RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

International Guidelines For Sex-Ed Spokesmodel?

Amie Newman's picture

With the recent release of a new UNESCO report advocating for and presenting voluntary global guidelines for sex-ed, the time may be near where we consider who we use as ambassadors to carry the message forward. Would it be unfeminist to suggest a spokesmodel for the comprehensive sex-ed movement? What if she were a different kind of spokesmodel? A free-thinking, unencumbered-by-politics kind of a representative who, let's face it, can grab the attention of those conservative fellows who just cannot seem to let go of their overpowering obsession with controlling the ways in which we discuss, present and teach sex-ed in this country. 

Broadsheet’s Kate Harding blogged about the brilliant segment on Sean Hannity's "Great American Panel" Monday night in which Aubrey O’Day, Playboy cover model and former P. Diddy girl-group almost-star, lays down the cold, hard truth about sex-ed, for the boys.

O’Day’s demeanor is just perfect, as far as I’m concerned, when she counters these older men almost squirming in their seats over the audacity of the report’s guidelines for age-appropriate sexual health information. When Hannity turns the topic to the old spin “They want to teach masturbation to five year olds!” hysteria, all hell breaks loose:

Hannity: “It’s actually happening to the five year-olds!”

But O’Day reels them in so fluidly:

O’Day: “You boys never wondered about what you were doing and wished to be educated about it earlier?...”

The hard-core conservative, anti-choice crowd is up in arms over the report, International Guidelines on Sexual Education which, according to UNESCO,

“are voluntary and non-mandatory in character, provide educators with guidance on how children and young people can best acquire the knowledge they need to protect themselves from coercion, abuse and exploitation, unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.”

Minnesota Citizens Concerned For Life (MCCL) complains that the report suggests that children should be “instructed” on how to become abortion advocates and that 12- 15 year olds be informed about where and how to obtain a legal abortion. And the web site, FreeRepublic.com, is home to a host of comments on the report, many of which seem to believe that the mere discussion about sexual health and sexuality is “perverted.”  Screams one commenter in utter terror over human sexuality,

“No 5 year old has the “right” to play with themselves! You teach them to keep their hands out of their pants not in them.”

UNESCO, however, explains the impetus for creating the “evidence- and rights-based” guidelines, “Reducing HIV infection in young people and improving their sexual and reproductive health require effective education programmes. However, such programmes are still not available in many parts of the world. UNESCO and its partners have now developed new guidelines to address this problem.”

Aubrey O’Day, my new vote for sex-ed spokesmodel (grammatical errors be damned) said it best, “How is education robbing a child of their innocence?”


. . . . .
5 comments
Please login or register to post comments...

Good on Aubrey O'Day! Seems like Hannity brought her on for a gag ("Oh, look, a Playboy model!! Ha ha!!") and she totally became the voice of reason.

Submitted by johannahatch on September 2, 2009 - 2:26pm.

The surprising way in which she addressed this issue and spoke directly to these guys, on such a personal level, and yet with such clarity was just brilliant to watch. I loved it as well. Thanks!

Amie Newman

Managing Editor, RH Reality Check

Submitted by Amie Newman, Managing Editor on September 2, 2009 - 2:30pm.

I had to have that masturbation discussion about "privacy" with both of my kids as soon as they were potty trained and the disappearance of the diaper let them discover what felt good. I'd bet that any kid who claims he/she "knew nothing about sex" at five had a mother who gave a lot of hard smacks to the hands for "touching dirty places" between 18 months and two years. No wonder this guy is so weird!!

Submitted by crowepps on September 2, 2009 - 6:40pm.

is wrong with teaching children that masturbation and touching oneself is healthy and good? In fact, it is a parental responsibility, as far as I'm concerned to teach our children that touching oneself is positive and normal, and a private activity to be done by yourself. Masturbation is a terrifying conceptual idea to conservatives because it's purely about sexual pleasure - at least with sex they can claim that it's sort of a necessary evil in order to procreate (don't have fun, do it only when you're married, and only then to make babies!).

People are sexual beings from birth until death and therefore we have a responsibility to explain to our children, in an age-appropriate way, what their bodies may be experiencing at different stages of their growth. Infants sometimes masturbate (but don't tell Sean Hannity - he'll want to create some kind of iron diaper) - and five year-olds? Of course they're exploring their own bodies. Sexuality is a part of life! For what it's worth, crowepps, I had a similar experience with my children and they have always felt completely secure in asking me many questions about their bodies. Education and knowledge = confidence and health.

Thanks for the comment, crowepps!

Amie Newman

Managing Editor, RH Reality Check

Submitted by Amie Newman, Managing Editor on September 2, 2009 - 8:59pm.

I appreciate the shout-out, but Tracy Clark-Flory wrote the Broadsheet post in question. :)

Submitted by Kate Harding on September 24, 2009 - 10:40pm.