anti-choice Democrats
By Amie Newman, Managing Editor November 19, 2009 - 1:24pm
Rep. Diana DeGette releases a statement on the Senate bill's exclusion of the anti-choice Stupak Amendment language and her vision for moving forward with health care reform.
. . . . .
By Amie Newman, Managing Editor November 19, 2009 - 1:02pm
The Senate health care reform bill was released last night and maintains the status quo on abortion access, throwing out any abortion coverage bans a la the Stupak Amendment; Catholics argue against the idea that banning private insurance coverage for abortion in the House bill was some kind of common ground effort; and DC disses birth control coverage.
. . . . .
By Amie Newman, Managing Editor November 9, 2009 - 3:38pm
Pro-choice Democrats in the House of Representatives are fighting against the anti-choice Stupak Amendment that rolls back women's rights in order to pass health care reform legislation.
. . . . .
By Jodi Jacobson, Senior Political Editor November 7, 2009 - 11:53pm
Wanna know which Dems voted to give away your rights by passing the Stupak amendment in the health reform bill? Here's a list of the 64 who voted yes.
. . . . .
By Amie Newman, Managing Editor October 30, 2009 - 1:30pm
Are anti-choice Democrats fighting health reform in the House over federal funds for abortion coverage or are they crying wolf - again?
. . . . .
Pro-choice initiatives from Prevention First to zeroing out abstinence-only funding will need support from socially conservative Democrats. That's why we need to understand the aims of anti-choice Dems.
. . . . .
The New York Times today reported that a record number of anti-choice Democrats are running for Congressional seats, often with generous backing of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
. . . . .
Reassuring Southern voters about core social issues like abortion was likely the only way Democrats could have won recent special elections in Mississippi and Louisiana. So how can reproductive health advocates get newly-elected anti-choice Dems to work with us?
. . . . .
|
