RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

Policies to Curb Latina Teen Pregnancies Have Failed

By Silvia Henriquez, National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health

September 17, 2009 - 7:00am

Silvia Henriquez's picture

This article originally appeared on Huffington Post.

Are the nation's efforts to curb Latina teen pregnancy actually making young Latinas more vulnerable?

Vanessa,* age 19, watched President Obama's recent education address to students while holding her infant son and sitting with her niece Liz,* age 13.  A few weeks earlier, Vanessa had become one of the growing number of Latina teen moms in the United States, surviving on her fiancé's minimum wage job at Target and temporarily postponing a college education. What are the country's leaders telling Vanessa about her socioeconomic future as a young mom? What are they telling Liz?

Vanessa's story is quite common: Latina teens give birth at a rate more than twice that of white teens. Latinos have a much lower high school and college graduate rate compared to white teens. The millions poured into programs aimed at curbing the Latina teen pregnancy rate and urging Latinos to pursue higher education have been largely ineffective. In fact, some of these campaigns may have inadvertently worsened the situation by misplacing blame and perpetuating bias. Instead of stigmatizing Vanessa, policy experts ought to be looking at the complex structural barriers that offer her starkly different choices than many of her teen counterparts.

Myths -- rather than realities -- have too often guided the public discourse about Latinas and pregnancy. Latina teens don't have sex more often than their white counterparts and most desire a college education. In addition, despite the demonization of immigrants in recent health care debates, most Latina teen moms are not immigrants. So what is underneath the startling pregnancy statistics?

Compared to white teens, Latina teens have higher pregnancy rates because they use birth control much less often and reject abortion much more often. Religion and family influence are very important factors, but for sexually active Latina teens these are not the only or even most relevant obstacles to birth control usage. For many Latinas, the top barriers to birth control usage are much more mundane: transportation, lack of health insurance or cash for health services, confusing and intimidating immigration regulation for households with a combination of citizens and non-citizens, and lack of guidance about available services. When teen pregnancy prevention programs and messages ignore these obstacles, Latinas become distanced from sex education efforts.

Sex education programs often tell teens that delaying parenthood until they finish high school and college will bring them some version of the American dream: a good job, economic security, family stability. The troubling reality is that for Latinas this promise comes true for only a limited few. Recent research confirms that Latina teen mothers have roughly the same socioeconomic circumstances at age 30 as those Latina teens who delay childbirth. The unfortunate reality is that access to college and the opportunities that emerge as a result is starkly different for Latina teens and white teens.

Latinas ought to be given the support they need to finish high school and attend college. But it's simply not enough to lecture Latina teens about prioritizing education; we must make real investments in tearing down barriers to educational opportunities and health care. We must find better ways to support young parents like Vanessa who wish to pursue college. Unfortunately too often the opposite happens. For example, legislation recently proposed to address teen pregnancy would have given a financial reward to college graduates who agreed to mentor youth living in poverty, but would not have provided additional resources to the young women. Shouldn't the youth living in poverty get the federal dollars to help them gain access to birth control and other resources that might give young women the power to plan their families the way they want them, rather than giving the money to college graduates?

Worsening this situation is the silly practice of one-size-fits-all messaging for all Latina teens. A thirteen-year-old sexually active teen poses very different concerns than a 19-year-old sexually active teen. In fact, about 44 percent of teen mothers are adults like Vanessa when they give birth -- 18 or 19 years old -- and they have needs that are different than those of young teens like Liz. Messages that treat teen pregnancy as an urgent health risk serve to stigmatize young adult mothers rather than empower teens to live healthy lives.

It may be politically expedient to treat high Latina teen pregnancy rates as the problem to be solved rather than the result of social inequities -- but it isn't likely to be effective. Many reproductive health advocates choose to focus narrowly on birth control messaging and avoid the related issues of immigration status, poverty, educational disparities and discrimination. But the result of this narrow vision has so far proved disastrous. Politicians need to get to the tough work of breaking down structural barriers to health care and education, and re-focus their efforts on giving young women the knowledge, access and power to plan their families in the ways that work best for them.

In a nutshell, if we can clamp down on the ways that Vanessa and Liz are stigmatized, and ramp up measures that expand access to education and health care, our entire society wins.

*Names have been changed to protect identities


. . . . .
4 comments
Please login or register to post comments...

So what course of action would you suggest... specifically?

Submitted by cmarie on September 17, 2009 - 7:13am.

It's simply not enough to lecture Latina teens about prioritizing education; we must make real investments in tearing down barriers to educational opportunities and health care. We must find better ways to support young parents like Vanessa who wish to pursue college.

 

I'm all for tearing down barriers but I'm at a loss to figure out what you think is involved in tearing those barriers down.  You have come out against a program designed to have college educated young people mentor the poor.  I know, from personal experience, that these programs work to help kids stay in school and to succeed. 

 

Do you agree with me that kids who have a strong personal relationship with somebody who has been academically successful have an improved chance for their own success?

 

I certainly want the Vanessas of the world to go to college, but I'm certain that more person-to-person support for kids and teens will mean that fewer Vanessas will get pregnant before they've completed their education. 

 

Paul Bradford

 

Pro-Life Catholics for Choice

Submitted by Paul Bradford, Pro Life Catholics for Choice on September 17, 2009 - 9:39am.

Church Dogma has it that you cannot have Family planning because the more babies you have the more souls there are to go to Heaven. Even though the babies are barely kept fed and clothed and, more often than not, there is little or no money for school, especially in countries were there is no public or state provided K-12 education. The Church's obsession with the hereafter, or after life, does not do justice to the quality of life as you pass through it. This obsession with the hereafter is a Dark Ages frame of reference or time window. Food and clothing are one thing, what about vertical mobility through Education? If a Father can barely feed himself, let alone a Wife and a bunch of kids, what are the children's chances of rising out of the "Cycle of Poverty." If powerful social influences and influencing people advocate social mores and policies that severely handicap the impoverished from breaking out of the cycle of poverty, the cycle is only further entrenched. I am not against being concerned about the "Quality" of life after death, if such a thing does exist. What about the horrible hopelessness and pain and suffering of those with no way out of their lifestyle except through a funeral pyre or a pine box or white linen, etcetera? What if they want a better life for themselves as well as their future generations, and all they get is something like "Forget about that nonsense and only pay attention to your hour of death!" A statement like that is, in and of itself, nonsense!  My understanding is that a Woman's chances of death from, or during, childbirth goes up 50% after the fifth child.  Correct me if I am wrong.  I cannot fathom that  members of our Government think that unwanted pregnancies; unwanted children; back alley abortions; do-it-yourself abortions [Google DIY Abortions and you will be inundated with instructions and where to purchase drugs, Vacuum equipment, Dillitation and Curretage utensils, etcetera!] are all a wonderful and glorius state of affairs!  You can deny it all you want, "but," abortion was here from the beginning of time, it is here now, it will be here as long as we are around, no matter what "your" Bible says or the Laws say!  Trying to stop it is wishful thinking at best, no matter what your furver or zeal produces.  I do not want blood on my hands from driving it back underground.

 

The lack of access to family planning is a major, if not the major, cause of world wide poverty!

Submitted by jbgruver on September 17, 2009 - 7:04pm.

It was quite interesting reading about several of the sensitive issues surrounding teen pregnancies you touch on and how this has impacted the Latina population in specific. An interesting point you discuss is the fact that one reason teens are encouraged to wait to get pregnant is so they have a better chance of achieving the American Dream, but that methodology might not work for most Latina teens because their reality can be drastically different than the average American teenager. You stated that, Latina teen mothers have about “the same socioeconomic circumstances at age 30 as those Latinas who delay childbirth.” So this shows that having such broad prevention methods might not reach out to all populations. It is important to look at specific populations to target for prevention efforts. Even within the Latina population there are differences. Implementing prevention programs that employ different prevention methods would be an excellent beginning to facilitate a better educated, more aware, teenage population. But a question I am considering is how will this fit into the new health care reform of President Barack Obama, or how should, if at all, the government’s involvement be determined to help fund or run these programs? Rather than letting this issue be kept as a low priority, it should be made aware to the entire population. And instead of scorning these teen mothers, we should have resources to aid them in this life altering stage of their lives as well as provide services for teen pregnancy prevention. Like you have argued, we should not stigmatize teen mothers, but instead “empower teens to live healthy lives.” If parents are more prepared to raise their children, which is less likely the case for teen parents, we can improve quality of life. So if we increase access and education, we will benefit our society to ensure a better and brighter future for our children.

 

Thank you,

Daniela Rodriguez 

Submitted by drodriguez15 on September 22, 2009 - 4:23am.