RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

Education and Pregnancy: Mutually Exclusive?

Serrin Foster's picture
When Chaunie Saelens went searching on her Michigan university campus, she learned there were virtually no resources for students like her facing an unplanned pregnancy. Sally Winn and her husband discovered the same thing in Indiana. Joyce McCauley-Benner learned she was pregnant after being sexually assaulted while working her way through college in Florida; trying to navigate the maze of resources made her difficult situation even worse. When Julia Thornton faced an unplanned pregnancy during college, she decided adoption was the best choice for her and her daughter, but the lack of support drove her to drop out.

Personal stories like those of Feminists for Life speakers are echoed across the country. Pregnant professors on the tenure track often fare no better.  In fact, little has changed since my father graduated with me in his arms.

When Feminists for Life’s Board of Directors was determining the best way for us to serve women and children, a board member shared her story. After a bad break up with her boyfriend, Jeannie discovered that she was pregnant. As a graduate student deep in debt, she looked around her Washington, D.C., campus for the basics and found nothing. She attributes her miscarriage to the stress of feeling she had no choice but to seek an abortion. “Without housing, child care and maternity coverage, it doesn’t feel like you have much of a choice,” she said.

As I traveled across the country giving lectures on pro-life feminist history, I realized that I had never seen a visibly pregnant student. FFL moved into action.

In January 1997, I moderated the first-ever FFL Pregnancy Resource Forum at Georgetown University, where administrators, staff and students together inventoried the resources for pregnant and parenting students on and off campus and determined priorities. Since then, Georgetown has dedicated housing for student mothers in nearby townhouses and built a childcare center adjacent to campus. Most important, the university designated a central place on campus to coordinate services including financial aid, counseling and health care. Today, Georgetown has monthly “safety net” meetings of various departments and an annual Forum to fine-tune their efforts to support pregnant students and parents.

Our initial Forum became a model for the country; since then, FFL has moderated similar panel discussions from Harvard to Berkeley, Notre Dame to Pepperdine. FFL lectures and Forums have also sparked creative solutions by students—both pro-life and pro-choice. Berkeley students collected money to install dozens of diaper decks on a campus that has housing for 1,000 families. University of Virginia students took CPR courses and offered free babysitting services. Pro-life and pro-choice students at Wellesley held a rummage sale to provide funds for a pro-choice student who lost her housing grant when she had her child. That student later started a campus group called Sisters’ Keepers to build support for women like her.

Student-organized change is effective but, in most cases, impermanent. Without the basics—including institutional changes that support women and men who choose marital/partnered/single parenting or various adoption options, a central place on campus to coordinate services, and communication of available services during orientation and on the university website—women will continue to feel they don’t have much of a choice.  

Research by the Guttmacher Institute has found that the primary reasons women have abortions are lack of resources and support. Feminists for Life works to systematically eliminate the reasons that drive women to abortion.

FFL, like Guttmacher, has been listening to women about their unmet needs. College-age women have almost half of the abortions in the U.S. In 2007, FFL asked student activists at campuses across the country to try to find basic services for pregnant and parenting students. The results were dismal but no surprise. As one student put it, “If you do get pregnant, your college experience here is over.”

As both sides look for ways to work together, FFL proposes an abortion-neutral bill, the Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Student Services Act. If passed, this legislation would provide funds to start a central place on campus to coordinate services for pregnant and parenting students, to identify available services and recommend next steps at an annual Pregnancy Resource Forum, and to give information to staff and students. The bill is named for the mother of the women’s movement, who was also the mother of seven children.

Being pregnant or parenting shouldn’t terminate an education, and the lack of resources and support shouldn’t make a woman feel coerced into terminating her pregnancy. But it happens regularly and goes unnoticed at campuses across the country.

Let’s replicate success by working together again to pass the Elizabeth Cady Stanton Act. Pregnant and parenting college students deserve better.


. . . . .
11 comments
Please login or register to post comments...

Serrin, thanks for shedding some light on a oft-avoided topic. Having graduated from college not too long ago, I think you're absolutely right to draw attention to a tremendously underserved population. Even in schools where this is no stigma on reproductive health, contraception can be costly and women's health offices often have long waits for the necessary appointment to get on the pill or get access to other behind-the-counter contraceptives. And then for those college-aged women who do get pregnant, very few option seem viable. I hope supporting pregnant and parenting students can be one point on common ground for those on both sides of the abortion issue!

Submitted by Kristin on June 16, 2009 - 12:15pm.

About HARM of the early beginning of a sexual life - the slightest hint! Approach of undesirable pregnancy is possible, that at teenagers almost always conducts to abortion, and behind it - to a chain of every possible illnesses;


In days of my childhood there were many serials in which problems of teenagers revealed...

Submitted by Julia Fergo on July 24, 2009 - 8:37pm.

Serrin, one would hope that folks with different views on the legality of abortion could agree on such things as providing support for pregnant college students.

But the distortions and prejudice shown on this site don't make me optimistic. Did you know that this site lists Feminists for Life as a "far right" organization? Do you consider that accurate?

On this very page there is a banner saying "Crisis Pregnancy Centers: Nothing but False Promises and Misinformation". Do you believe that?

As a listed contributor to the site, can't you insist that they stop their distortions and falsehoods about pro-lifers as a condition of your participation? Overall, this is an attack site, not a common ground site.

Submitted by Bill Samuel on June 16, 2009 - 1:34pm.
It is possible for people who differ to engage the discussion. Serrin knows very well who RH Reality Check is and that we aren't going to change any more than we expect her to. You might learn something by reading the article about CPC's. And our site will continue to write from a progressive perspective -- but in this space -- Serrin knows we're trying something different. All we're asking is that people open their minds to the possibility things might change as a result. Thanks Serrin for your contribution and "agreeing to disagree."


Be the change you seek,

Scott Swenson, Co-Publisher

Submitted by Scott Swenson, RH Reality Check on June 16, 2009 - 1:44pm.

Complaining about distortion is fine, but the reality is that this pro-choice site is providing free space to pro-life bloggers and posts. I think RH can be forgiven for using the site to express its own views.



Now, I would be interested to learn if any pro-life site is willing to generously offer the same to opposing views?



I know from experience that, even if one is pro-life but dissents on an issue--such as fetal personhood laws--one finds her comments moderated and deleted.



If humble comments are not tolerated at pro-life sites, I suspect that it would be a bit ambitious to ask for a free blog.


The pro-lifers here have it good, Bill. The pro-life community can learn from RH and other pro-choice sites about permitting disagreement.


Submitted by AlsoAnonymous on July 13, 2009 - 7:12am.

Indeed college campuses are very problematic. While I am certainly for a woman's right to choose, I really hate the fact that those choices available are often untenable and end up with the woman feeling that she has no options or that the options available are untenable. These include being forced to choose between education or parenthood, financial pressures, and of course for many the biggie is public negativity and censure. There is also little university or college support for parenting -- no resources or rights for students who are breastfeeding, no sick leave policies for students that are struggling with pregnancy or birth complications, and everything left to the whims of individual professors and administrators.

This situation should be unacceptable. I'll only believe that folks are really searching for common ground though, when ALL are willing to say, ok lets leave the law where it is, and TRY to improve policies. Lets SEE if better financial support, more emotional support and better access to services makes a difference.

I honestly believe that it truly will make a difference. Too bad those entrenched on both sides of the issue have such a hard time with inclusion.

Submitted by Anonymous on June 16, 2009 - 5:10pm.

This environment there was a concept of a community, motherhood and fatherland as the objects of service directed on well-being and quality of a life of a community. As soon as we will find a spiritual way of the decision of material problems, having executed our role of representatives of spiritual culture in a material world, we can feel at once more full dynamics of a spiritual life and we will learn to create spirituality atmosphere where we were.

Submitted by Kyoto Masima on July 23, 2009 - 8:29pm.

The Feminists for Life page about the Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant & Parenting Student Services Act is right-- How often do you see Planned Parenthood staffers, Feminist Majority and Focus on the Family agreed on legislation? This is a great bill.

Submitted by Anonymous2 on June 17, 2009 - 1:58pm.

This is a great idea, And, it does address a very significant issue. Abortion with no support systems in place that would allow someone to make a different decision is no choice. This is something that pro choice and pro life people can agree upon.

quot;Well behaved women seldom make history."-Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

Submitted by Progo35 on June 23, 2009 - 8:25am.

I really feel strongly that information is the key to making any good decision when it comes to reproduction and pregnancy, especially when the life of a baby is on the line. When backed in to a corner (ie... with no information) young couples make terrible decisions simply because they dont know what all of their options are, and that quite frankly is sad.

Submitted by JeffW on July 19, 2009 - 9:36am.

We live in the richest country in the world, yet students are left to organizing rummage sales for young pregnant women. As hopeful as that is, I call this a public health disaster! Does anyone know how this situation is handled in Canada or in Europe where they have universal coverage? Please tell me it's better...

Submitted by Anonymous on July 19, 2009 - 2:25pm.