

Jodi Jacobson's picture
Washington Monthly reports this morning that the RNC, which has provided coverage for abortion care for its employees for over 18 years and was suddenly "caught out" this week, is now proceeding to remove that coverage from its policy. But even so the RNC will still indirectly subsidize abortions, every time it writes a check to Cigna, thereby rejecting the reasoning of the Stupak amendment at a fundamental level.

. . . . .

Weekly Pulse: The Stupak Setback

By Lindsay Beyerstein, RH Reality Check

November 11, 2009 - 1:59pm

Lindsay Beyerstein's picture
A clique of anti-choice Democrats in Congress joined forces with Republicans to pass an amendment forcing women to choose between affordable health insurance and abortion coverage, even if they pay for abortion coverage with their own money. Pro-choice Democrats and women’s health activists are up in arms over the eleventh hour deal

. . . . .

Kathleen Kennedy Townsend: The Health Reform Bill is Abortion-Neutral. Let's Pass It.

By Jodi Jacobson, Senior Political Editor

November 6, 2009 - 5:16pm

Jodi Jacobson's picture
In a remarkable piece at Newsweek.com, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend writes that it is in the national interest "to pass meaningful health-care reform and not litigate abortion in the process. Too much is at stake to let differences over abortion derail real health reform."

. . . . .

So There's This Conversation With My Pharmacist....

By s.e. smith

November 4, 2009 - 6:00am

s.e. smith's picture
Why is it that every time I try to refill my prescription for birth control I have to engage in the same 40 minutes of wrangling with my pharmacist?

. . . . .

Drugged, Raped and Denied Insurance

By Chris Turner

October 23, 2009 - 6:00am

Chris Turner's picture
After being drugged and raped on a business trip, I received counseling and anti-HIV medications to help me survive. But to insurance companies my rape and treatment were "pre-existing conditions."

. . . . .

(Video) Clueless In Congress: Senator Sessions Badgers Mom Bankrupted by Son's Illness

By Jodi Jacobson, Senior Political Editor

October 22, 2009 - 1:24pm

Jodi Jacobson's picture
This past Tuesday, Senator Sessions (R-AL) literally badgers a mother forced into bankruptcy by her son's illness and death from cystic fibrosis because she didn't fill out a computer form correctly.

. . . . .

A Midwife Speaks: When Birth Costs Are Too High, Health Can Be Compromised

By Amie Newman, Managing Editor

October 14, 2009 - 4:02pm

Amie Newman's picture
When some women are literally begging their midwife not to transfer them to a hospital because they can't afford to pay the costs associated with a hospital birth, or women must spend part of their pregnancy searching for ways to pay for prenatal care instead of actually getting the care they need, we're talking about a crisis of coverage in this country.

. . . . .

Daily Pulse: Obama's Health Care Speech

By Lindsay Beyerstein, RH Reality Check

September 10, 2009 - 2:13pm

Lindsay Beyerstein's picture
The President's speech was impressive, but as John Nichols of the Nation observed, hardly a rousing "to-the-barricades" oration. The proposed "limited public exchange" is not what supporters had in mind but won't "threaten" insurance companies.

. . . . .