George Bush
Scott Swenson on August 13, 2008 - 4:48pm
MoveOn.org mobilizes its 3.5 million members to stop the Bush Administration's attempt to define contraception as abortion. RH Reality Check is cited as source.
. . . . .
Scott Swenson on August 12, 2008 - 10:30am
HHS Secretary Michael Leavitt blogs again about the proposed HHS regulations that redefine contraception as abortion, without mentioning the word contraception. But he demonstrates he knows how to play the game of far-right ideological abortion politics.
. . . . .
Scott Swenson on August 9, 2008 - 3:37pm
The Bush Administration efforts to redefine contraception as abortion continue to make major news, and give anti-choice publications one more chance to stir up emotion and misinformation.
. . . . .
Scott Swenson on August 7, 2008 - 7:59pm
HHS Sec. Michael Leavitt blogs about the proposed HHS regulations redefining contraception as abortion.
. . . . .
Brady Swenson on July 28, 2008 - 11:42am
Independent council in UK recommends compulsory comprehensive sex education, GOP attempts to lure conservatives to polls with ballot initiatives, 49% of IVF treatments result in multiple births, Ashley Judd discovers importance of family planning in Africa.
. . . . .
Scott Swenson on July 24, 2008 - 12:43pm
Planned Parenthood chides Bush HHS on their attempted end run on abstinence-only funding, a story seen first on RH Reality Check that the mainstream media has yet to pick up.
. . . . .
Marcela Howell on July 16, 2008 - 8:00am
Home to Netroots Nation this week, the progressive convention for political activists and bloggers, Texas is also home to the highest teen birth rate in the nation while spending more on abstinence-only programs than any state. The mix is the perfect recipe for political change.
. . . . .
Kate Michelman and Frances Kissling on July 8, 2008 - 8:00am
It's an official quadrennial tradition: Every four years, self-described moderates advise the Democratic Party that its long-standing and electorally successful pro-choice position is the reason that "values voters" are deserting the party. We are told these voters could be brought into the fold if Democrats would temper their defense of women's freedom with tacit condemnation of the choices many women make.
. . . . .
|
