RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

Surge in Need Taxes Abortion Funds

Leila Darabi and Constance DeCherney's picture

The New York Abortion Access Fund, an all-volunteer organization that provides funds for women who can't afford the abortions they need, is going broke, literally. In recent months, we have received a record number of calls from low-income women and health clinics representing them asking for our help to pay for their abortions and our eight-woman board is struggling to raise funds fast enough to keep up with the demand. Last week, NYAAF's assets dipped below $3000. If current trends continue, as we suspect they will, that may not last through the end of the month.

Since its inception in 2001, NYAAF has given out over $100,000, nearly half of it in the last year alone. We suspect two factors have led to the dramatic increase in requests for our funding. First, our visibility has increased. Though NYAAF began as New York City's abortion fund, it is also one of few resources in the state for low-income women who need but cannot afford an abortion. Over the past year, NYAAF has reached out to health care providers beyond the five boroughs, asking abortion clinics throughout the state of New York not to turn away patients who lack the funds for their procedures, but to call us instead. The result has led to greater access to abortion services for low-income women outside of New York City. It also means we are giving out more money than ever before.

The second, and considerably more dramatic, factor driving women to call NYAAF is the global economic downturn. The Associated Press reported recently that financial troubles make it more difficult for women to purchase birth control to avoid unintended pregnancies and to obtain timely abortions if they do become pregnant. Not having enough money means women facing unintended pregnancies wait longer to have abortions as they scrounge to raise funds. And waiting longer means more complicated, more expensive procedures and an even greater need for funds like NYAAF

Indeed, the women and clinic staff we speak to each week cite fundraising as a major barrier to booking appointments for earlier and less expensive procedures. Consequently, the number of women calling us in their 22nd, 23rd and even 24th week of pregnancy has increased. While helping women obtain later term procedures is not new for NYAAF-New York has long served as a safe haven for women seeking abortions from other states with more restrictive abortion policies-these procedures are expensive and, along with an overall increase in requests for NYAAF assistance, have rapidly drained our funds.  

For those of us fielding calls from women and clinics, this frustrating situation is heartbreaking. The longer it takes a woman to secure funding, the more expensive the procedure becomes and the fewer women we are able to help. The cost of a procedure increases dramatically with each passing week, ranging from a couple hundred dollars for an early, medical abortion to several thousand dollars to terminate a pregnancy nearing the legal limit. After twenty weeks, the cost of an abortion rises even more quickly: the difference between a procedure done at 22 weeks versus 23 can be a thousand dollars.  

At NYAAF, our philosophy is simple. We aim to pledge money to clinics as quickly as possible to ensure that women are able to keep their earliest appointments and receive the safest and most affordable care available. We maximize our funds by working directly with clinics, negotiating discounts and payment plans for low-income women and matching eligible women to public assistance. In the last year, we helped 77 women pay for their abortions. Others we were able to help apply for emergency Medicaid, assistance available in New York but not all of our neighboring states. 

The economic downturn threatens to wipe out our fund and pressures women all over the country to seek later abortions. Communities need to invest in local grassroots abortion funds like NYAAF and Americans nationwide need to pressure the Obama administration to repeal the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funding for abortion. Those of us on the frontlines of abortion funding can report: early funding makes all the difference.


. . . . .
9 comments
Please login or register to post comments...

Planned parenthood states that viability occurs at 24 weeks. Shouldn't this mean that 24 weeks is too late to have an abortion at all, barring some severe medical emergency?

quot;Well behaved women seldom make history."-Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

Submitted by Progo35 on April 15, 2009 - 1:13am.

24 weeks is the legal limit, and also the procedure becomes even more expensive and dangerous after that point.

Do notice the part where women want to have the procedure done earlier in their term, but can't, because they haven't collected enough funds to pay for it. Nobody's running up to the limit just because they can.

Submitted by Anonymous on April 15, 2009 - 2:07am.

"Nobody's running up to the limit just because they can." Yes, I realize that. But if someone is that far along, like I've said before, abortion is taking the life of a developed fetus, not a clump of cells, and this seems to fly in the face of the claim that late term abortions are rare and done for catastrophic health reasons.

"Well behaved women seldom make history."-Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

Submitted by Progo35 on April 15, 2009 - 2:35am.

and this seems to fly in the face of the claim that late term abortions are rare and done for catastrophic health reasons.

Late-term abortions are as such when early-term abortions are not put out of reach by financial and other barriers. Are you going to tell me, with a straight face, that women postponing abortion due to anti-choice legislation and funding restrictions is an argument against the pro-choice side?

Submitted by Anonymous on April 15, 2009 - 2:52am.

--wait a second, how exactly does this fly in the face of the claim that late-term abortions are rare? Late-term abortions *are* rare. According to the most recent CDC report (from 2005), only 1.3 percent of all abortions performed in the U.S. are performed at over 21 weeks. And if I'm reading this Guttmacher publication correctly, an estimated .0008 percent of all abortions are performed at over 24 weeks.

Submitted by Airina on April 15, 2009 - 8:21am.

Thank God your abortion funds are drying up and babies' lives will be spared.

"Choose life so that you and your children may live." Deut. 30:19

Submitted by For Life on April 15, 2009 - 11:15am.

...but because New York allows later-term abortions than its neighboring states, we see a disproportionate number of cases here. And because later cases are more expensive and women who have been forced to delay their abortion are often poorer women with the least access to medical care, these are some of the women most likely to look to the New York Abortion Access Fund for support.

Based on the experiences of the women and clinic staff we talk to, it seems clear to us that increased funding for safe and early abortion services would reduce the number of later-term abortion cases in the United States. As the commenter above noted, few women want to delay having an abortion. Those who do face delays are often up against a number of odds, including a lack of funds.

Leila Darabi

Two things to note: First, the best way to reduce abortion is to reduce unintended pregnancy in the first place. Increased funding for abortion services should go hand and hand with increased public funding for the full range of prevention services including contraception and realistic sex education in schools.

Second, it should be noted that NYAAF is the local chapter of the National Network of Abortion Funds (NNAF). For more information about how the national network helps women all over the country, the Web site is http://www.nnaf.org/

Submitted by Leila on April 15, 2009 - 11:25am.

But Leila-if abortion providers care so much about women, making abortion available, and reducing later abortions,why don't they provide free early abortions to those women so that later ones don't occur? Seriously, this would be the work of a true nonprofit, charity organization, would it not?

"Well behaved women seldom make history."-Laurel Thatcher Ulrich

Submitted by Progo35 on April 15, 2009 - 11:08pm.

But Leila-if abortion providers care so much about women, making abortion available, and reducing later abortions,why don't they provide free early abortions to those women so that later ones don't occur?

Because "caring so much about women" doesn't pay the rent. Now, if we were to repeal the Hyde Amendment, and federal funding entered the picture, then we would have a different story....

Seriously, this would be the work of a true nonprofit, charity organization, would it not?

That would be the work of an organization that can't stay open past the end of the month. As great as free abortions would be, PP's current funding structure doesn't allow it.

Submitted by Anonymous on April 16, 2009 - 12:25am.