<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Fred Block's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2720"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2720/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2720/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2009-06-25T08:42:23-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Mark Sanford, George Tiller, and the Politics of Hypocrisy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/25/mark-sanford-george-tiller-and-politics-hypocrisy" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/25/mark-sanford-george-tiller-and-politics-hypocrisy</id>
    <published>2009-06-25T08:19:11-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-06-25T08:42:23-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Fred Block</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Leading Voices" />
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="culture wars" />
    <category term="extramarital affairs" />
    <category term="hypocrisy" />
    <category term="murder of Dr. George Tiller" />
    <category term="Republicans" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Charging fallen politicians with hypocrisy fundamentally misses the point that has been in dispute during the culture wars.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
Each
time another Republican apostle of conservative family values is revealed
to be a philandering hypocrite, it is tempting to lash out at their
inability to live the values that they espouse.   The hypocrisy
charge is certainly accurate.  John Ensign, Senator from Nevada who
recently disclosed an affair with a campaign aide,  said that if he
was caught in a scandal like the one that befell Larry Craig, he would
resign.  When Mark Sanford, the Republican Governor of South
Carolina, was in the House of Representatives, he enthusiastically
supported the impeachment of Bill Clinton for his extra-marital affair,
as did Newt Gingrich and Bob Livingston who were carrying on their own
affairs at the time.
</p>
<p>
But the
charge of hypocrisy fundamentally misses the point that has been in dispute during the culture wars. The reality is that we are all of
us human, and many of us are tempted to do things that violate our own
deepest moral values or Biblical injunctions.  This is the
point that disgraced public figures invariably invoke when they ask for
forgiveness.  Jesse Jackson probably said it best: &quot;God is not
finished with me&quot; meaning that he is a flawed and imperfect creature who
is prone to do and say things that he knows he should
not.  Whether it is Gary Hart, Bill Clinton, Jim Bakker,
Ted Haggard, Eliot Spitzer, David Vitter, Mark Foley, Newt Gingrich, or
Bob Livingston, they invariably make the same point and it is persuasive
because we know that it is true.
</p>
<p>
But it is
this truth that the advocates of traditional values systematically
deny.  They insist that the problem is not that we are human; the
problem is that we are simply not trying hard enough to live up to the
rules that the deity has laid out for us.  And they go on to insist
that human laws must be structured to reinforce the divine
commandments.  They say that not only must we not allow gay people
to marry; we must be true to a conservative reading of Scriptures
and  discourage any manifestation of homosexuality.   And
this is also why they are so insistent that abortion represents a mortal
sin.  Abortion and contraception are wrong because they free people
to engage in adultery and nonmarital sex without suffering the
consequences of unintended pregnancies.  Without these consequences,
even more people will be tempted into sinful practices. 
</p>
<p>
But this
makes no sense.  If we are all like the politicians who get
caught -- frail, imperfect human beings who cannot actually live according
to these Biblical rules -- then it is only logical that the laws that we
construct together should reflect a compassionate recognition of that
fact. This means abandoning the ancient prejudice against
homosexuality.  It also means that when a woman happens to follow
her heart and gets pregnant, she should be able to correct the mistake
through an abortion.  But, of course, the conservative culture
warriors cannot see this point.  Their claim is that when we relax
our laws, we will inevitably head down the slippery slope to Sodom and
Gomorrah.  As Senator Santorum famously argued, if we start to
tolerate gay sexuality, that will immediately give permission for
advocates or man-on-dog relations and any other conceivable
perversion.
</p>
<p>
In short,
the conservative culture warriors understand that they are espousing a
doctrine that upholds impossible standards.  But they do so out of
the dubious conviction that without those particular standards, all
standards would disappear.   For centuries, this exercise in
hypocrisy had a certain rationality because it was connected with
the sexual double standard.  Men could not realistically be expected
to restrict their sexual impulses only to the marriage bed, even in
those religions that allowed them multiple wives.  But the demand
for sexual purity could be enforced on women with the most extreme
consequences for any lapses.  This, of course, is the source of the
original animus against abortion and birth control; they threaten to
unleash women's full exercise of their own sexuality.
</p>
<p>
But the
culture warriors in the U.S. have had to pretend that they no longer
embrace the sexual double standard.   Values of gender equality
are now so deeply rooted in the culture that the double standard will not
fly.  If religious leaders were to say openly that men can fool
around and women cannot, their female congregants would quickly
depart.  So they have been forced to update and revise the doctrine
and pretend that both men and women can live up to these impossible
standards.  They have gone from demonizing women for getting
abortions to the new slogan that abortion demeans and degrades
women.   But enforcing this type of hypocritical morality still
requires that someone play the role of  demon -a representative of
evil who wants to turn a once decent society into a land of uncontrolled
sexuality.
</p>
<p>
These new
demons are, of course, the abortion providers.  Men and women who
compassionately provide a medical service that actual women need either
because of unwanted pregnancies or serious medical indications have been
identified as the spawn of Satan.  The women who go to these doctors
have now been identified as innocents, since it is no longer politically
expedient to label them with a scarlet letter.  But effectively, the
same splitting goes on.  In the old days, boys would be boys, but
women who lapsed from purity were candidates for stoning.  Now,
however, boys are still boys, but we stone the abortion providers. 
George Tiller, the Kansas physician who provided late term
abortions,  died for the sins of Mark Sanford and all the other
right wing theocrats.
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
