Same-Sex Marriage: Will New Jersey Do the Right Thing?
by Joseph DiNorcia Jr, SIECUS
December 9, 2009 - 2:17pm (Print)
The quick passage of this legislation is also important in stemming the recent gay marriage setbacks in New York and Maine. While I do not believe that the recent events in these states accurately reflect the feeling of the majority of people, they demonstrate the lengths to which opponents have gone in blocking equal marriage rights. And, these same opponents are in full force in New Jersey. Over the past few weeks, groups like the National Organization for Marriage have funneled money into the Garden State and conducted a full frontal attack, including a robo-caller campaign, to get their message out. The Catholic Church has also been very engaged in the fight against marriage equality. Patrick Brannigan, representing the Catholic Bishops of New Jersey, has been active in getting the church’s message out to all of the parishes, instructing their parishioners to contact their State Senators and voice their objection to this legislation. What makes the actions of the Catholic Church and other faith-based organizations even more frustrating and perplexing is that there is an amendment added to the New Jersey legislation that specifically allows clergy to refuse to perform a gay marriage ceremony.
The marriage equality legislation just barely came out of the New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee by a vote of 7–6. But, beware; this was not a party line vote. Quite disturbingly the Judiciary Chair Paul Sarlo and Vice Chair John Girgenti, both Democrats, voted no and have publicly said that they will vote no when the legislation is brought up for a full vote. These two Democrats joined with four Republicans to make up the six nay votes. But one Republican, Bill Baroni, voted in favor of the legislation, and he should be commended for being strong enough to make the right vote and not succumb to party pressure.
While Loretta Weinberg, the sponsor of the legislation was successful in getting this out of the Judiciary Committee and to the floor for a full vote, the road ahead is precarious. Senate President Dick Codey has promised to bring the legislation to the floor for a full vote on Thursday and we must hold him to that. Still, it remains unclear what the vote looks like. As we know from past votes on same-sex marriage in other states, when it comes time for legislators to step up and do the right thing, political pressure all too often intervenes and few elected officials do so.
So, now is the time for residents of New Jersey to step up by calling their Senators and telling them to vote in favor of gay marriage, not only because their vote rests on it, but also because it is the right thing to do. Let’s all hope that New Jersey will join Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, Vermont and New Hampshire as the states that had the courage to do what is right and respect the rights of gay and lesbians to marry.
are the best reason for everyone to explore candidates in ALL political parties. And to consider the option of voting for nobody...
at least this is what one half my brain tells me
Mr. DiNorcia, I found your blog when doing a google search for "new jersey gay marriage", and I'm disappointed your article. As a New Jersey resident that is undecided on the position, the language that you use in your article is the worst type of reporting, and should be filed under editorial. You use such words as "right thing to do" and "courage", without backing it up with strong, accurate background research citing cases or precedent. You are given this platform, yet fail to make a convincing argument, while at the same time attacking the other side. And while we're on the word "attack", why is it that the National Organization for Marriage campaigns their agenda in New Jersey; you call it an "attack"? It's their way of getting the message out to their supporters, as well as people like me who are undecided.
Also, did you mean to use the word "disturbingly", when referring to Chair Sarlo? Maybe you should check the dictionary on the meaning of the word. Senator Sarlo is well respected, and represents his constituents well, I should know, he's my representative and has always been receptive to my concerns, even if he doesn't always see eye-to-eye. Bottom line, he's a good Senator, and I think you are out of line for your comments.
Finally, please make better use of your platform. And on this issue, I wish all of our New Jersey legislative representatives would move this quickly on the state economy, budget, job creation and corruption, as they have on this issue of legalizing same-sex marriage.
<br>
*edited to correct formatting errors, since html tags didn't work...no change to content*
