STOKING FIRE: The Chastity-Prolife Connection
by Eleanor J. Bader, RH Reality Check
February 8, 2010 - 10:00am (Print)
Eleanor Bader writes a monthly column for RH Reality Check.
Generation Life, a national Catholic youth group founded in 1999 by ultra-right winger Brandi Swindell, sees its raison dâĂȘtre as pushing âthe chastity-prolife connection."
The West Chester, Pennsylvania-headquartered group âsidewalk counselsâ outside the Philadelphia Womenâs Center at least once a month. Itâs the usual taunts and vitriol, say clinic staff and volunteers, but with a twist--a message that can only be described as befuddling: âChastity is for lovers.â
âThey lecture us when they picket, saying, âGod doesnât want sex outside of marriage. He gave us sex to propagate. Be chaste,â â Escort Co-coordinator Chris Hill says. They also target particular demographics with messages that they hope will resonate. African Americans patients, for example, are warned that they might be murdering the next Barack Obama. Similarly, men who accompany their girlfriends or wives to the facility are hit with machismo: âReal men step up. They donât kill their babies.â
And thatâs the crux of Generation Lifeâs mission, the preaching of an ossified formula of gendered behavior that is both intensely rigid and rooted in fantasy. Their website, www.generationlife.org, lays out the basics. In a section for young women, the instructions read like a roadmap for submission. âA lady is modest, pure, and chaste, understands chastity, values her sexuality, appreciates her fertilityâŠKnows her body is a Temple of the Holy SpiritâŠShe loves babies and nurtures her family. She is the heart of her home, finds strength in her husband, understands sacrificial love, and is happy and content.â In short, the message is simple: Suck it up, girls, and remember the hierarchy.  Women obey men and men obey God.
But thatâs not all. In The World According to Generation Life, âDressing modestly is the frontline to chastity. It isnât fair to say one thing to a guy with verbal language and another with your body or clothes language. If you make a commitment to living chastity, wearing skimpy, tight, or revealing clothes will make it hard for you to attract the right kind of guys to date.â
You can almost see Generation Lifeâs theoreticians shrugging their shoulders and grinning impishly, as if to say, âboys will be boys,â penile-driven creatures unable to resist the lust that has bedeviled red-blooded [read straight] males, from peasants to presidents, since time immemorial.
âGuys are stimulated differently than girls,â the website adds. âOpen mouth kissing will lead a guy to become sexually aroused but a girl will simply feel more affection toward himâŠGuys have a higher sex drive and girls have a higher love drive.â This dichotomy, Generation Life reports, requires ârealâ men to not only be chaste, but to be chivalrous. âGirls donât want to be the ones to initiate. They want a guy who will initiate.â
Itâs like a fairy tale, with Knights in Shining Armor protecting needy damsels from external threats. The trick, of course, is having a quiver full of children and opposing abortion and family planning.
Itâs worth underscoring that opposition to abortion is a key tool in Generation Lifeâs ideological toolbox. Indeed, itâs the hook used to snare kids into paying attention to the groupâs larger political messagesâopposition to gender equality and sexual freedom. In fact, in the workshops they offer in 7th and 8th grade parochial school classrooms across the country, gory pictures of allegedly aborted fetuses are used to gross out students. Itâs then a short leap from revulsionâafter all, few of us relish looking at pictures of bloody body partsâto the promotion of celibacy until marriage. Of course, 12 and 13 year olds who donât know better are predictably receptive to black-and-white rules about âchaste living,â dating, and sexual propriety.
Furthermore, few middle schoolers question the behavioral tenets that Generation Life puts forward, all of them enforced and controlled by girls and women. Among them: necklines should not be lower than four fingers below the collarbone; garments should not be sheer, or made of thin material or spandex; snappy backs, halters, and backless dresses or blouses should be avoided; tank tops should be covered by a jacket or sweater; shirts should not be shorter than four fingers above the knees; and pants should not be tight or form-fitting. If there are controls on acceptable male apparel, theyâre not listed on Generation Lifeâs roster of donâts.
Itâs one of the few areas in which the groupâs behavioral restrictions are in any way opaque. According to Amanda Kitterly, Director of Clinic Affairs at the Philadelphia Womenâs Center, Gen Life protesters not only impose restrictions on how members are supposed to dress, the leadership views the world as a place where hard-and-fast principles can be applied to relationships, as if right and wrong are as clear-cut as day and night, straight and crooked. âThey try to make good women feel bad by standing outside the clinic and saying things like, âWe can tell you whatâs right for your life. Youâre wrong to have an abortion,â â Kitterly says. âIf you ask them what they hope to accomplish by protesting at the clinic, theyâll tell you that theyâre there to preach Godâs love. But itâs so clear to me that this is not about either God or love. Itâs about owning women and governing what women do. Itâs about judgment and hatred.âÂ
Lastly, please note that Generation Life is not anomalous. Instead, itâs one of several âpro-chastity-prolifeâ groups, among them, True Love Waits, The Abstinence Clearinghouse, and lovematters.com.
This issue always frustrates me.
For an equally frustrating exploration of modesty (one which is not necessarily ANTI-feminist) try A Return To Modesty by Wendy Shalit.
treating sex as if it is for procreation only, instead of supporting people's freedom and right to have sex for other purposes, has the effect of *increasing* abortions.
because if sex is only for those who have official approval to procreate, then women who become pregnant in "unauthorized" situations will be heavily stigmatized, as will their children.
On Common Ground Columnist & Editor, Nonviolent Choice Directory
The pro-abortion movement has never been above fabricating or exaggerating numbers to fit a purpose. Much of the loss of government funding for abstinence education could be blamed on exaggerated numbers.
With government funding vanishing for programs that prevent abortions and value a pro-life perspective, how are ministries and other non-profits to fund their efforts?
Many of the Christian Ministries I work with are dismayed to find that few foundations, even Christian Foundations with conservative values, are interested in truly saving babies.
I am hopeful that as 2010 progresses foundations will recognize this need and bgin to respond to the changes in government funds to address the issue.
My company, Here-4-You Christian Grant Consulting is working with crisis pregnancy centers; single parent programs, adoption resource centers, residential services for pregnant teens, and other programs that are in desperate need of funding to continue the work they have started.
With government funding vanishing for programs that prevent abortions
and value a pro-life perspective, how are ministries and other
non-profits to fund their efforts?
Â
 Tithing.
The only difference between the American anti-abortion movement and the Taliban is about 8,000 miles.
Dr Warren Hern, MD
The pro-abortion movement
Who's that? I don't know of anybody who's promoting abortions. Even China has pretty much abandoned their failed policies there.
 Much of the loss of government funding for abstinence education could be blamed on exaggerated numbers.
It was really, REALLY a bad idea to use all those inaccuracies in the curriculum, wasn't it? There just something about a bald-faced lie like "50% of the women who have abortions commit suicide" or "HIV can travel right through a condom" that leads the program open to criticism from reality based nitpickers. Telling the truth might have worked -- too bad they didn't try that.
Many of the Christian Ministries I work with are dismayed to find that few foundations, even Christian Foundations with conservative values, are interested in truly saving babies.
Those foundations may be very interested in 'saving babies', but apparently the grants which you are paid to prepare aren't convincing them your clients are accomplishing that. My experience with foundations is that they interested in proof of actual effectiveness, not just providing a living to someone who has the right ideology.
You might want to encourage your clients to provide information you can incorporate that shows that they are having a positive effect in women's lives and actually 'saving babies'. Long-term follow-up studies are always impressive. Assuming they actually are having a positive effect in women's lives and saving babies, of course.
It's also really impressive to the foundations when the people who want to pay themselves a salary out of their grant monies have actual credentials from a reputable school and actual work experience in the field instead of just being self-qualified because they are 'Christian' and 'ProLife'.Â
My company, Here-4-You Christian Grant Consulting is working with crisis pregnancy centers; single parent programs, adoption resource centers, residential services for pregnant teens, and other programs that are in desperate need of funding to continue the work they have started.
I think it's wonderful that as a professional you've chosen a field where you can make a living providing services to organizations that are doing work you think is really needed.
I also think it's wonderful that government funds aren't being used to pay for any of it.
You seem to be soliciting especially with your opening propaganda tactic of using the misnomer "pro-abortion" and then suggesting funding is a result of a fudging of the results/numbers. In fact, the fudging of results, if there were a movement to blame, lies solely in the lap of the those who promoted abstinence programs.Â
Further evidence of shameless soliciting begins with "My company . . ."
Here's a bit of advice: Solicit elsewhere!Â
You mean, those institutions that disguise themselves as clinics and lie to and intimidate any woman or girl who walks in their door? That is actually a GOOD thing.
Catseye ( (|) )
It's a good thing that CPC's are being defunded.
Catseye ( (|) )
" . . . theyâll tell you that theyâre there to preach Godâs love. But it's so clear to me that this is not about either God or love. Itâs about owning women and governing what women do. Itâs about judgment and hatred."
The Philadelphia, PA clinic anti choicers mirror the hateful, terroristic, stigmatizing behavior at the clinic in Allentown PA. One in particular has gone on record for calling women murderers; another has quite bluntly acknowledged that their record of saving is practically nil. He has also said that he wants women to remember walking into the clinic as if they were walking into the gates of Hell.
Kinda' takes a big swipe at all this God talk.Â
The message is simple: Suck it up, girls, and remember the hierarchy. Women obey men and men obey God.
Eleanor,Â
My critique of your piece is that you're not really trying to engage the Chastity/Pro-Life advocates in conversation and in an open exchange of ideas. Â It seems, rather, that you're trying to marginalize them. Â My reading of your post is, "These people aren't really worth talking to, they're simply tools of the establishment. Â We obviously can't shut them up, but we should try to make sure that no one listens to them or takes them seriously." Â The end result is that they don't feel listened to, you don't feel listened to, and nobody has a chance to learn anything useful that might enable them to modify or improve their understanding.
I think we can do better than that.Â
Paul Bradford
Pro-Life Catholics for Choice
You, Paul, don't seem to be listening either. As with many comments that you have made on this site and as many women have written in response to your comments, we don't feel like you listen. Each piece that is written on this site does not have to be an open exchange. Pieces such as the above are valuable as a "know this" type, an informational awareness article. And for that, I applaud Eleanor.Â
This is a standard tool in the authoritarian toolbox. If someone criticizes a pressure group with whom you are sympathetic, then protest that 'free speech' and 'religious freedom' and so on are all being disrespected because 'dialogue' isn't being solicited.
Unfortunately, 'dialogue' is not possible with fringe ideological groups, because as ideologues they aren't interested in respectful conversation but instead with stigmatization of anyone and everyone outside the group.
The Chastity and Wait Till Marriage groups are trying to resurrect fringe positions about sexuality that still persist in religious texts but have been abandoned by the great majority of our population. Their argument is that they SHOULD work rather than that they actually do work.
They are blatantly ignorant of the unworkability of their 'ideals' as demonstrated by their history in societies where attempts were made by governments or religions to enforce them, and unable to recognize the injustice of the enormous costs which were levied on women and children to punish deviations while men largely escaped the consequences.
They continue in this willful ignorance even while the news reports exactly those problems on-going at the present time in areas like the Middle East, where women are being killed for not being 'chaste' or 'modest' or 'pure' or for being forced to 'fornicate' during rapes. The ideal and the enforcement problems are inseparably linked together.
These groups hide the true mechanisms of what would happen if they reached their goals and demand society's permission to have access to other people's children to promote emotionalist propaganda that might succeed in convincing children that these ideals deserve resurrection. The irony of 'promoting family values' by convincing children that their parents were 'fornicators' and therefore deviant and undeserving of respect seems to just slide right by.
