<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Lynda Waddington's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/lynda-waddington"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/919/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/919/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-11-24T21:43:17-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Harkin: Stupak Amendment A Slippery Slope</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/11/10/harkin-stupak-amendment-a-slippery-slope" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/11/10/harkin-stupak-amendment-a-slippery-slope</id>
    <published>2009-11-10T14:33:04-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-11-10T15:05:48-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="abortion" />
    <category term="anti-choice" />
    <category term="health reform" />
    <category term="Hyde" />
    <category term="insurance exchange" />
    <category term="Pitts" />
    <category term="pro-choice" />
    <category term="Stupak" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><!--paging_filter-->Stupak-Pitts is a slippery slope: For example, every health insurance company in America could now lose some of its tax benefits.  And you could just say that anybody that got a federal loan for housing could not get an abortion.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div class="post-content">
<blockquote>
	<p>
	This article is republished from <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/22154/harkin-warns-that-stupaks-abortion-amendment-is-slippery-slope"><em>Iowa Independent</em></a> under a partnership between <em>Iowa Independent</em>, the Center for Independent Media and RH Reality Check. 
	</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
A last-minute amendment to the health care
reform bill that passed the U.S. House on Saturday is disruptive to the
current ban on federal funding for abortion services and could lead
down a slippery slope that prevents women from accessing services with
their own money as well, U.S. Sen. <a href="http://harkin.senate.gov/">Tom Harkin</a> said Tuesday.
</p>
<div style="float:right;margin:10px;" width="250px">
<img src="http://iowaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/harkin-dawes-081-300x241.jpg" border="0" alt="U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin (Lauren Victoria Burke/WDCPIX.COM)" title="Tom Harkin" width="250" />
<p style="width:250px;font-size:10px;">
U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin (Lauren Victoria Burke/WDCPIX.COM)
</p>
</div>
<p>
“You have to be a little bit careful here because the way the …
amendment is written, it can now be taken to other steps. For example,
every health insurance company in America could now lose some of its
tax benefits that it gets for providing health insurance if it provides
abortion services. You can take this on down. You could just say that
anybody that got a federal loan for housing could not get an abortion.
You can take this and just keep going on and on and on with no end in
sight,” Harkin said.
</p>
<p>
The language inserted in the House came by way of the <a href="/blog/2009/11/07/whose-leaning-stupak-is-it-your-rep">Stupak-Pitts Amendment</a>,
which prohibits abortion coverage for any health insurance product
subsidized in any way by the federal government.  As it is written, the
bill dictates that any person seeking insurance is barred from
purchasing abortion coverage, even if the premium for such insurance is
paid out-of-pocket, if the person receives any government assistance.
</p>
<p>
“I just fear that the House-passed language goes far beyond
[previous restrictions] and will effectively prevent women from
receiving abortion coverage under the new health exchanges even if they
are using their own money to buy insurance,” Harkin said. “I think that
is unfortunate and goes too far. So, we will be addressing this issue
before [the Senate bill] goes to the floor. My hope is that we can
strike the appropriate balance.”
</p>
<p>
Harkin said his personal preference, and the one he believed all
lawmakers had agreed upon prior to the introduction of this amendment,
was maintenance of a nearly three-decade agreement that barred use of
federal funds for abortion except in cases of incest, rape and life of
the mother.
</p>
<p>
“I think keeping the status quo is the best thing we can do,” he
said. “I think it has worked well over the past 20-some years, and I
see no reason to change it at this point.”
</p>
<p>
The Democratic senator from Cumming, who serves as chairman for the <a href="http://help.senate.gov/">Senate Health, Education, Pensions and Labor Committee</a>,
did stop short of saying he would vote against a reform bill in the
Senate that included language similar to what was in the House version.
</p>
<p>
“I’m willing to work with my fellow senators, and my refrain is
going to be, ‘Don’t upset the apple cart.’ Right now, I believe
everyone in our country — except, let’s face it, some fringe groups —
like what we have right now. It works well. We have conscience clauses.
We provide no federal funding for abortions anywhere except for incest,
rape and life of the mother. I think time has shown that these
provisions work well. I see no reason to go beyond that now and to let
maybe one fringe group or the other upset our whole health care bill
because they want to change what has been an accepted law and practice
for the past almost 30 years,” he said.
</p>
<p>
Although every Republican member of the U.S. House voted in favor of
the amendment to further restrict abortion access, only one Republican
ended up crossing the aisle to vote for the whole reform bill.
</p>
<p>
“I think that there are a lot of people, and I think you’ll see this
in the Senate debate, who want to vote for amendments and will never
vote for the bill,” Harkin said, and noted that within the HELP
Committee more than 200 Republican amendments were considered, and 161
adopted, yet no Republican member could find a way to vote for the
committee’s final bill.
</p>
<p>
“I think it will become clear that those who are doing these things
aren’t just amending the bill to make it better or to try to make it
work better. They want to kill the bill. Period. Republicans have said
that repeatedly. They want to kill this bill. They want to stop Obama.
They want to stop these changes.”
</p>
</div>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Health Insurance for All: Necessary But Not Sufficient For Rural America</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/10/20/health-insurance-all-necessary-but-not-sufficient-for-rural-america" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/10/20/health-insurance-all-necessary-but-not-sufficient-for-rural-america</id>
    <published>2009-10-22T07:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-10-22T08:51:22-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="access to care" />
    <category term="equitable care" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="health insurance" />
    <category term="Iowa Department of Public Health" />
    <category term="public option" />
    <category term="rural areas" />
    <category term="Rural Wisconsin Health Cooperative" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Expanding insurance coverage is important, experts say, but only half the battle. For many Americans, particularly in rural areas, access to high quality health care could remain elusive.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<blockquote>
	<p>
	This article is published in partnership with the Center for Independent Media, the <em>Iowa Independent</em>, and <em>RH Reality Check</em>. 
	</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
The national health care reform debate has been dominated by issues
like the public option, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates and,
unfortunately, too many distractions and misconceptions. Of all the
open questions about moves to improve American health care, perhaps the
only fact known for sure is that changes are afoot that would likely
result in millions of uninsured Americans getting health insurance. 
</p>
<p>
Expanding insurance coverage is important, experts say, but that is
only half the battle. For many Americans, particularly in rural parts
of the country, access to high quality health care services could
remain elusive.
</p>
<p>
“We have some serious challenges in Iowa as it relates to the number
of providers that we have,” said Tom Newton, executive director of the <a href="http://www.idph.state.ia.us/" target="_blank">Iowa Department of Public Health</a>.
“We do have a high percentage of our population in Iowa that is insured
at this time, and I would tell you that even some of them struggle
right now to get access to health care. You can’t just assume that by
providing people with a source of payment that you’ve provided them
with access to health care.”
</p>
<p>
As The Iowa Independent has previously reported, the Hawkeye State,
like many other rural states, is coping with a plummeting number of
health care professionals, including specialists, primary care <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/12606/doctor-drain-threatens-rural-health-care" target="_blank">physicians</a>, <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/14568/more-educators-could-stem-iowas-nursing-crisis" target="_blank">nurses</a> and <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/19648/states-struggle-to-meet-rural-behavioral-health-needs-without-federal-funds" target="_blank">behavioral health</a> professionals.
</p>
<p>
While several factors such as perceived career <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/15480/social-stigma-threatens-rural-iowas-reproductive-health-access" target="_blank">stress</a> and <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/17746/iowa-delegation-deal-brokered-for-medicare-payment-reform" target="_blank">compensation issues</a> are at the root of the decline, the problem is also being amplified by a rapidly aging health care workforce.
</p>
<p>
As a part of H1N1 flu response and vaccination plan development for
health care providers, Newton said he spoke with a public health
administrator in Van Buren County about the department’s plan to
utilize flu mist, a live-virus vaccination that is delivered through
the nose like a nasal spray. Because that vaccination contains a live
virus, its use has been restricted to certain age groups.
</p>
<p>
“Health care providers were going to be our targeted audience for
using flu mist, at least in some cases. But, in Van Buren County they
do not have any health care providers that are under the age 49,”
Newton said, noting that regulations prohibit anyone 49 and up from
using the live virus. “That presents problems for us from a vaccination
standpoint, but what does that say about health care providers in those
communities? There are probably going to be some of those folks who are
eligible to retire within five years.”
</p>
<p>
The alarming demographics and shrinking number of health care
workers in rural areas are not just limited to primary care doctors.
Other components of health care are also in short supply in much of
Iowa.
</p>
<p>
“We aren’t just talking about those people that are traditionally thought of as health care providers – it’s <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/14743/report-dental-costs-one-of-largest-health-care-burdens-for-farm-families" target="_blank">dentists</a>, it’s <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/16472/farmer-suicides-spotlight-lack-of-mental-health-care-in-rural-america" target="_blank">mental health</a> and it’s even <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/20217/iowa-other-states-scramble-to-meet-hivaids-prescription-needs" target="_blank">pharmacy</a>,” said Cheryll Jones, a southeastern Iowa pediatric nurse practitioner who serves on the board of the <a href="http://www.iaruralhealth.org/" target="_blank">Iowa Rural Health Association</a>.
“There aren’t necessarily huge numbers of pharmacies in rural areas.
So, even if you have a provider, you may have to travel a fair distance
to get your prescription filled.
</p>
<p>
“[Workforce] is a concern that we have, and not just for rural, but
especially for rural. Certainly, the need for folks to have health
insurance is important, and that is where a lot of the focus has been,
but access to insurance does not equate to access to care.”
</p>
<p>
A declining and aging workforce is probably the most publicly
visible of the challenges facing a health care system, but it is far
from the only challenge for rural areas. According to Tim Size,
executive director of the <a href="http://www.rwhc.com/" target="_blank">Rural Wisconsin Health Cooperative</a>, his state, like Iowa, has maintained a relatively low uninsured rate.
</p>
<p>
“We are very used to dealing with rural health in an environment
where most people have insurance cards,” Size said. “People having
insurance cards is much better than people not having insurance cards,
but it doesn’t deal with the long, long list of issues that we have to
struggle with.”
</p>
<p>
As health care companies react to the current global economic
recession, there will be efforts to make health care services more
centralized, which isn’t always in the best interest of rural consumers
or providers.
</p>
<p>
“We need collaborative ways for rural to work with rural and for
rural to work with urban that maintains services available in the rural
areas,” Size said. “From that respect, we have to be very concerned
about the economic incentives that will come with reform. … There are a
lot of models floating around out there that have tended to be
developed in urban communities and we need to be very cautious about
those being mandated into rural communities without any demonstrating
or testing of the idea.”
</p>
<p>
When it comes to the debate over improving health care, Newton said,
“It all comes down to how you define access.” For many rural residents,
the definition is likely to remain too narrow to make much of a
difference.
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Religious Groups Say &quot;Abortion Mandate&quot; Ads Mislead</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/08/04/religious-groups-say-abortion-mandate-ads-mislead" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/08/04/religious-groups-say-abortion-mandate-ads-mislead</id>
    <published>2009-08-06T08:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-08-06T01:51:27-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="abortion and health care reform" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="public funding for abortion" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Two religious organizations have called on the Family Research Council to shut down a television ad and Web site that contain “massive misinformation” related to the national discussion on health care reform.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="entry-body">
<div>
<div class="item-body">
<div>
<p>
Two
religious organizations have called on the Family Research Council and
other anti-abortion groups to shut down a television ad and Web site
that contain “massive misinformation” related to the national
discussion on health care reform.
</p>
<p>
The site in question, “Stop the Abortion Mandate,” kicked off with a
July 23 webcast that included spokespeople for more than 15
anti-abortion organizations and two Republican members of Congress. As
The Iowa Independent <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/17804/health-care-reform-once-again-becomes-a-battle-of-values" target="_blank">previously reported</a>,
speakers who took part in the webcast painted a grim picture for those
who oppose abortion: Passage of health care reform not containing a
specific exclusion for reproductive health services will result in the
closure of Catholic hospitals, the refusal of “pro-life” individuals to
enter the medical field and the collapse of Crisis Pregnancy Centers
due to the lack of medical personnel who oppose abortion.
</p>
<p>
“This is quite literally a defining moment for us,” said Charmaine
Yoest, president and chief executive of Americans United for Life. “If
the abortion lobby succeeds in defining abortion as health care, it
will have shifted the entire debate.”
</p>
<p>
The television <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxFC9Af3W1U" target="_blank">ad</a>,
which has been playing in Iowa, portrays the conversation of a husband
and wife, claiming that current health care proposals would deny
funding for essential treatments while providing public funding for
abortions. It is entitled “After a Government Takeover.”
</p>
<p>
Rev. Dr. Carlton W. Veasey, president and chief executive of the <a href="http://www.rcrc.org/" target="_blank">Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice</a>,
said the politicians and activists who have put their names and
reputations behind this campaign are misleading their constituents.
</p>
<p>
“The Family Research Council and its allies in this campaign have
consistently and repeatedly twisted the truth to promote their agenda
and bring down health care reform,” Veasey said. “Because abortion is a
critical component of women’s reproductive health care, it should be
included in a health care package. But the fact is that there is no
‘mandate.’”
</p>
<p>
Chris Korzen, executive director of <a href="http://www.catholics-united.org/?q=node/18" target="_blank">Catholics United</a>,
said his organization is mobilizing membership to e-mail the Family
Research Council’s offices and urge the organization to suspend its
misinformation campaign. In addition, Catholics United have planned a
series of actions throughout the August Congressional recess to set the
record straight about the current health care reform proposal and the
truth behind the <a href="http://www.frc.org/" target="_blank">Family Research Council</a>’s activities.
</p>
<p>
“Either the Family Research Council is seriously misinformed, or it
is intentionally distorting the truth in order to derail health care
reform,” Korzen said. “If the Family Research Council was truly
committed to human life it would focus its efforts on ensuring that the
tens of millions of Americans who currently lack health insurance can
get the care they need. This attack … is unhelpful, untruthful and not
at all pro-life.”
</p>
<p>
Veasey admits that “honest people” can and do have “profound disagreements” about when and if abortion should be permissable.
</p>
<p>
“But this issue should not be used to manipulate public opinion on
health care reform,” he said. “Leaders of public opinion have a
responsibility to engage in honest discourse and to respect diverse
views. In this case, that can best be achieved by shutting down this
Web site and pulling the Family Research Council television ads set to
run in five states and any other media that distorts the facts.”
</p>
<p>
The Senate Finance Committee, led by chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and
ranking Republican Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and , has yet to publicly
present a health care reform bill. The bill that was approved Friday by
the U.S. House Committee on Energy and Finance, however, <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/17978/house-committee-gives-public-first-clues-on-abortion-health-care-reform" target="_blank">includes specific language</a>
that would require abortion services to continue with the existing
status quo. That is, the only abortion services that could be paid for
with government funds would be those in which the mother’s life was
endangered or in cases of rape or incest.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reform of Iowa&#039;s HIV Transmission Law Meets Resistance</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/07/08/resistance-reforming-iowas-hiv-transmission-law-persists" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/07/08/resistance-reforming-iowas-hiv-transmission-law-persists</id>
    <published>2009-07-29T08:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-07-28T23:37:35-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="criminalization of HIV transmission" />
    <category term="criminalization of sex" />
    <category term="HIV exposure" />
    <category term="HIV transmission" />
    <category term="HIV/AIDS" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The case of an Iowa man sentenced to the maximum allowed by state law for failing to disclose to a one-time intimate partner that he was HIV-positive has been cited as evidence of the need to reevaluate state criminal transmission laws.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
An Iowa man, whose only previous encounter with the law was a 2006
operating-while-intoxicated conviction, was sentenced to the maximum
allowed by state law for failing to disclose to a one-time intimate
partner that he was HIV-positive. The case, which has not resulted in
the one-time partner actually contracting HIV, has been used as
evidence by some who say it’s time that state criminal transmission
laws should be re-evaluated.
</p>
<p>
Iowa, however, isn’t a state with a high percentage of people living
with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS. Prosecutions related to this
particular law are often highly publicized as much for their uniqueness
as for a public’s need to know. In addition, of the statute’s 24
convictions since its inception, three have been appealed and
subsequently affirmed by the Iowa Supreme Court.
</p>
<p>
Ed Fallon, a member of the Iowa legislature during the 1998 session when <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/16621/iowa-courts-stand-firm-on-hiv-transmission-law" target="_blank">the HIV transmission</a>
law was nearly unanimously passed, said he voted in favor despite
having some reservations at the time. Because more than a decade has
passed, he can’t remember specific items of contention that may have
been brought up during legislative debate, but he has a general sense
of the federal government requiring such a law if the state wanted to
access monies for HIV- and AIDS-related care and education.
</p>
<p>
Fallon also isn’t sure if often spirited debate surrounding the ban
on same-sex marriage, passed earlier that same session, influenced
debate of the criminal transmission law.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Opening a door to unintended consequences</strong>
</p>
<p>
Bob Rigg, an academic member of a <a href="http://www.legis.state.ia.us/aspx/Committees/Committee.aspx?id=211" target="_blank">legislative study committee</a>
charged with reorganizing the criminal code, believes members of the
group are likely be willing to address issues surrounding this statute
and others during the course of their research. That being said, he
also wants advocates to understand that “once the flood gate is opened,
it can’t be closed.”
</p>
<p>
“There is often this notion of ‘Boy, we are going to change it and
we are going to make it all better,’ but sometimes when you open that
door [you don't get the results you intended],” said Rigg, who worked
as a public defender in Polk County until 1995 when he became director
of a criminal defense program he developed at Drake University.
</p>
<p>
“Keep in mind that when you are talking about a legislature, a lot
of them are from rural areas. They are conservative. They have notions
about how things work and how they don’t work. Their understanding may
be absolutely perfect, but their clarity on some other things might not
be. And, you are asking these members to weigh in on a criminal act
that you’re going to turn into a crime and punish someone for doing. To
me, that is a very dangerous thing to do unless you know exactly where
you are going with it and exactly what’s going to happen with it. …
There’s no way to stop it, and there is no way to stop the amendments
that would come from either one political party or the other.”
</p>
<p>
Rigg’s personal preference, because the political process can be so
unpredictable, is to be extremely thoughtful when considering criminal
code changes.
</p>
<p>
“When people start playing around with the criminal code or they
start saying that we should amend our Constitution, I’m like, ‘No, we
shouldn’t.’ I err on the side of caution,” he said. “If you think what
you’ve got is bad, be careful. You just might end up with something
even worse.”
</p>
<p>
Although he is familiar with and has written about Iowa’s criminal
transmission of HIV law, he says he still doesn’t know enough about it
to determine if it is effective policy.
</p>
<p>
“The worst policy in the world is made on an anecdotal basis,” he
said. “That is, when you don’t like the result of one case out of
1,000, and you attempt to change policy to fix that one result. What
happens is that you end up making the other 999 worse. That’s the worst
way to make policy, and the worst way to get legislation through.”
</p>
<p>
A thorough evaluation of the transmission law, according to Rigg, would be an analysis of each case that has been prosecuted.
</p>
<p>
“You have to look at the Department of Corrections because although
people have been sentence, you want to know exactly how much time
they’ve served,” he said. “Just because a defendant is sentenced to 25
[years], doesn’t mean he or she is going to serve 25. Some of these
individuals could be paroled in as little as two.”
</p>
<p>
While state intervention to reduce prison sentences may not be an
intended consequence of the initial legislation, Rigg argues that it
can have “a moderating effect” on an otherwise extreme sentence.
</p>
<p>
“It is the judge’s job to sentence them. It is the DOC’s job to evaluate them for release,” he said.
</p>
<p>
Because he hasn’t done an extensive study on the practical impacts
of this particular statute, which is not currently on the committee’s
radar, Rigg indicated he didn’t feel comfortable voicing an opinion as
to its effectiveness.
</p>
<p>
“Is this statute something that should be discussed? Yes,” he said.
“I think all laws should be evaluated periodically to see if they are
accomplishing the intended goals of the legislature. Matter-of-fact,
now that you called me I might bring this statute up within the
subcommittee and ask what is going on with it.”
</p>
<p>
Yet even if Rigg and the rest of the committee decide to research
this or other criminal statutes, such review is not likely to be quick.
The last major revision of the criminal code took place in 1978, a
process that began, according to Rigg, during the 1960s.
</p>
<p>
EARLIER: <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/16351/hiv-positive-mans-prison-sentence-shines-light-on-iowa-law" target="_blank">HIV-positive man’s prison sentence shines light on Iowa law</a>; <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/16621/iowa-courts-stand-firm-on-hiv-transmission-law" target="_blank">Iowa courts stand firm on HIV transmission law</a> 
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Harkin: &quot;We Aren&#039;t Dancing Around the Edges&quot; of Health Care Reform</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/09/harkin-we-arent-dancing-around-edges-health-care-reform" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/09/harkin-we-arent-dancing-around-edges-health-care-reform</id>
    <published>2009-06-11T08:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-10T20:02:31-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="access to health care" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="women&#039;s health" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The current state of health care delivery in America is so grim that U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin no longer uses the word "care" in reference to reform.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
NORTH LIBERTY - The current state of health care delivery in America
is so grim that U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin no longer uses the word &quot;care&quot; in
reference to reform.
</p>
<p>
&quot;We need health reform,&quot; the Democrat told the roughly 200 individuals who gathered at an <a href="http://www.aarp.org/issues/dividedwefail/" target="_blank">AARP forum</a>
in North Liberty on Saturday. &quot;I don't say that we need health care
reform because you can't reform something you don't already have. We
don't have a health care system in America. We have a sick care system.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Harkin said the World Health Organization <a href="http://www.who.int/whr/2000/media_centre/press_release/en/index.html" target="_blank">ranks</a>
the U.S. health care system 37th in the world, on par with Serbia.
Despite the fact that the U.S. spends twice as much per capita on
health care as European countries, he explained, Americans face twice
the number of chronic diseases.
</p>
<p>
&quot;We spend 95 cents of every dollar on treating illnesses and
conditions after they occur,&quot; he said. &quot;In other words, we've been
neglecting wellness and disease prevention. That's the bad news. The
good news is that right now I think that we have a chance to make a
dramatic change.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Although Congress is not always known for its ability to act
swiftly, Harkin said President Obama &quot;is adamant&quot; that health reform be
complete by October of this year. In addition, Harkin is optimistic, if
not fully confident, that the deadline will be met.
</p>
<p>
&quot;What we are doing is marking up our bill ... during the last two
weeks of June,&quot; Harkin said. &quot;We plan to be done with it before the
July Fourth recess. We will come back after July 4 and will be on the
floor of the U.S. Senate in July with both the finance bill, which
basically covers Medicare and Medicaid and the taxing part of it, and
our bill, the health bill. We plan to have it done before the August
recess. It will go to conference during August and September so that it
can be done in October.
</p>
<p>
&quot;And I'm telling you, we cannot fail in this. We have got to get it done.&quot;
</p>
<p>
President Barack Obama invoked the same sense of urgency on health
reform during his weekly radio address, released Saturday.  That drew
criticism from Iowa's other senator, Republican Chuck Grassley, via the
social messaging site Twitter.  Grassley complained that Obama had
&quot;nerve&quot; to tell Congress to deliver on health care while he was off
&quot;sight seeing&quot; in Paris.  Obama is on an oversees trip that took him to
Egypt, where he delivered a major address intended for muslim nations;
Germany, where he visited the site of a Nazi concentration camp; and
France, where he observed the anniversary of D-Day with other world
leaders.
</p>
<p>
Harkin said that because the country has come together in what
describes as &quot;a critical mass,&quot; comprehensive reform is much more of a
certainty now than it was during discussions during the 1990s.
</p>
<p>
&quot;I want to impress upon you: We aren't dancing around the edges,&quot; he
said. &quot;What we are planning on doing will change the very fabric - the
very fabric - of how we do health in America. It's not just changing
medicine, but it is changing the kind of medicine we do.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Despite a recently published <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/15851/grassley-specifies-objections-to-public-health-care-option" target="_blank">column by Grassley</a>
listing reasons for his opposition to a public plan option, Harkin
confidently proclaimed that the reform will contain such an option, and
that it will be national. Harkin also lamented the fact that single
payer was not on the table despite his personal support and the growing
support of the majority of Americans for that option.
</p>
<p>
Noting that there is not enough support in Washington to pass a
single-payer system, Harkin said that &quot;there are a lot of things the
majority of Americans support that Congress won't do.&quot; Harkin also
praised members of the audience who carried signs calling for a
single-payer system, saying that one of the major reasons that a public
plan is now a real possibility is due in large part to their advocacy.
</p>
<p>
Although members of the audience grumbled during the
question-and-answer portion of the forum when Harkin indicated full
implementation of such sweeping change could take several years, panel
member Cathy Glasson, state president of the <a href="http://www.seiu199.org/" target="_blank">Service Employees International Union</a>, pointed to the nation's <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/14658/nursing-crisis-looms-over-iowa" target="_blank">looming</a> nursing <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/14568/more-educators-could-stem-iowas-nursing-crisis" target="_blank">crisis</a> as evidence of why reform will take time.
</p>
<p>
&quot;I don't think people are considering [the shortage of nurses and
other health care professionals] in relation to reform of our nation's
health care system,&quot; said Glasson, who has worked for more than two
decades as a registered nurse. &quot;We are going to be adding between 47 to
52 million currently uninsured individuals into the system. If we don't
have the qualified professionals to care for the influx of those folks,
we are going to have a major disaster on our hands.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Harkin also wanted to assure those in attendance that existing low federal reimbursement rates that have been <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/12606/doctor-drain-threatens-rural-health-care" target="_blank">negatively impacting Iowa hospitals and health care professionals</a> will be revamped during the course of reform.
</p>
<p>
&quot;Our Iowa doctors, nurses and professionals have a lot to be proud
of,&quot; Harkin said. &quot;I don't know how many more studies we need from the
Commonwealth Fund and Dartmouth and others ranking Iowa in the top
places nationally for providing quality health care delivery. But our
current reimbursement system is based on volume, not quality. Well, if
you reimburse on volume, you get volume. But if you start reimbursing
on quality, you'll get quality.&quot;
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Study Highlights Grim Realities of Rural Obstetric Access</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/08/study-highlights-grim-realities-rural-obstetric-access" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/08/study-highlights-grim-realities-rural-obstetric-access</id>
    <published>2009-06-09T09:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-08T23:38:32-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="access to health care" />
    <category term="obstetric care" />
    <category term="rural areas" />
    <category term="women&#039;s health" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[In 1985, over 87 percent of hospitals in remote areas provided obstetric services. Seventeen years later, less than half of existing hospitals offered obstetric services to their communities.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="entry-body">
<div>
<div class="item-body">
<div>
<p>
In 1985,
over 87 percent of hospitals in remote areas provided obstetric
services. Seventeen years later, less than half of existing hospitals
offered obstetric services to their communities.
</p>
<p>
Although the overall number of hospitals across the nation have
declined since 1985, a study by the Walsh Center for Rural Health
Analysis indicates the overall percentage drop is dwarfed by the number
of rural hospitals that no longer offer obstetrical (labor and
delivery) services.
</p>
<p>
<span><a href="http://www.norc.org/NR/rdonlyres/E3FB78C4-A487-4667-80B5-AD9006C31DDE/0/DecliningAccesstoHospitalbasedObstetricServicesinRuralCounties.pdf" target="_blank">The research</a>
made public this week was conducted for the U.S. Office of Rural Health
Policy, and examined the declining availability of hospital-based
obstetric services in rural areas from roughly 1985 to 2000. 
Researcher and author Dr. Lan Zhao fleshed out potential causes for the
trend and attempted to explore the effects of medical malpractice
reforms.</span>
</p>
<p>
<a href="/blog/2009/03/16/doctor-drain-threatens-rural-health-care-iowa">A special news report</a>
from RH Reality Check in March detailed the same occurrence of
declining rural obstetrical services on the state level, highlighting
the most recent decision by an eastern Iowa hospital to stop providing
this care and Iowa’s ongoing battle with doctor drain.
</p>
<p>
“This is an issue of concern for policymakers and public health
researchers, as it may reduce access to obstetric services in some
rural communities and, as a result, adversely impact maternal and
infant health,” Zhao wrote.
</p>
<p>
While specifically targeting the years 1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000,
Zhao concluded that “the decline in the number of hospitals and the
number of beds per hospital nationwide has been accompanied by even
more pronounced declines in certain types of health services provided
by hospitals.” According to figures assembled from national databases,
the number of hospitals that provided obstetric services dropped by 23
percent from 1985 to 2000. As a result, more than one-third of U.S.
counties lacked hospital-based obstetrical services.
</p>
<p>
Physicians interviewed as a part of the study most often spoke of
increasing malpractice insurance premiums as their reasons for
discontinuing to offer obstetrical services in certain geographic
regions or for closing their practices. During the time period of the
study, there were three significant spikes in malpractice insurance
rates, and each one was answered legislatively by way of tort reform.
Unfortunately, due to non-precise data, Zhao could not with certainty
say that such reforms had or would be successful.
</p>
<p>
“Even though there was limited evidence from our … analysis that the
mandatory offset of collateral source rule and caps on total or
non-economic damages increased the likelihood that a county had
hospital-based obstetric service, we cannot draw firm conclusions about
the effectiveness of tort reforms due to lack of sufficient precision
in our estimates. Further research is needed on the effectiveness of
alternative measures that are designed to improve the availability of
malpractice insurance and curb premium spikes.”
</p>
<p>
Discussions with hospital administrators were also conducted to
capture local perceptions of the impact of the loss of hospital-based
obstetric services.  The most frequently cited reasons for closing
obstetric units were low volumes of deliveries in rural communities,
financial vulnerabilities due to high proportions of patients on
Medicaid, and difficulties in staffing obstetric units.  Reasons for
difficulties in staffing obstetric units include malpractice burdens
for physicians, changes in physicians’ attitudes toward work and
quality of life, and the costs involved in recruiting supporting
specialists such as anesthesiologists and surgeons.
</p>
<p>
Zhao found that more than 60 percent of hospitals that closed their
obstetric units were within a 30-minute drive to another hospital that
provided at least basic obstetric services, suggesting that, in most
cases, closures of hospital obstetric units may not have caused serious
access-to-care problem. However, the researcher also noted that women
at high risk for complications during labor and delivery may have had
to travel longer distances to obtain specialized care.
</p>
<p>
The Maryland-based <a href="http://www.norc.org/Aboutus/divisions/Public+Health+Research/Walsh+Center+for+Rural+Health+Analysis" target="_blank">Walsh Center for Rural Health Analysis</a>
was previously one of eight research centers funded by federal Office
of Rural Health Policy. It is part of the Health Policy and Evaluation
division of NORC – a national organization for research at the
University of Chicago.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Stigma Threatens Reproductive Health Care Access in Rural Iowa</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/05/28/stigma-threatens-reproductive-health-care-access-rural-iowa" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/05/28/stigma-threatens-reproductive-health-care-access-rural-iowa</id>
    <published>2009-06-01T09:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-01T08:31:27-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="access to birth control" />
    <category term="access to care" />
    <category term="rural area" />
    <category term="stigma" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Women living in rural Iowa who need reproductive health care — from contraception to diagnostic tests to abortion — are too often left without access to the services they need.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
In rural Iowa, most health care services, including reproductive health
care, are provided by general family practitioners, not by specialists
within specific fields. Because many rural areas have a limited number
of family practices to begin with, both providers and patients have
specific privacy worries and concerns about the public perception of
services offered. Women who need reproductive health care — from
contraception to diagnostic tests to abortion — are too often left
without access to the services they need.
</p>
<p>
According to the <a href="http://www.abortionaccess.org/" target="_blank">Abortion Access Project</a>,
which tracks access to reproductive health care across the country,
many doctors who could perform certain procedures choose not to because
of potential backlash from local residents who disapprove of abortion
and related health services.
</p>
<p>
“One of the things we found through our survey project is that many
general practice physicians who otherwise have the skill set to perform
certain procedures such as first trimester aspiration abortion don’t do
so because there is a feeling or a belief that doing so would create
some sort of community backlash,” said Kathleen Lane, who works for the
Abortion Access Project.
</p>
<p>
While abortion is perhaps the most controversial procedure within
the field of reproductive health care, it is not the only one that is
affected by small-town stigmas. For instance, young people in rural
areas who wish to access birth control may be understandably
uncomfortable talking about it with a doctor who could easily or
inadvertently disclose what was said to parents or other relatives.
There is perhaps even more stigma attached to young people who need
treatments for sexually transmitted infections, which, if left
untreated, can lead to serious health consequences including
infertility.
</p>
<p>
<span class="inline inline-right"><a href="http://www.iowainitiative.org/clinic_locations/clinic_locations.php"><img class="image image-preview" src="/files/images/Iowa%20map.jpg" border="0" alt="Iowa women can currently access completely free long-term birth control at several clinics throughout Iowa. Across the state there are several free or low-cost clinics that provide family planning services." title="Iowa women can currently access completely free long-term birth control at several clinics throughout Iowa. Across the state there are several free or low-cost clinics that provide family planning services." width="350" height="232" /></a><span class="caption">Iowa women can currently access completely free long-term birth control at several clinics throughout Iowa. Across the state there are several free or low-cost clinics that provide family planning services.</span></span>
</p>
<p>
“We know that all access is not created equal,” said Christie
Vilsack, the former first lady of Iowa who is now executive director of
the <a href="http://www.iowainitiative.org/" target="_blank">Iowa Initiative</a>, a research organization that aims to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies across the state.
</p>
<p>
“One of the reasons the Iowa Initiative exists is that Iowa is 48th
in access to reproductive health care services among the states. We are
a research project that is spending the next 3 to 4 years finishing a
five-year research program, and nearly everything we are doing is about
access — especially access in rural Iowa. One of the reasons we are
48th is because we are a very rural state, and many of our smallest
communities don’t have reproductive health care services available.”
</p>
<p>
Over the past year, the Iowa Initiative has administered a pilot
program involving satellite clinics, which provide reproductive health
care services to communities that would not otherwise have access to
them. (When feasible, these clinics have been placed within existing
medical facilities, such as hospitals and wellness centers.) The
organization is also starting a test program that provides free
long-term birth control to women. At the end of these test programs,
the Iowa Initiative hopes to provide useful data to organizations
across the country about how to successfully reduce unintended
pregnancies, which cost taxpayers millions of dollars annually and are
the largest factor contributing to elective abortions.
</p>
<p>
“It’s really important for people to understand that reproductive
health for women is mainstream and no different than any other type of
health care,” Vilsack said. “In many cases — and I think this is
especially true in small towns — there is a perception that these
services are taboo or something controversial when they aren’t at all.
People have babies every day. Most everyone who has been sexually
active has used birth control at one time or another. There’s nothing
taboo about it, it is just a part of health care.”
</p>
<p>
The Iowa Initiative’s new rural satellite clinics are staffed with
individuals who can provide information on the latest technological
advances in family planning and who can tailor birth control options to
individual needs and circumstances. The Abortion Access Project is
tackling the problem in a slightly different way, working to help
physicians who already practice in rural communities to be better
prepared to meet the needs of women seeking reproductive health
services.
</p>
<p>
“It’s true that there is a <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/12606/doctor-drain-threatens-rural-health-care" target="_blank">doctor drain</a>
happening in specialized services such as obstetrical care. But when we
think about comprehensive reproductive health care services that
include abortion and STI testing, these are not services that need to
be provided only by specific doctors,” Lane said. “All of this
perfectly fits into the scope of practice of family medicine. Years
ago, before abortion and so much of these became hot-button political
issues, women could go to their regular doctor for these services.
</p>
<p>
“There’s this whole aspect of continuity of care — of women being
able to go the physician who knows their entire health history,” Lane
said. “That’s the piece that is really missing for both rural and urban
women.” 
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Nursing Crisis Looms over Iowa</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/05/05/nursing-crisis-looms-over-iowa" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/05/05/nursing-crisis-looms-over-iowa</id>
    <published>2009-05-19T09:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-05-19T00:00:21-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="health care services" />
    <category term="nursing" />
    <category term="women&#039;s health" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Shortages of nurses continue to cause concern among elected officials and health care analysts in Iowa, increasing pressure for solutions.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
A shortage of nurses has caused concern among elected officials and
health care analysts for decades. At least two Iowa governors have
convened task forces to investigate the problem and offer
recommendations.
</p>
<p>
With all the added scrutiny and few practical solutions to show for
it, most signs point to a nursing crisis that continues to get worse,
and Iowa is likely to bear the brunt of it.
</p>
<p>
The American Health Care Association estimated in July that 116,000
nursing positions in hospitals and more than 19,000 positions in
long-term care facilities were vacant. The problem is projected to
skyrocket by 2010 to an estimated shortage of 275,000 nurses. By 2020,
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services anticipates a shortage
of 1 million nurses.
</p>
<p>
A significant cause of the problem is a lack of qualified educators
to train new nurses. Nearly 2,000 otherwise qualified applicants to
Iowa nursing programs were not able to attend in 2008 due to educator
shortages.
</p>
<p>
“It is the single largest contributor to the shortage,” explained Dr. Rita A. Frantz, professor and dean of the <a href="http://www.nursing.uiowa.edu/" target="_blank">University of Iowa College of Nursing</a>.
“We have a national shortage of nurse faculty as well as a shortage of
practicing nurses. The two are intricately intertwined. That is,
without the appropriate number of nurse faculty, we can’t admit all the
qualified applicants to our nursing programs.”
</p>
<p>
And new nurses are not only needed to fill existing vacancies but to replace a rapidly aging nursing workforce.
</p>
<p>
In December 2007, the Iowa Board of Nursing stated that 41 percent
of the state’s active licensed practical nurses (LPNs) were age 47 and
up. In addition, 51 percent of the active registered nurses (RNs) in
the state were age 47 and above.
</p>
<p>
“Here at the University of Iowa, the average age of a faculty member
is 56,” Frantz said. “If you look at them by rank, with the most senior
rank being a full professor, the average age is 59. Those are your more
senior, experienced researchers and teachers. We’re going to have large
numbers of them leaving the academic environment to retire in a fairly
short period of time.”
</p>
<p>
<strong>Demographic shifts, worsening economy exacerbate Iowa’s nursing crisis</strong>
</p>
<p>
The Iowa Nursing Task Force, which presented <a href="http://www.governor.iowa.gov/news/2008/03/attachments/080303-Nursing-Task-Force-Report.pdf" target="_blank">a written report</a>
in March 2008, predicted that by 2020, the state would experience a
shortfall of about 9,000 RNs, or one-fourth of the current workforce.
</p>
<p>
This is dire news for the Hawkeye State, whose aging population
places increasing demands on health care services, especially on
long-term facilities. An older population, combined with trends of
younger families vacating rural counties, could result in a magnified
problem in Iowa’s rural areas and smaller hospitals.
</p>
<p>
“Because rural hospitals have a primary population of older
patients, their primary revenue stream is from Medicare,” Frantz said.
“Those reimbursement rates for acute care hospitalization are in many
cases not sufficient to cover the costs of delivering care to that
patient population. … Hospitals in larger areas draw from a larger
cross-section of the general population and have more sources for their
revenue stream.”
</p>
<p>
As more of the population is impacted by the economic downturn, more
people will likely turn to public health care coverage like
Medicare/Medicaid as their primary coverage. This forces even
mid-sized, urban hospitals in Iowa to tighten their belts, implementing
hiring freezes to control costs. That can have the effect of masking
the underlying nursing shortage.
</p>
<p>
“Hiring freezes are the case in some pockets of the country,” said
Frantz. “I worry that might be misinterpreted by the public to mean
that the nursing shortage is over. That is not the case. It is a blip
on the economic radar screen.”
</p>
<p>
Frantz believes that once the economy improves and unemployed or
underemployed people return to work, many will once again begin full
use of health care benefits.
</p>
<p>
“There is a projection that once the economy turns around again, we
will have a huge upswing in the demand for health care services,” she
said. “Along with that will come a major upswing for nursing services.
At that same time, we have these factors that we know are contributing
to the shortage. Those will be more evident and place further stress on
health care facilities at the same time.&quot;
</p>
<a href="/blog/2009/05/08/for-culture-wars-a-hail-mary"></a>
<p>
<strong>More Educators Could Stem Crisis</strong>
</p>
<p>
Though reforming the U.S. health care system will likely produce
controversial answers to a long list of complicated questions, one
proposed solution to the nation’s worsening nurse shortage is
alluringly simple.
</p>
<p>
Each year, nursing schools turn away thousands of qualified
applicants for lack of the instructors and resources to accommodate
them. If only schools could admit more students, <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/14658/nursing-crisis-looms-over-iowa" target="_blank">the looming nursing crisis</a> might be reversed.
</p>
<p>
“If I can put it in anatomical terms, there’s not enough red blood
cells flowing through the blood stream. We need to make more red blood
cells,” said Dr. Rita A. Frantz, professor and dean at the University
of Iowa’s College of Nursing. “It’s not that we don’t have the
students. We definitely have the applicant pool — way more than we can
accommodate. And this isn’t a problem unique to our school. It’s
happening throughout the country.”
</p>
<p>
U.S. Rep. Tom Latham (R-Ames), who has been an active participant in
policy discussions related to nursing for years, thinks the federal
government can help give schools like Frantz’s the resources they need
to attract more nurse educators. Together with <a href="http://tammybaldwin.house.gov/" target="_blank">U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin</a>, a Wisconsin Democrat, Latham introduced <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-1460" target="_blank">a bill</a>
that would establish a federal student loan repayment program for
nurses who agree to teach full-time at an accredited school of nursing.
</p>
<p>
Programs already exist to help nursing school graduates pay student
loans, but none specifically target prospective instructors. In 2004,
Iowa began a new <a href="http://www.studentloan.org/Manage-Your-Loan/Forgivable-Loans/Nursing-Education-Loan-Forgiveness.aspx" target="_blank">Nursing Education Loan Repayment Program</a>
that took aim at alleviating the shortage of nurse educators and
registered nurses (RNs), especially those who work in long-term care
facilities or in rural communities. The program, administered by the <a href="http://www.iowacollegeaid.gov/commissioncentral/loanforgiveness/nursing.html" target="_blank">Iowa College Student Aid Commission</a>,
does not eliminate required payments to student loans, but supplements
the payments. Depending on the nurse’s chosen place of employment, the
supplements can range from $5,000 to $20,000, spread over a four-year
commitment.
</p>
<p>
The bill proposed by Baldwin and Latham would specifically target
individuals who are interested in pursuing advanced degrees to become
nurse educators.
</p>
<p>
Frantz is all for it. “It gives individuals an option of working off
their loan by being a faculty member,” she explained. “If the
legislation passes as it is currently written, these educators could
work off as much as 80 percent of their total loan debt — which is just
amazing.”
</p>
<p>
Among other benefits, the bill might do a better job keeping nursing
school graduates in Iowa than efforts targeted at other types of
nurses. Students who hope to become nursing instructors “have family
and other ties to the state that will keep them here, which is not
necessarily the case with our undergraduate students,” Frantz said.
</p>
<p>
A few interest groups have already come out in support of the
Latham-Baldwin bill. Dr. Polly Bednash, executive director of the
American Association of Colleges of Nursing, <a href="http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Media/NewsReleases/2008/HigherEdAct.html" target="_blank">applauded</a> it.
</p>
<p>
“A significant barrier to addressing the nurse faculty shortage is
enticing nurses with advanced degrees to pursue careers in academia
when salaries in the practice setting are much higher,” Bednash said.
“One way to compensate for these lower salaries and attract younger
nurses into teaching roles is to relieve their educational debt.”
</p>
<p>
The Service Employees International Union, which counts 80,000 nurses among its 2 million members nationwide, has also <a href="http://www.seiu.org/2009/03/seiu-supports-new-bill-to-ease-debt-for-nursing-students.php" target="_blank">endorsed</a> the measure.
</p>
<p>
<strong>When free market incentives go wrong, government help may be needed</strong>
</p>
<p>
Recognizing that its own nursing instructors were growing older and
that few replacements were coming in to fill the void, the University
of Iowa launched a multi-faceted program in 2007 that shifted more
emphasis toward the preparation of new nursing instructors.
</p>
<p>
The program has achieved some success. Forty-five students are
expected to graduate at the end of this summer with an advanced degree
that will have prepared them to teach in Iowa’s community college
system. An additional 70 students were admitted to that program this
spring and are scheduled to graduate next summer.
</p>
<p>
Despite the university’s efforts to train more nurse educators, once
students graduate with advanced degrees, it is often in their financial
interests to work in clinical practice instead. The average annual
salary for nurse educators is about 20 percent less than nurses with
higher degrees can earn in clinical practice. (This despite the fact
that nurse salaries are low industry-wide.)
</p>
<p>
Latham and Baldwin hope their bill will correct the disparity, making it less of a sacrifice to teach.
</p>
<p>
“I believe this would go a long way toward addressing the nursing
shortage,” Latham said. “There are plenty of qualified applicants who
want to become nurses that are shut out each year.”
</p>
<p>
Latham says he is not opposed to the bill being grouped into a
larger health care reform package. He understands that either way it
would require a new appropriation, but he says the cost is necessary to
avert a health care disaster.
</p>
<p>
“Nurses really are the face of health care,” he said. “If left
unaddressed, this shortage is going to undermine access and quality of
care in Iowa and throughout the nation.”
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Can Chemical Abortions Be Linked to Midwestern Agriculture?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/04/06/can-chemical-abortions-be-linked-midwestern-agriculture" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/04/06/can-chemical-abortions-be-linked-midwestern-agriculture</id>
    <published>2009-04-08T08:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-04-07T21:16:48-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="environmental health and reproductive justice" />
    <category term="reproductive health" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Driving across a rural Iowa highway, anti-abortion signs are almost as common a sight as farmers spraying crops. Now there is a growing body of evidence linking the substances sprayed on fields to human reproductive health issues, including unintended abortions.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
Driving across a rural Iowa highway, anti-abortion signs are almost
as common a sight as farmers spraying crops. Now there is a growing
body of evidence linking the substances sprayed on fields to human
reproductive health issues, including unintended abortions.
</p>
<p>
“Abortion means more than just a woman entering a clinic and
willfully terminating a pregnancy,” said Sandra Steingraber, an
ecologist and author invited to speak at the University of Northern
Iowa tonight. “It also refers to chemicals we are using in farming. If
farming communities — where we know that pro-life sentiments run strong
— are contributing to fetal death, then that is a disconnect that we
need to examine closely.”
</p>
<p>
Steingraber, an internationally recognized expert on the links
between environment and human health, believes society has a moral
obligation to move toward chemical-free, organic farming. She plans to
outline the reasons for that in detail during <a href="http://www.umpr.uni.edu/NewsReleases.asp?NewsID=4228" target="_blank">her visit at UNI</a>, but agreed to speak with me in advance of her appearance.
</p>
<p>
“It’s definitely the chemicalization of farming,” Steingraber said,
noting that the topic is somewhat related to flood frequency. “When you
have these huge runoffs, you get these big burdens of farm chemicals
carried downstream. There is definitely a connection between the farm
chemicals used in Iowa and the dead zones in the Gulf of Mexico.”
</p>
<p>
Her book “<a href="http://www.steingraber.com/01books/living_downstream/01ldbody1.html" target="_blank">Living Downstream</a>”
was the first text that linked environmental and chemical data to the
information available from the U.S. cancer registry. For the first
time, and through the telling of her own battle with cancer,
Steingraber was able to present cancer as a human rights issue.
</p>
<p>
“Ecologically, we are linked together,” she said. “That’s why I
called my book ‘Living Downstream’ — to point to how the things we do
in one place affects people in ecological communities and farming
downstream.”
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://archive.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/" target="_blank">A study released in 2005</a>
by the Environmental Working Group of the blood taken from 10 umbilical
cords revealed an average of 200 industrial chemicals and pollutants in
each sample. The umbilical cord blood of the 10 children, collected by
the Red Cross after the cord was cut, harbored pesticides, consumer
product ingredients and wastes from burning coal, gasoline and garbage.
Of the total 287 chemicals identified, 180 are carcinogens and 217 are
toxic to the nervous system. In addition, 208 cause birth defects or
abnormal development in animal tests.
</p>
<p>
“There is a growing body of evidence linking exposure to different
sources of farm chemicals to problems with reproductive health for both
men and women,” Steingraber said.
</p>
<p>
According to Steingraber, the commonly used pesticide methoxyclor
has the ability to prevent implantation of an embryo in the uterus.
</p>
<p>
“When a farm chemical like methoxyclor gets into the body of a woman
— and it gets into the body because it is present in the environment in
which she lives — then she can abort a pregnancy,” she said. “I think
there is room in this debate for a big conversation about these
chemicals. We need to talk about farm chemicals as chemical
abortionists, or chemicals that have the ability to extinguish human
pregnancies.”
</p>
<p>
Steingraber said this type of discussion is one that can “bridge the gap of the divide in our culture” for abortion.
</p>
<p>
“Sometimes you can drive in rural areas and see a big pro-life sign
and right behind it will be a farmer spraying chemicals that might very
well be linked to reproductive problems,” she said.
</p>
<p>
“Having given many presentations and speeches and having lots of
conversations in farm country, I’ve come to believe that there is just
a lot of unknowing. When the evidence is placed before people, they
tend to be very moved by it.”
</p>
<p>
In addition to the impact on reproductive health, Steingraber
believes food security is another key reason people are now more
willing to have a discussion about local and organic agriculture.
</p>
<p>
“The idea that we are food insecure in the middle of the most
fertile soil in the world — that all of our food comes to us floating
on barrels of diesel fuel from California and beyond is nuts,” she
said. “It makes us prone to problems like pathogens in food. MRSA, an
antibiotic-resistant staph infection, which is a huge problem in Iowa,
may be linked to hog farming operations. But there are a lot of public
health problems related to chemical farming. So, rebuilding local and
regional food systems and transforming Iowa from a food desert and into
a bread basket again is a message that I’ll bring.”
</p>
<p>
Health issues that have possible links to farm chemicals include
early pubescence in girls, asthma and male genital malformation. And,
with at least some of the chemicals, density in the body may only
increase from generation to generation. In the EWG study of cord blood
samples, for example, researchers found DDT and other pesticides that
were banned more than three decades ago.
</p>
<p>
“Peoples’ motivations for seeing these connections and being willing
to look at the evidence — because it is all based on evidence, and
there is a lot of data under my feet when I talk about these things —
people have various reasons for looking at this,” Steingraber said.
“For my mother, who is quite conservative, it was the idea that the
Middle East is, in her words, ‘holding us hostage’ due to our need for
foreign oil. So, that’s her entree into thinking about the chemicals
being used and their links to human health.”
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Iowa GOP Blames Dems for Same-Sex Marriage Ruling</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/04/06/iowa-gop-blames-dems-samesex-marriage-ruling" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/04/06/iowa-gop-blames-dems-samesex-marriage-ruling</id>
    <published>2009-04-07T08:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-04-06T20:44:12-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="LGBT issues" />
    <category term="LGBT rights" />
    <category term="marriage equality" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Despite the fact that Iowa’s defense of marriage act was passed with the help of Democrats, Republicans throughout the state are connecting the dots between the recent court opinion legalizing same-sex marriage and elections in 2010.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[Despite the
fact that Iowa’s defense of marriage act was passed with the help of
Democrats in the state legislature and signed by Democratic Gov. Tom
Vilsack, Republicans throughout the state are already connecting the
dots between the recent court opinion legalizing same-sex marriage and the
next round of elections in 2010.<span></span>
</p>
<p>
“The sad and simple fact is this decision could have been avoided,”
Matt Strawn, chairman of the Republican Party of Iowa, said in a
prepared statement this morning. “Once clear that Iowa’s marriage law
was under attack by the courts and outside interest groups, majority
Democrats had every opportunity to advance legislation removing the
politics from protecting marriage and placing the decision directly in
the hands of Iowa voters.”
</p>
<p>
Strawn added that the Democrats wait-and-see attitude toward the
court ruling  is “yet another example of majority Democrats dodging the
tough decisions that responsible legislation requires.”
</p>
<p>
Bob Vander Plaats, a Republican who has already tossed his hat into
the next gubernatorial contest, pledged on WHO radio this morning that
if he is elected governor he will do “everything in my power to affirm
marriage in Iowa as between one man and one woman.”
</p>
<p>
Iowa Senate Minority Leader Paul McKinley (R-Chariton) said the the decision is “disappointing on many levels.”
</p>
<p>
“Though the court has made their decision, I believe every Iowan
should have a voice on this matter and that is why the Iowa Legislature
should immediately act to pass a Constitutional Amendment that protects
traditional marriage, keeps it as a sacred bond only between one man
and one woman and gives every Iowan a chance to have their say through
a vote of the people,” he wrote in a prepared statement.
</p>
<p>
Jason Hamann, co-founder of conservative action group Everyday
America, who petitioned the legislature to act against the original
district court ruling, claimed the Iowa high court “doesn’t understand
the Constitution or its role in interpreting law.” He accused the court
of “creating legislation form the bench.”
</p>
<p>
And Hamann didn’t limit his criticism to court justices.
</p>
<p>
“Any executive branch official who in any way participates with
issuing same-sex marriage licenses should be censured and voted out of
office or fired if appropriate,” he said in a statement today.
</p>
<p>
House Minority Leader Kraig Paulsen (R-Hiawatha) said that the
perceived standoff beween the legislative and judicial branches of
government should be decided by a Constitutional amendment before the
voters.
</p>
<p>
“In 2007, the Legislature responded immediately when our flag
desecretion law was ruled unconstitutional, we should act swiftly now
and protet the institution of marriage,” Paulsen said. “There is
currently a bi-partisan proposal protecting marriage before the
legislature (HJR 6) and it should be debated immediately.”
</p>
<p>
While Paulsen stopped short of offering a proposed remedy if the
legislature refuses to debate the proposed House bill, the implied
political threat was already in the Republican echo chamber.
</p>
<p>
“We are preparing for a battle,” Republican Rep. Kent Sorenson wrote via <a href="http://twitter.com/KentSorenson" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, “and will fighting give the people the opportunity to vote.”
</p>
<p>
Sorenson’s follow-up said, “I firmly believe that the people …
should speak on this issue. I believe marriage is between 1 man and 1
woman and I will fight for this.”
</p>
<p>
Ted Sporer, former Republican party chairman in Polk County, was
debating the possibilities of overturning the Supreme Court decision
more than 12 hours prior to that decision being announced.
</p>
<p>
Describing the expectation of some for a Democratically controlled
Iowa legislature to act as “pointless,” Sporer opined that the only
permanent solution is a Constitutional amendment. Due to Iowa law,
however, the earliest such an amendment could be placed on the ballot
would be 2012.
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span><span class="apple-style-span"></span></span>
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>&quot;Doctor Drain&quot; Threatens Rural Health Care in Iowa</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/03/16/doctor-drain-threatens-rural-health-care-iowa" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/03/16/doctor-drain-threatens-rural-health-care-iowa</id>
    <published>2009-03-17T08:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-03-17T00:23:43-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="health care" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="provider shortage" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Iowa's legislature and rural communities have yet to address the root causes of the doctor shortage in the state, including incentives for young rural Iowans to take the plunge into medical school.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
This month, the Mitchell County Regional Health Center in Osage
became the 14th Iowa hospital in as many years to stop offering
obstetrical services. Families in Osage expecting a child will need to
travel to neighboring cities for final prenatal exams and delivery in
hospitals that offer those services or seek other options.
</p>
<p>
Births in Iowa's hospitals have increased by nearly 10 percent in
the past 10 years, but access to obstetrical services has declined in
rural Iowa, as hospitals discontinue labor and delivery services.
</p>
<p>
It's a trend that is impacting rural areas not only in Iowa but across the United States.<span class="inline inline-right"></span>
</p>
<p>
A 2008 report from the Iowa <span class="inline inline-right"><a href="http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&amp;hl=en&amp;msa=0&amp;msid=104676906327610504909.0004635d1a1fe79dce783&amp;ll=42.114524,-93.383789&amp;spn=5.296973,9.931641&amp;z=7"><img class="image image-preview" src="/files/images/hospital_map_image-300x205.jpg" border="0" alt="Red pins represent Iowa hospitals that do not offer obstetrical services. Green pins are Iowa hospitals that continue to offer such services. Click image to access interactive Google map." title="Red pins represent Iowa hospitals that do not offer obstetrical services. Green pins are Iowa hospitals that continue to offer such services. Click image to access interactive Google map." width="300" height="205" /></a><span class="caption">Red pins represent Iowa hospitals that do not offer obstetrical services. Green pins are Iowa hospitals that continue to offer such services. Click image to access interactive Google map.</span></span>Department of Public Health notes that
of 181 OB/GYN physicians identified in the state, only 46 practice in
rural counties. The vast majority of the physicians are located in
Iowa's population centers - Polk, Linn, Johnson, Black Hawk, Dubuque
and Scott counties.
</p>
<p>
The same holds true for family practice physicians. And one county,
Taylor, has neither a family practice physician or an OB/GYN physician
listed.
</p>
<p>
The reason Mitchell County Regional and other rural hospitals say
they can no longer offer these services is a lack of physicians.
</p>
<p>
While there is no doubt that rural areas are experiencing physician
shortages, officials say that doctors need more than an invitation and
short-term incentives before they will begin a long-term practice in a
rural setting. While Iowa continues to pursue incentives like loan
forgiveness programs, the legislature and Iowa's rural communities have
yet to address the root causes of the shortage, including the state's
dismally low Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement rate and the lack of
encouragement and incentives for young rural Iowans to take the plunge
into medical school.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Physicians Alone Aren't Enough</strong>
</p>
<p>
&quot;It takes more than a doctor to deliver a baby,&quot; said Gloria Vermie,
director of the Iowa Department of Public Health's Office of Rural
Health. &quot;Sometimes when a hospital or a doctor stops offering
[obstetrical care] it isn't necessarily any one issue, but a
culmination of issues.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Vermie, who formerly served with the Kansas Department of Health,
said the Sunflower State has made strides in training and retaining
primary care physicians in rural areas with a specialized residency
education program.
</p>
<p>
“In a mid-sized town called Salina, they have the Smoky Hill Family
Medicine Residency Program,” she said. “It was specifically for
residential, rural-health physicians. A high percent of the doctors who
go through that program end up serving rural areas.”
</p>
<p>
The philosophy of <a href="http://www.smokyhillfmrp.org/">the Kansas program</a>,
she said, could be summed up as “grow your own,” because a high
percentage of doctors who chose to take part were natives of rural
areas. Following completion of the program, Smoky Hills boasts a 92
percent placement in rural settings.
</p>
<p>
“It’s a very wise thing for communities to begin doing,” she said.
“They can start to look at their existing students when they are in
junior high to see who might have that potential. They should think:
‘What can we do for these students right now to ensure that they can
get to medical school and then come back home?’”
</p>
<p>
The “grow your own” approach is something that excites University of
Iowa professor Kelley Donham. He teaches a course in rural health and
agricultural medicine through the university’s College of Public
Health. Donham has also  advocated, unsuccessfully, for the school to
begin a full-fledged training track that would focus on rural health
care, priming doctors to work in areas outside major cities.
</p>
<p>
“It’s quite clear what it takes to get people who want to go into
primary care medicine and into rural areas,” Donham said. “That is, you
get people who are oriented toward primary care who are <em>from</em>
rural areas. Better yet, these individuals need to have spouses that
are from that area. They have to have rural mentors and have a rural
experience. They need to have a sociological connection to that
population.”
</p>
<p>
Vermie believes that offering loan incentives to medical school
students is key to increasing the number of Iowa’s rural doctors. Such
loans are often forgivable if the student agrees to spend a certain
amount of time practicing in an underserved community. The loans are
important, she said, but they aren’t the solution for retaining doctors
in rural areas.
</p>
<p>
“Communities may need a higher level of education and training to do
the recruitment and retention,” she said. “We can’t mandate that a
physician stays in [a particular community], but if those local leaders
know all the right strategies to bring those doctors in and assure them
that the community will support them and that certain amenities are
present, then they may have a higher success rate.”
</p>
<p>
Bobbi Buckner Bentz is director of the Primary Care Office in IDPH’s
Bureau of Health Care Access. One of her duties is to review site
applications for the <a href="http://nhsc.hrsa.gov/">National Health Service Corps</a>,
a federal program that offers scholarships to medical professionals who
agree to practice in underserved areas. Since 1994, Iowa has offered a
similar program through the Bureau of Health Care Access that is called
<a href="http://www.idph.state.ia.us/hpcdp/primecarre.asp">PRIMECARRE</a>.
</p>
<p>
Due to increased marketing and recently approved federal stimulus
funds, the federal program should see significant increases this year.
Bentz has already reviewed 16 and is expecting several more before the
March 27 cut-off date.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Medcaid/Medicare rates key to stopping “doctor drain”</strong>
</p>
<p>
But loan programs aren’t enough to address the many other factors
that challenge doctors who practice in rural areas. In Iowa, the
state’s extremely low Medicaid/Medicare reimbursement rate, the ongoing
nursing shortage, increased liability issues and even limited rural
broadband access all create an environment that can make doctor
retention difficult, observers say. <span class="inline inline-right"><a href="http://iowaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/docs_by_county.jpg"><img class="image image-preview" src="/files/images/docs_by_county-300x229.jpg" border="0" alt="County-by-county listing of obstetric and primary care physicians in Iowa. Click to view larger graphic." title="County-by-county listing of obstetric and primary care physicians in Iowa. Click to view larger graphic." width="300" height="229" /></a><span class="caption">County-by-county listing of obstetric and primary care physicians in Iowa. Click to view larger graphic.</span></span>
</p>
<p>
Christian Fong is vice-chairman of the Generation Iowa Commission,
established by the state to attract and retain young professionals in
the state. He believes that the loan forgiveness program doesn’t offer
enough incentive for medical professionals to give up the pay increases
they can obtain in neighboring states with much higher
Medicaid/Medicare reimbursement rates.
</p>
<p>
“The loan forgiveness program, which has been the traditional way of
trying to keep [physicians] in rural areas, has been, for the most
part, a failure,” Fong said. “For medicine, sometimes you are dealing
with $250,000 of debt. But what is that much debt when you can make
$50,000 more a year by moving to Minnesota? The economics no longer
works out for loan forgiveness.”
</p>
<p>
The other piece of the puzzle, according to Fong, is what happens to
a community when the physician meets his or her commitment and moves on.
</p>
<p>
“If they leave, the community is often left with this huge hole,” he
said. “And it can be very difficult to re-recruit to those rural areas.
So, an OB/GYN that comes into a community begins to assemble a support
system. It’s no longer just a single doctor, but it is all the support
networks that go into having that doctor available. If that OB/GYN
leaves, the hub of that network is gone. What are the other people who
were hired as a part of that support system supposed to do?”
</p>
<p>
Last year, the Generation Iowa Commission <a href="http://www.iowalifechanging.com/generation/downloads/gen-iowa-report-2008-final.pdf">indicated</a> that the solution to Iowa’s “doctor drain” was increasing Medicare/Medicaid reimbursements.
</p>
<p>
“That’s going to be extremely difficult in this budget environment,”
Fong confessed. “But, until we make a commitment as a state to do it,
we are going to continue to see ‘doctor drain’ out of our state — and
particularly out of rural areas.”
</p>
<p>
U.S. Rep. Tom Latham, R-Alexander, who has been a significant voice
in the ongoing conversation about Iowa’s nursing shortage, believes at
least some of the burden placed on physicians and hospitals can be
alleviated with technological advances. Latham secured $95,000 in
funding for the Newborn Monitoring Initiative, a first-of-its-kind
telemedicine technology that has been spearheaded by Gunderson Lutheran
Health System and Gunderson Clinic in Decorah.
</p>
<p>
The system allows physicians to send real-time data from rural
clinics to medical center specialists. The data can help facilitate
consultations, improve coordination of care and give women and babies
in rural regions access to specialists that might otherwise not be
available without extended travel. Such advances can also help a family
practitioner in a rural setting from feeling isolated and overburdened.
</p>
<p>
Vermie, meanwhile, says that economic development strategies
currently employed by communities for potential business recruitment
and retention could be modified to apply to medical professionals.
</p>
<p>
“There needs to be a local discussion on how the communities can
appeal to these medical professionals — especially the young ones,” she
said. “How do you entice them? How do you appeal to them? How do we
cultivate the support services that will ensure this doctor will have a
good practice without being overburdened?” 
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Iowa Violence Victims May Pay a Price for Budget Shortfalls</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/01/12/iowa-violence-victims-may-pay-a-price-budget-shortfalls" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/01/12/iowa-violence-victims-may-pay-a-price-budget-shortfalls</id>
    <published>2009-01-13T08:00:56-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-01-12T22:01:14-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="domestic violence" />
    <category term="economic insecurity" />
    <category term="intimate partner violence" />
    <category term="rape and sexual assault" />
    <category term="survivors" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Iowans facing domestic violence are currently able to access crisis counseling and shelters. But if the state doesn’t find a way to maintain $4 million in funding, all that could change.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
Iowans facing domestic violence or sexual assault are currently able
to access crisis counseling, shelters and long-term support from a
local program within driving distance. But if the state doesn’t soon
find a way to maintain the $4 million that funds the programs, all that
could change.
</p>
<p>
Local sexual assault and domestic violence programs rely on a
combination of state, federal and private funds to maintain operation.
Although the state provided funding for these programs as early as
1979, a number of changes and tight state budget years have
dramatically eroded available state funding.
</p>
<p>
In 2002 the state budget to support these programs was eliminated,
and nine programs were forced to close or merge. Subsequently money was
taken from the Iowa Attorney General’s Victim Compensation Fund as a 
stop-gap measure that would allow the remaining programs to continue
operating. But the Victim Compensation Fund can no longer support the
domestic violence and sexual assault victim assistance programs.
</p>
<p>
Realizing that the Victim Compensation Fund would not be able to
serve its intended purpose — providing assistance to victims of violent
crime — and continue to fund the domestic and sexual assault assistance
programs, the <a href="http://www.state.ia.us/government/ag" target="_blank">Iowa attorney general’s office</a>, the <a href="http://www.icadv.org/" target="_blank">Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence</a> and the <a href="http://www.iowacasa.org/" target="_blank">Iowa Coalition Against Sexual Assault</a> began pressing state officials several years ago for an independent budget line item.
</p>
<p>
While mindful of the current budget crunch, the dependent agencies
also know that fiscal year 2009 will be the last year that Iowa’s
domestic violence and sexual assault programs will receive $4 million
via the Victim Assistance Grant line item.
</p>
<p>
“Something has to give,” said Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller. “We
have advised the Legislature for several years that the Compensation
Fund, which comes from various fines and penalties paid by criminals,
would not always be able to fully fund both programs. Now we’ve hit
that crunch time. We need the Legislature’s direct appropriation of
funds again — as it did in years past — for the crucial network of
local programs all over Iowa.”
</p>
<p>
Miller, who led a news conference Wednesday at the State Capitol,
said the 31 programs are located in 27 counties, but they serve the
entire state. Despite the budget crunch, Miller said the current
funding levels must be maintained.
</p>
<p>
“It is difficult for me to ask for this funding in these hard
financial times, but I believe this is a matter of justice and a matter
of safety,” he said. “It’s a matter of justice because Iowa has a long
record of assisting victims of crime, and not just punishing and
rehabilitating criminals. And it’s a matter of safety and security and
recovery for victims.”
</p>
<p>
The programs, according to Miller, provide “indispensable,
life-saving services” that include helping victims with safety plans,
finding safe houses for women and children, guiding people through the
criminal justice system and helping those who fall prey to violent
crime cope with the unforeseen costs of being a victim.
</p>
<p>
Budget requests, filed by the attorney general’s office in October,
include a $3.2 million direct appropriation to the programs, ending the
mandated link to the Victims Compensation Fund. The attorney general’s
office would retain the legal authority to transfer money from the fund
to the local programs, but only if such transfers were fiscally
possible.
</p>
<p>
“This would put the Compensation Fund on a more solid footing and
would permit the Office to pay victims their full benefits on a prompt
basis,” wrote Miller in his October request letter.
</p>
<p>
Miller also requested an additional $850,000 for local crime victim
service programs. This would provide $850,000 for fiscal year 2010 that
was moved in fiscal year 2009 from the Forfeited Property Fund to the
grant program fund to replace lost federal support.
</p>
<p>
According to Beth Barnhill, executive director of the Iowa Coalition
Against Sexual Assault, rural Iowans will likely feel the brunt of any
program cuts first.
</p>
<p>
“The programs most at risk are the rural programs that are heavily
reliant on state funding,” she said. “They are unlikely to have local
resources to make up the shortfall.”
</p>
<p>
Last year the Crime Victim Compensation Program served 5,249 Iowa
victims of crime and paid $7.2 million of their out-of-pocket
expenses.  The expenses included things such as victim counseling,
medical care, funeral and burial expenses, child care required for
court proceedings or medical treatment, and compensation of wages lost
due to crime-related injuries or court appearances.
</p>
<p>
During that same time frame Iowa’s local domestic abuse and sexual
abuse programs served 26,934 victims — 20,042 women, 5,294 children and
1,058 men. The programs provided 100,814 nights of safe shelter to
4,416 victims and children.
</p>
<p>
Local programs provide emergency shelters, counseling, medical
advocacy, crisis hotlines, guidance for victims going through criminal
justice proceedings and many other individualized services. Most of the
local programs serve large geographical regions — some up to six or
eight counties — with small, low-paid staffs of dedicated professionals.
</p>
<p>
On Sept. 27, 2007, the Iowa programs participated in a 24-hour
“snapshot” or requested services in the state. The count from that day
showed that services were provided to 813 individuals. But there were
an additional 114 requests for services that could not be met because
of a lack of resources.
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Iowa Becomes Battleground in Fight for Marriage Equality</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/12/08/iowa-becomes-battleground-fight-marriage-equality" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/12/08/iowa-becomes-battleground-fight-marriage-equality</id>
    <published>2008-12-09T08:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-08T20:29:46-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="LGBT issues" />
    <category term="marriage equality" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Iowa's next turn in the national spotlight begins today, when the state Supreme Court hears arguments on same-sex marriage.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
Because of the state's first-in-the-nation presidential caucuses,
Iowans are no strangers to national media attention, power struggles of
special interest groups and hot-button debates. In nearly any diner
throughout the state, conversations on ethanol subsidies, the decline
of Main Street and foreign policy are more commonplace than not.
</p>
<p>
The state's next turn in the national spotlight begins on today, when the state Supreme Court hears arguments on same-sex
marriage.
</p>
<p>
The legal drama has been three years in the making. In December 2005, the gay rights group <a href="http://www.lambdalegal.org/" target="_blank">Lambda Legal</a>
filed a lawsuit on behalf of six same-sex couples who sought the right
to marry in Iowa. The suit was later amended to include three children
whose parents were plaintiffs. The lawsuit argued that it would be
unlawful to ban same-sex couples from marriage based on the equal
protection and due process guarantees of the Iowa constitution. The
state's Defense of Marriage Act, passed in 1998 by a 40-9 margin in the
Senate and an 89-10 margin in the House, defines marriage as being
solely between a man and a woman.
</p>
<p>
On Aug. 30, 2007, an Iowa District Court in Polk County agreed with
the plaintiffs and ruled that it was unconstitutional to deny couples
the right to marry.
</p>
<p>
&quot;Couples, such as [the] Plaintiffs, who are otherwise qualified to
marry one another may not be denied licenses to marry or certificates
of marriage or in any other way prevented from entering into a civil
marriage ... by reason of the fact that both persons comprising such a
couple are of the same sex,&quot; wrote Iowa District Court Judge Robert
Hanson in his ruling.
</p>
<p>
Although Hanson placed a &quot;hold&quot; on his ruling before even 24 hours
had passed, dozens of same-sex couples lined up for licenses. One
couple, Sean Fritz and Tim McQuillan, both undergraduates at Iowa State
University, were able to maneuver through the system quickly enough to
become spouses in Iowa's first - and only - legal same-sex marriage.
</p>
<p>
A Polk County attorney appealed the decision to the Iowa Supreme Court, which has scheduled oral arguments next week.
</p>
<p>
In the weeks prior to the scheduled oral arguments, Lambda Legal and <a href="http://www.oneiowa.org/" target="_blank">One Iowa</a>,
an equality advocacy group, presented public forums to discuss the
status of the case and encourage those Iowans who support marriage
equality to voice their opinion.
</p>
<p>
&quot;I think one of the misconceptions is that the lawsuit seeks to
change what various religious organizations are doing,&quot; said Camilla
Taylor, a senior staff attorney with Lambda Legal who argued the case
in District Court. &quot;All we are actually talking about is
government-issued marriage licenses. Religious institutions have never
been required to perform or condone civil marriage, and this lawsuit
doesn't change that.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Rev. Rich McCarty, one of the panel members at the Iowa City forum,
echoed this sentiment in a tongue-in-cheek fashion by stating that
&quot;religious communities are free to discriminate against whomever they
want to.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Those speaking at the forum were hopeful that Iowa, a state that
granted the marriage rights of interracial couples more than 100 years
before the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case <em>Loving v. Virginia</em>,
will once again flex its pioneering muscles. It is a hope voiced by
Mary Mascher, a Democratic member of the Iowa House of Representatives
from Iowa City.
</p>
<p>
&quot;I think our constitution clearly, clearly prohibits [a ban on
same-sex marriage],&quot; said Mascher, one of several legislators and local
elected officials who signed on to a friend-of-the-court brief in
support of the lawsuit. &quot;[The Defense of Marriage Act] is
discriminatory and I voted against that law when it was put on the
books for that very reason. I thought it was unconstitutional and I
believe that's what the Supreme Court is going to rule.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Mascher knows that the issue has become a political hot potato,
especially after the November general election when ballot propositions
in other states like California were successful in banning same-sex
marriage.
</p>
<p>
A total of 24 friend-of-the court briefs have been filed. Sixteen of
those are from organizations and individuals who believe Iowa's Defense
of Marriage Act, passed in 1998, is unconstitutional. Eight briefs are
supportive of the gay marriage ban, most of them from national
organizations.
</p>
<p>
Sixteen Republican state legislators joined in filing a
friend-of-the-court brief in support of banning same-sex marriage in
Iowa when the case was before Iowa District Court last year. Only five
of the 16 have added their names to similar brief in the Supreme Court
case. Citing their interest in &quot;maintaining a proper separation of
government powers,&quot; Reps. Dwayne Alons, Carmine Boal and Betty DeBoef
joined with Sens. Nancy Boettger and James Hahn on a brief authored by
the Alliance Defense Fund, a legal alliance created in 1994 by Focus on
the Family and more than 29 additional Christian ministries, as a
response to the American Civil Liberties Union, to &quot;aggressively defend
religious liberty.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Jim Campbell, litigation counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund,
provided the crux of the opposition brief by questioning the lower
court's decision to reject testimony prior to ruling.
</p>
<p>
&quot;The government should promote and encourage strong families,&quot;
Campbell said. &quot;The expert testimony excluded by the court was crucial
to establishing why Iowa's Defense of Marriage Act does that and why
the act is completely constitutional. The people of Iowa, through their
elected legislators, took their stand on marriage as a union of one
woman and one man when they passed this Act in 1998.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Mascher thinks supporters of the gay marriage ban from outside the state &quot;would tread upon our constitution.&quot;
</p>
<p>
&quot;Part of me says that is their right of freedom of speech and that
everybody can come here and say what they want and speak their piece.
But at the same time, this is Iowa. I think we as Iowans have definite
feelings and opinions about that too. I don't want to be a part of
anything that would take rights away in our constitution. That would be
the first time in the history of Iowa that we've ever put an amendment
to that constitution that took rights away. If you think about the
enormity of that, it really gives you pause in terms of thinking that
this would be something that we would even consider, and that there are
people who would try to destroy our constitution in that way.&quot;
</p>
<p>
A perhaps strange bedfellow in all of this is Gov. Chet Culver.
Prior to the November general election - indeed, prior to the beginning
of the 2008 legislative session - Culver <a href="http://iowaindependent.com/1842/supreme-court-opinion-in-gay-adoption-case-has-culver-urging-calm" target="_blank">claimed</a>
he was in favor of calling a special legislative session to deal with a
Supreme Court verdict that would allow same-sex marriage in Iowa.
</p>
<p>
Mascher, while not completely convinced that Culver has ruled out this strategy, cautions that it could be politically unwise.
</p>
<p>
&quot;What I think the governor has to understand and appreciate is that
he is one branch of government and our legislature is another branch of
government,&quot; Mascher said. &quot;In order for anything to happen and occur,
it can't just happen with his signature. He doesn't have any kind of
veto power over a constitutional amendment. He can call us back. We
don't have to come. We don't have to do anything. So, I think he would
do that at his own peril because it would be embarrassing to call us
back and then not have anything be done. I don't think that politically
he is willing to take that kind of a risk.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Oral arguments are expected to begin at 10 a.m. on Dec. 9 in the
Iowa Judicial Branch Building in Des Moines. The opposing parties will
have 30 minutes in which to make their arguments.
</p>
<p>
More information regarding oral arguments, the trial court ruling and other proceedings can be found on the <a href="http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Varnum_v_Brien/index.asp" target="_blank">Iowa Judicial Branch Web site</a>.
There is no mandated time frame for the court to make its ruling
following the oral arguments. Most close to the case anticipate it will
take several months.
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Behind Nebraska’s Abandoned Kids, A National Shortage of Mental Health Care</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/24/behind-nebraska%E2%80%99s-abandoned-kids-a-national-shortage-mental-health-care" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/24/behind-nebraska%E2%80%99s-abandoned-kids-a-national-shortage-mental-health-care</id>
    <published>2008-12-01T08:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-30T20:43:52-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="mental health" />
    <category term="parenting issues" />
    <category term="women&#039;s mental health" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><!--paging_filter-->The state of Nebraska faces a situation most parents can’t comprehend. At last count 34 children, ranging in age from 20 months to 17 years, have been left at Nebraska hospitals under the auspices of a vaguely written “Safe Haven” law.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>
The state of Nebraska has faced a situation most parents can't comprehend.
</p>
<p>
At last count 36 children, ranging in age from 20 months to 17 years, were left at Nebraska hospitals under the auspices of a vaguely written and short-lived &quot;Safe Haven&quot; law.
</p>
<p>
The Nebraska law, which was signed in February and became effective in July, was to be the last, given that all other states had already enacted similar legislation. During debate, however, Nebraska lawmakers took a unique slant.Instead of attaching an age to the law - ages that some lawmakers deemed &quot;arbitrary&quot; - the legislators opted to write the law so that any &quot;child&quot; could be handed over to the state at designated drop-off points, such as hospitals, without any legal recourse against the child's guardian.
</p>
<p>
As a result, parents drove several hundred miles - from as far away as Miami-Dade County in Florida and Pima County in Arizona - in order to leave their children with state officials in Nebraska. Although Nebraska lawmakers have since re-written the law so that only infants 30-days-old or less are covered, the legislative gaff has potentially shined a light on a national crisis.
</p>
<p>
According to statistical information on 34 of the children released by the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, the children left in Nebraska come from various socio-economic and ethnic backgrounds. Twenty-two are considered white, 11 are considered black and one is Native American. Twenty of the 34 children are between the ages of 13 and 17. 
</p>
<p>
They have three things in common.
</p>
<p>
1) Thirty-two of the children resided in or near an urban area.<br />
<br />
2) Thirty of the children were living in a single-parent home.<br />
<br />
3) Thirty of the children had previously received mental health services,<br />
with 11 of those receiving treatment above an outpatient level.
</p>
<p>
This last statistic does not surprise George Estle, executive director of Tanager Place, a private nonprofit organization in Cedar Rapids that provides services to children and families experiencing social and psychological needs.
</p>
<p>
&quot;If we would have had this same law in Iowa, the same thing would have happened here,&quot; Estle said. &quot;I suspect that if we really look at the kids<br />
who are being dropped off in Nebraska - particularly the adolescents - many of those will be young people who have serious emotional problems. My hunch is that parents are utterly frustrated at not being able to access services. So, they are using that law as an act of desperation because they can't get services.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Such was definitely the case for former Iowa resident Carrisa Gatley, a single parent who has an 11-year-old son with severe mental disabilities. She hasn't left her kid in Nebraska but she admits she could imagine it.<br />
<br />
&quot;Shortly after [our son] turned 3, my husband left,&quot; Gatley said in a telephone interview Wednesday. &quot;I didn't blame him. I actually envied him - that he could escape the hell that came with trying to deal with everything.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Gatley said it wasn't just her son's violent episodes, which have become increasingly dangerous as he's grown older, but the constant and often depressing task of fighting with the insurance company, medication changes, food restrictions and trying to locate service providers. <br />
&quot;We left Iowa about six years ago because there were no doctors available in our area,&quot; she said. &quot;Now we live in an urban area where services aren't plentiful, but adequate. At least I know that when there is a really bad day, I'll have someone to turn to - someone who helps us through the rough spots. Without that support, I might very well have also made the drive into Nebraska.&quot;
</p>
 
<p>
Estle, who does not know the Gatley family, said he can understand the frustrations of parents who live with children afflicted with mental illness. He said he sees parents every day who are frustrated and desperate to find help for their children.
</p>
<p>
And that frustration doesn't end with parents. Care providers - the few that remain - have difficulty placing the children who graduate from acute-care facilities, such as the handful available in hospital psychiatric wards or in the Tanager Place long-term care program.
</p>
<p>
&quot;Years ago, when the state of Iowa decided to carve out the mental health care portion of Medicaid, they gave it to a for-profit-based care company,&quot; Estle explained. &quot;What happened immediately after that was the reduction of
the number of acute-care beds available. So, what you saw was a very rapid decline in the hospital-based beds for kids in the state.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Estle said that while such changes have resulted in fewer psychiatric beds for patients of all ages, the cuts in the number of psychiatric beds for children has been most severe.
</p>
<p>
&quot;Those [programs] that are left struggle,&quot; he said. &quot;For example, St. Luke's Hospital in Cedar Rapids has inpatient beds for children, but they often struggle with kids they can't move to another level of care because those needed services don't exist.&quot;
</p>
<p>
When that happens, the children often leave the hospital in their parents'care - whether or not the parents are in a position or have the resources to continue the child's treatment.
</p>
<p>
&quot;It's the same problem we have with our long-term psychiatric medical institution,&quot; Estle said. &quot;We can treat kids, but then we need to be able to move them to lesser levels of care. Those lesser levels of care really just
aren't available. Because of this the whole system gets kind of jammed up, if you will.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Parents who hope their children will have access to outpatient services once they've left an acute-care facility may find that such services are limited, if available at all.
</p>
<p>
&quot;For those who live in Cedar Rapids, we have a full-time child psychiatrist on staff here at Tanager Place to do outpatient care,&quot; said Estle. &quot;I think one of the private psychiatric groups has a couple as well. But that's it.<br />
If you want a child psychiatrist, those are the only ones available. Across the entire state, there are only a handful of child psychiatrists available. It's just a real problem of shortage of services and shortages of professionals.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Iowa isn't the only state that is coming up short when dealing with mental health issues for children, according to Estle.
</p>
<p>
&quot;I really do think that what has happened in Nebraska is symptomatic of a bigger problem,&quot; he says. &quot;It's a problem that we have in Iowa and a problem that is in many other areas of the country. If you look at what is available to those suffering with mental illness in our state, it basically comes down to some traditional outpatient care that varies sporadically across the state. There are a few inpatient and acute-care beds left, but not many.
</p>
<p>
There are far fewer than there used to be. There are some programs like Tanager across the state, but that's about it. There's nothing else out there.&quot;
</p>
<p>
The situation is especially dire in the Midwest, where the population is less dense and there are fewer opportunities both for care and for training.
</p>
<p>
&quot;In the state of Iowa you have one residency program available at the University of Iowa. That's it. One program with limited slots,&quot; Estle said.<br />
&quot;And then, quite frankly, the reimbursement in Iowa for those professionals is really low. So there is really no incentive for those folks to stay here or come here.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Although the state Legislature has acknowledged Iowa has a crisis in relation to the availability of psychiatrists and psychologists, Estle isn't seeing much movement at a state level to correct the system's deficiencies. The reimbursement given to the Tanager Place psychiatric medical institution
for children - a total of $167 a day - is the lowest in the nation. Estle does believe the mental health system in Iowa can be fixed, but it will take actions by a state Legislature that has previously been unwilling to act and now has the added pressures of flood recovery and budget shortfalls.
</p>
<p>
&quot;We've not done much in the state to develop a good system of care for kids with mental illness,&quot; he said. &quot;I think that's what we have to do first. We have to design and fund a good system of care in Iowa, and we've got to figure out a way to attract professionals to staff it.&quot;<br />
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Huckabee Robocalls Iowans to Ask About Abortion Views</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/24/huckabee-robocalls-iowans-ask-about-abortion-views" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/24/huckabee-robocalls-iowans-ask-about-abortion-views</id>
    <published>2008-11-25T08:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-24T21:43:17-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Lynda Waddington</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Election 2008" />
    <category term="Mike Huckabee" />
    <category term="Barack Obama" />
    <category term="FOCA" />
    <category term="Freedom of Choice Act" />
    <category term="robocalls" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Former Gov. Mike Huckabee robocalls Iowans to identify politically active opponents of abortion and to request contributions.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
It seems
that the medal for first robocall in Iowa following the 2008 general
election goes to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee.
</p>
<p>
Huckabee's recorded voice is used on the call, which is a phone
survey that, based on the questions asked, seeks to identify
politically active opponents of abortion and to request contributions.
</p>
<p>
Call recipients are asked if they have ever voted, if they agreed
with President-elect Barack Obama and if they ever contributed to a
political campaign or candidate. The call goes on to discuss the U.S.
Supreme Court ban on so-called partial birth abortion, then brings up
the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:S.2020:" target="_blank">Freedom of Choice Act</a>,
legislation designed to codify reproductive rights. Huckabee's voice
goes on to inform callers that if this proposed legislation passes that
there will be no limits on abortion.  Then Huckabee requests a donation.
</p>
<p>
Iowans who received the phone survey said the funds were to go to the National Right to Life Council.
</p>
<p>
The call reportedly appeared on recipients' caller identification
screens as &quot;Call Center, VA - (703) 263-1658.&quot; This same information
has been <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/17/the-amazing-story-of-saxb_n_144307.html" target="_blank">connected</a>
to calls received by Georgia residents, which have been described as
push-polls against Jim Martin, the Democratic U.S. Senate candidate in
that state who will face Republican Saxby Chambliss in a Dec. 2 runoff.
In Georgia the calls were paid for by the Americans in Contact PAC, a
group which lists its mission as being identification of social and
fiscal conservatives throughout America and engaging them at the
grassroots level in the political process of elections and legislation
at all levels of government.
</p>
<p>
This particular PAC also conducted <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Another_robocall.html#comments" target="_blank">calls</a> during the month of October that attacked Obama's economy stance. According to a press release on the group's <a href="http://www.americansincontact.org/" target="_blank">Web site</a>,
the PAC kicked off a &quot;grassroots campaign in the state of California to
identify hundreds of thousands of supporters of traditional marriage
who will help protect Proposition Eight,&quot; the recently passed ballot
initiative that outlawed same-sex marriage in California.
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
