<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Marcela Howell's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/marcela"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/954/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/954/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-08-09T16:35:45+00:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Progressive Bloggers Do Texas - And Confront Bad Sex Education Policies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/07/16/progressive-bloggers-do-texas-and-confront-bad-sex-education-policies" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/07/16/progressive-bloggers-do-texas-and-confront-bad-sex-education-policies</id>
    <published>2008-07-16T12:00:00+00:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-16T03:03:09+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marcela Howell</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Leading Voices" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Election 2008" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="abstinence-only" />
    <category term="bloggers" />
    <category term="congress" />
    <category term="George Bush" />
    <category term="Nancy Pelosi" />
    <category term="Netroots Nation 2008" />
    <category term="President Bush" />
    <category term="Texas" />
    <category term="Title V" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Home to Netroots Nation this week, the progressive convention for political activists and bloggers, Texas is also home to the highest teen birth rate in the nation while spending more on abstinence-only programs than any state. The mix is the perfect recipe for political change.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
What state has the worst teen birth rate, the 10th highest AIDS rate and the 7th worst  syphilis rate in the country? 
</p>
<p>
Hint - it's the same state that brought us George Bush and spends more on abstinence-only-until-marriage programs than any other state.
</p>
<p>
That's right - Texas.
</p>
<p>
In June 2008, federal statistics showed that the majority, 52.9 percent, of Texas students in ninth through 12th grades had sexual intercourse. That's compared to 47.8 percent nationally. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also reported that young people in Texas are less likely to use condoms.
</p>
<p>
Yet, Texas actually spent $17 million last year on abstinence-only programs to promote virginity until marriage. Talk about denying reality!
</p>
<p>
This week, Texas has the distinction of hosting Netroots Nation - the national gathering of progressive bloggers from all across the country.  These are the people who can make or break issues and campaigns.
</p>
<p>
Bloggers have taken President Bush and the Democratic leadership in Congress to task for continuing to support failed abstinence-only programs that research shows have no impact on teen sexual behavior. 
</p>
<p>
It's no wonder bloggers have even raised &quot;abstinence-only&quot; questions to #5 on the Netroots Nation &quot;Ask the Speaker&quot; (as in Nancy Pelosi) site.
</p>
<p>
Yes - the democratic-controlled Congress is part of the problem. Just last week, Democrats voted to <em>extend</em> funding for these ineffective Title V abstinence-only programs for 12 months.  And last year, the House of Representatives, in total disregard for a congressionally mandated report that showed the programs don't work, tried to <em>increase</em> funding for abstinence-only programs by $28 million. That's right - increase! 
</p>
<p>
So it is significant that Netroots Nation is meeting in Texas this week - home of some of the worst adolescent sexual health outcomes in the country.  
</p>
<p>
Public schools in Texas are not required to offer sex education, but those that do must make the lessons abstinence-focused. So after spending more than $117 million over two decades on abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, the state of Texas has the following adolescent health outcomes (courtesy of the National Vital Statistics Reports):<br />
</p>
<ul>
	<li>In Texas, 220 teen women aged 15 to 19 become pregnant every single day.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>Texas's teen pregnancy rate is 101 per 1,000. The national rate is 84.  Only MS, NM, AZ, and NV have higher rates.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>Texas has the worst teen birth rate among 15 to 19 year olds at 64 per 1,000. The national rate is 41 per 1,000. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>The teen birth rate in Texas for 15-19-year olds only dropped by 18% between 1992-2000 while the national rate dropped by 24 percent. Texas ranks 4th worst in decline, after WY, NE, and ND.  </li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>Texas has 7th worst syphilis rate and 17th worst gonorrhea rate in the country. </li>
</ul>
<ul>
	<li>Among states with available data, Texas has the lowest percentage of teens that report using condoms at last sex (56 percent; HI and NM were lower). </li>
</ul>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<p>
It's time that Texas legislators and Congress to stand up for what works and end funding for these failed abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. Progressive bloggers and young people are paving the way toward holding Congress on both sides of the aisle accountable.<br />
<br />
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Will Democrats Stand Up for Sex Education?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/01/07/will-democrats-finally-stand-up-for-sex-education" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/01/07/will-democrats-finally-stand-up-for-sex-education</id>
    <published>2008-01-07T15:30:00+00:00</published>
    <updated>2008-01-07T17:32:49+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marcela Howell</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Leading Voices" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="abstinence-only" />
    <category term="comprehensive sexuality education" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Like most progressive activists, I viewed the results of the November 7, 2006 election with joy. Finally the issue of <a class="glossary-term" href="/glossary/term/137">comprehensive sex education</a> would be under the control of elected officials whom I trusted. Well, guess what? Nothing changed.</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Like most progressive activists, I viewed the results of the November 7, 2006 election with joy. Finally, I thought, the issue I had worked on for over eight years - - <a class="glossary-term" href="/glossary/term/137"><acronym title="Comprehensive Sex Education: Auto generated by glossary_taxonomy_nodetitle, for Comprehensive Sex Education">comprehensive sex education</acronym></a> - - would be under the control of elected officials whom I trusted.</p>
<p>Finally, I thought, the REAL Act, the bill to provide federal funding to states to implement comprehensive sex education programs, might actually see the light of day instead of languishing in committees as it had since December of 2001.</p>
<p>Finally, I thought, there would be formal hearings in the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on the numerous studies and reports showing that abstinence-only-until-marriage programs don&#39;t work and highlighting the fact that a conservative Congress had wasted over $1.5 billion to support their right-wing cronies.</p>
<p>Finally, I thought, the pseudo-scientists pushed as &quot;experts&quot; by the Bush Administration would be exposed for the quacks and charlatans they really were.</p>
<p>And finally, I thought, all the funding for these ineffective and harmful abstinence-only-until-marriage programs would be eliminated. Ended! Stopped!</p>
<p>Finally! Finally! Finally!</p>
<p>Well, guess what? None of this happened.</p>
<p>Instead, the House of Representatives voted to increase the community-based abstinence education (CBAE) programs by $28 million. People pointed the finger at the tyrannical chair of the House Appropriations Committee, David Obey (WI). The old &quot;Obey will be Obey&quot; excuse was repeated ad nauseam. But there were 36 other Democrats on the Appropriations Committee who had a hand in this outrage.</p>
<p>To be fair, not all Dems fell down on the job. </p>
<p>Led by Senator Harkin (IA) and Lautenberg (NJ), the Senate voted to cut the same CBAE programs by $28 million. A short-lived victory, as the Senate caved to the House during conference committee. </p>
<p>It was only after President Bush vetoed the Labor-Health and Human Services Appropriations bill that the Democrats withdrew the $28 million increase. But did they go with the Senate version that cut the funding? Not a chance, they funded these ineffective programs at the same level as the conservative GOP majority had when it was in control.</p>
<p>In the aftermath of congressional deal making, some supporters of comprehensive sex education viewed level funding as a victory - - &quot;At least it wasn&#39;t an increase.&quot;</p>
<p>But it&#39;s not a victory - - it&#39;s an insult.</p>
<p>It&#39;s an insult to sound public health policy, to scientific accuracy, and to the vast majority of American parents who believe that their teens should receive complete and accurate sexual health information.</p>
<p>So, here we are - - exactly 425 days since the Democrats won control of Congress and what do we have to show for this leadership when it comes to honest sex education . . .</p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> The REAL Act still languishes in the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pension and the House Energy and Commerce Committees.</li>
</ul>
<p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> There have been zero hearings on the gender biases presented by some abstinence-only programs, or the discriminatory language inherent in the A-H definition of abstinence education, or the scientifically flawed information these programs give teens about condom effectiveness in preventing HIV or unwanted pregnancy. </li>
</ul>
<p>
<ul class="unIndentedList">
<li> And worst - - the Democrats continue the federal funding for these failed abstinence-only programs. Besides level-funding for the CBAE program, both the House and the Senate also extended funding for Title V instead of simply letting the reauthorization of this core ab-only program lapse in July, 2007 as scheduled. </li>
</ul>
<p>If you talk to some Hill staffers, they will tell you that there was no &quot;community&quot; (i.e., advocacy groups) will to push these issues. If you talk with the advocacy organizations, they&#39;ll tell you that there was no real &quot;political&quot; (i.e., elected officials) will to take on difficult issues.</p>
<p>Either way you slice it, over 25 million American teens are the losers.</p>
<p>2008 is a presidential election year and many of us are counting the days until a Bush Administration is just a few paragraphs in our history books. But a Democratic White House and a Democratic-controlled Congress means little if the &quot;community&quot; will and the &quot;political&quot; will don&#39;t add up to real change. And real change means Honest Sex Education in America&#39;s schools. Finally!</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Waiting On A Dream</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2007/08/09/waiting-on-a-dream" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2007/08/09/waiting-on-a-dream</id>
    <published>2007-08-09T12:18:00+00:00</published>
    <updated>2007-08-09T16:35:45+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marcela Howell</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Leading Voices" />
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="Media Watch" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>In <em>Walk in My Shoes: A Black Activist&#39;s Guide to Surviving the Women&#39;s Movement</em>, Marcela Howell helps young women of color navigate the turbulent waters of the white women&#39;s movement.</p>
     ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>In 2005, I took a break from my position at Advocates for Youth to work on a series of essays about my experiences in the women&#39;s, or reproductive<img src="http://static.flickr.com/1064/1040611528_1fa8194a1e_s.jpg#right_240_1000" border="0" /> rights, movement. I knew that what I had experienced over some 30-plus years was still being experienced by young African American activists today. The collection of essays, <em><a href="http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/publications/walkinmyshoes.htm">Walk in My Shoes: A Black Activist&#39;s Guide to Surviving the Women&#39;s Movement</a></em>, which resulted from my 15-month sabbatical, uses my experiences as anecdotes to help young women of color navigate the turbulent -- and, at times --  treacherous waters of the white women&#39;s movement. Even as I wrote, I hoped that my experiences would no longer be relevant to a younger generation. But, unfortunately, I knew they would be. </p>
<p>During my involvement with various women&#39;s/<a class="glossary-term" href="/glossary/term/133"><acronym title="Reproductive Rights: Auto generated by glossary_taxonomy_nodetitle, for Reproductive Rights">reproductive rights</acronym></a> organizations, I&#39;ve watched young Black women come and go. Most arrive at these women&#39;s/ reproductive rights organizations with idealistic hopes of what they can achieve. By the time they leave, usually within a few years, they are disillusioned with these organizations in particular and with the women&#39;s movement in general. In many cases, these young women find themselves in inhospitable and often hostile environments. They are seen as interlopers or &quot;window dressing&quot; to appease the Black board members or foundations that think the organization is not diverse enough. White women activists tend to see this movement as theirs, rarely acknowledging or even knowing the roles that Black women have played since its inception. Because they are unfamiliar with the history of the women&#39;s movement, many young Black women have little ammunition to push back against this misconception.</p>
<p>No one can argue that overt racism was at the core of the early suffrage and population control chapters of the women&#39;s and reproductive rights movement. From insisting that African American women march in the back of women&#39;s voting rights demonstrations to refusing to give them speaking roles at women&#39;s conventions to targeting young black girls for sterilization, the leadership of the early suffrage and birth control efforts made it clear that the concerns and needs of African American women were secondary to the concerns and needs of white women. And that imbalance still exists. Racism is not something you can shove off to the side and ignore; unless deliberately slain, it will rear its ugly head again. Because white women leaders have not conquered racism within their own organizations, the women&#39;s and reproductive rights movement made up of those organizations has become a breeding ground for subtle racism that fosters distrust and hostility among women of color and their white counterparts.</p>
<p>Overt racism has given way to subtle racism. Exclusionary policies have been masked as isolated &quot;diversity&quot; projects that end up reinforcing the exclusivity of the movement rather than its inclusiveness. Racism or white privilege exists within our society because those who benefit from that privilege allow it to continue. </p>
<p>As they read drafts of <em>Walk In My Shoes</em>, friends and colleagues have asked me why I stayed involved.  I&#39;ve asked myself that same question. And my answer is &quot;faith.&quot; I became involved in the women&#39;s movement because I heard something different and believed it. I still do. I believe that because women are still primarily responsible for the early development of children, they can change society simply by raising their children differently. Women can change society by choosing to not be involved with men who hate. Women can impact racism by consciously rejecting subtle racism and examining white privilege both in their professional and personal lives.</p>
<p>When I first became involved in women&#39;s rights, it was a budding movement born of the anti-war and black power movements. Women of all colors -- black, white and brown women -- worked side by side for something better. Women&#39;s liberation held a certain resonance that signified a massive new beginning. Here was a cause that was my cause.  </p>
<p>Here was a movement that said to the Catholic Church that had denied me the right to be an altar boy -- up yours! Or to the brothers who preached Black liberation, but only meant it for men -- up yours! Or to the anti-war leaders who only wanted women to cook the food, make the signs and clean up after the meetings -- UP YOURS!</p>
<p>Women talked about social justice. We were going to confront all the aspects of <em>diss</em>-respect and condescension that permeated every other movement. We were going to change how politics were done. We were going to demand that women be treated with respect. By changing the plight of women, we would change the world. I believed it then and I believe it now -- in spite of what I know and what I&#39;ve experienced. This is why I stayed.  I stayed for the dream of a truly equal, socially transforming movement. I&#39;m still waiting.</p>
     ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
