Get Real! How Can I Give My Sister Sex Ed?

Author image
RespectIsSexy asks:

I am 17, and I have a 15 year old sister who is Autistic. I also come from an EXTREMELY Catholic family. I never got a sex talk - I straight-up asked my dad what sex meant when I was 9 or 10, and he gave me some very unhelpful answer about a gift that God intended to be shared between a man and a woman in marriage. I, however, had enough resources like gurl.com and, you know, friends with older sisters to eventually get the full picture. My sister does not.

Katie knows about menstruation and deals very well with it, but at last check she barely knew what her parts were and she does not appear to be receiving any meaningful sex education in school. But Katie is physically mature, and I'd bet almost anything that she's experiencing age-appropriate sexual feelings.

We share a room, and often if I walk in unannounced I'll find her seemingly lying on the bed doing absolutely nothing, looking irritatedly at me - the exact position I can be found in if interrupted masturbating. In light of this, I really think it's necessary that she receive some kind of sex education right about now. The only time the subject ever came up between her and my father, all he said was that that thing was called her vagina and she shouldn't let anyone touch it until she was married. Yeah, THAT'S helpful.

So it's going to be MY job to give my sister some kind of age-appropriate sex education before I go off to college, or she's never going to get it. Where the hell do I START? What should I DO? It's difficult to determine what age-appropriate sexual education is for someone whose mental age lags years behind her physical age, but I think that it's about time to start her off with the basics that most people learn around ages nine and ten - at the very least I think she ought to know her plumbing, and preferably the boys' too. And I think she needs to learn the tab-A-into-slot-B mechanics within the next few years, if not right now. It would be nice if you could recommend a book or something like that made for elementary-school students that talks about sexuality and the reproductive systems in a scientific-but-not-too-technical, kid-friendly way. Is there any such book ANYWHERE that will talk about sexual arousal and that sort of thing without actually talking about sex?

Book or no book, I think I'll probably have to have an actual Sex Talk with her, or a series of them, and I'm at a loss for how to handle that. How on Earth do I introduce it? What if she doesn't understand? What if she reacts poorly? What if she brings up her new learning at the dinner table? Special needs children can not keep secrets. It's absurd enough that I have to sex educate my sister behind my parents' back without my getting bawled out for it. What if she brings it up at SCHOOL? In your opinion as a sex educator, what would be the best way to broach the subject and conduct the conversation, and what information do you think should be covered? Do you have any experience or know anyone with experience in sex education for teenagers with special needs? You'd think loads of people must have faced this issue before me...

Heather answers:

Before I say anything else, I want to say how fantastic it is that you're looking to help a sibling with sex information and education, and to be an advocate for your sister in this. Young people, period, so often get gypped out of good, complete sex information -- as you know too well -- but those with special needs usually get cheated even more. You're my shero today!

I was at a fantastic disability panel at a conference last week (here's the whole text of that panel for you, and a bunch of great resources are linked there), and one thing those on the panel reminded us about was that rates of sexual abuse are around double for those with disabilities. Rates of sexual abuse for the disabled are 1.5 - 2 times higher than for those without disabilities, which is massive. In 2002, The Alberta Committee of Citizens with Disabilities stated that 83% of women with disability will become sexual abuse victims with disability in their lifetime. So, while information on sex, reproduction, health, healthy relationships and pleasure are important for everyone, as is information on abuse, education that helps protect your sister from sexual abuse is even more important than usual.

The bare basics of a good sex education, according to me, are going to address the body and self as a whole, including sexual anatomy and reproduction, care of our sexual health, sexual identity (bear in mind that we don't know what your sister's orientation is, so even the Tab A/Slot B stuff may not be the tabs and slots you're thinking of, so I'd be sure not to presume she'll be sexual with men or only men), sexual feelings in general, whether they be self-directed or about others, personal limits and boundaries, healthy and unhealthy sexual and relationship dynamics, and ways to communicate openly and well (verbally, through touch and body language, or any of her unique or preferred modes of communication). I always like a very strong emphasis on autonomy and our right to privacy (as well as what is and isn't generally considered socially appropriate per public sex), and I'd say that's all the more important for someone with a disability: they tend to get even more messages than most that their bodies are not truly or completely their own and that they are not entitled to privacy. Additionally, I'd suggest talking about feelings of social isolation and discomfort she may have because of her autism, as that will very likely be a sexuality issue for her. I'd also do all you can to empower her with the understanding that it is no less normal or appropriate for her to be and feel sexual than it is anyone else: that message alone, even if you gave her nothing else, is so powerful.

The actual mechanics of sex -- as in, this goes here with that, wiggle your hips like this, use your tongue like that -- are actually something I think fewer people need, period, particularly when we're talking about learning those abstractly, rather than with partners which is how any of us usually learns the how-to. If she can get an understanding of anatomy and accurate sexual anatomy, of limits and boundaries, and have some sense of what desire, pleasure and intimacy are, the rest follows pretty easily if and when she gets to having sexual partners. It's tough to try and tell someone about mechanics in any depth because it's all so individual to each of us per what we and partners like and dislike, do and don't want to do: the trick is to learn how to listen and communicate around sex so that when we are at sexual partnership, we learn and teach each other well in those partnerships per what we like and don't. Plus, your experience of sex as someone without autism may be different than hers: for instance, you're probably not as sensitive to touch as she is, so your ideas about mechanics may not jibe with her experiences in her own body.

Know that people with disability usually go through similar stages of development as their peers without disability: often people with disabilities are seen or treated as either totally asexual or as hyper-sexualized, but the truth is that overall, disabled people tend to develop like the rest of us and have the same diversity of sexuality as the rest of us. Developmentally disabled people just may think differently about it in terms of the way they think about anything differently, and may be different in some of the intellectual or social aspects of that development, so will often need to be taught about sex in a way that works for them uniquely. And again, how someone with a given disability literally feels with sex, what their experiences are like, can sometimes be different than the experiences of those without disability.

If you're looking to build a curriculum for your sister, I have a bunch of book suggestions -- not just one! -- which I'll order for you in terms of ages and stages. Most of them are colorfully illustrated, which should be a big help. I'd say most of them also leave a lot of room for difference of experience and identity, though some do better than others.

  • It's Perfectly Normal: Changing Bodies, Growing Up, Sex, and Sexual Health by Robie H. Harris
  • Kids First Book About Sex by Joani Blank (This is out of print, but it is the only children's book on sex I know of which I think really addresses pleasure in a meaningful, age-appropriate way. I actually have a copy and permission to publish it through Scarleteen, but have not yet gotten to do that yet. I'm sorry I don't have it up for you online, but I will have it here for everyone soon. You can probably find a used copy in the meantime, though.)
  • Your Body Belongs to You by Cornelia Maude Spelman (I list this because, again, a clear address of boundaries per abuse protections will be important)
  • What's Happening to Me?: A Guide to Puberty by Peter Mayle
  • Where Did I Come From? by Peter Mayle (I confess, this was my first sex ed book as a child, and I have a very soft spot for it)
  • Growing Up: It's a Girl Thing by Mavis Jukes
  • Taking Care of Myself: A Hygiene, Puberty and Personal Curriculum for Young People with Autism by Mary Wrobel
  • Deal with It! A Whole New Approach to Your Body, Brain, and Life as a gURL by Esther Drill, Heather McDonald and Rebecca Odes (Maybe you can pass on some of the great things gURL.com gave to you to your sister this way
  • S.E.X.: The All-You-Need-To-Know Progressive Sexuality Guide to Get You Through High School and College (This is the sexuality guide for teens and young adults I penned)

I put a pretty big range of materials in there for you. My suggestion would be that you look at some of the books a bit down the page I have suggested for you to read for yourself, and also to trust your own understanding of your sister -- which is clearly exceptional -- and just pick and choose what you want to use. That will probably mean using parts of any number of those books, rather than whole books. You may want to use this page from here, this chapter from there, and also do some adapting of your own in terms of how you translate some of the material for your sister.

You might also want to look at some of the sex education materials online here at Scarleteen (or at gURL, since you found what you needed for yourself there), and adapt them to best suit your sister.

You can take a look at those books or materials online and, trusting your judgment, figure out what is best to start with. I'd suggest starting with the simplest, and also the most basic: the books for the youngest readers which focus mostly on anatomy, boundaries and basic sexual development. You might even just start with the first few of them and put them on a table between you and see which she is drawn to on her own. As the kind of educator I am (I've been teaching in various settings for close to twenty years now, and actually started my teaching career with developmentally disabled teens and adults), my feeling is that what we want to do is get a sense of what a given student's unique needs are, starting from the simplest place we can. If in doing that, they show us a level of boredom or mastery of the subject when we do that, we keep moving it up until we get to where they are. It's also a good idea to simply be as attentive as you can to her questions and statements, and be responsive to those: often, if we just actively listen to someone we are teaching well, they'll tell us their needs and wants quite directly.

As far as introducing the subject, it seems to me like in some way, you have an easy in because of your experience with your parents. You could absolutely tell her that when you were growing up, you felt like there were some things you needed to know about your body and yourself that you did not know. You could suggest to her that she might feel the same way, ask if she does, and ask if she'd like you to give her some of that information. Given how close you two are in age, and given she's spent her whole life with you and you obviously have a lot of love for her, it sounds to me like she's going to feel safe and trust you very easily. You might even just tell her that this is something older sisters tend to do for younger sisters, given that it really is. In the case she doesn't understand what you're talking about with her, ask her questions to clarify what she needs and how she needs this presented, and just be sure you're not giving her too much information at once. By all means, getting all of this information to her will require far more than one talk: heck, anyone needs more than just one talk about sex and sexuality, despite the common idea that parents have "The" Sex Talk, rather than a series of them.

You will likely need to tailor or simplify your language sometimes, or find ways of presenting things that is more than just verbal: such as by providing visual representations, or through activities that involve touch or other kinds of interactivity. You probably already have those skills down given how long you have interacted with her for: you're just applying them to something new.

For example, if we're talking about personal boundaries of her body, you can ask her to touch, on her own body, places that are hers alone or to draw them. You can practice some sexual refusals with her, and have her say her own refusal scripts out loud with you. If you're talking about sexual orientation, drawing stick figures of different sets of partners per gender may be needed: often, autistic people do very well with visual learning. I'd suggest you do anything you're having her do: make activities shared, rather than just about her. The Autism Research Institute has a good, basic page on learning styles you might find helpful here. I'd just add that you'll want to bear in mind with anything you might teach her through touch that with any kind of touching of her, you're giving her information about boundaries. So, do be sure anything where you are touching her is in alignment with what you're telling her about her right to boundaries and ownership of her own body. You'll also want to bear her own hypersensitivities or hyposensitivities in mind when teaching her, sticking to things she reacts well to to use them TO teach, and avoiding anything she tends to react poorly to or become upset by.

I hear your concerns about her reacting badly, but as a sex educator, I can assure you that you probably don't need to have those concerns, for a few reasons. For starters, any of the material I suggested is sensitive, it's not salacious, and it is all meant for young people. As well, when we're teaching anything, one of the first things we tend to learn is that when someone isn't interested in or ready for given content, they tend just to be disinterested, or not to retain that knowledge, rather than to freak out about it. In the case she is upset by anything you say or seems scared, you can ask her about those feelings and talk them out with her, and you can also remind her that you are there for her as a support. However, if you want to know more about teaching her in general, you might see if you can't chat with one of her teachers about general issues of teaching her and what has worked best for her with other subjects. Too? Just having a teacher who clearly cares for us and respects us, and demonstrates that clearly, is usually all any of us will need, regardless of our abilities, to feel safe, even with touchy or tough subjects. She's already got that with you.

I have some books for you to read yourself:

  • Autism - Asperger's and Sexuality: Puberty and Beyond by Jerry Newport and Mary Newport (Both of whom are autistic themselves)
  • Sex, Sexuality And The Autism Spectrum by Wendy Lawson
  • Ten Talks Parents Must Have with Their Children About Sex and Character by Pepper Schwartz and Dominic Cappello
  • Sibling Stories: Reflections on Life with a Brother or Sister on the Autism Spectrum by Lynne Stern Feiges and Mary Jane Weiss (Mostly, this is to support you, and also because I think you'll really enjoy it)

Here are a couple good links online on sexuality and autism:

  • Sex Education for Children and Teens with Autism
    • Sexuality and Autism
    • While I'm talking about things for you, I want to make sure you're not shouldering more than you can handle.

      I think your sister is very lucky to have you, and that it's great you want to help her with her sexuality education. But at the same time, I also want to be sure you're not essentially parenting her yourself, because you don't have the kinds of resources your parents probably have, including the support of others in parenting someone. This is also a big project. I think it's a manageable one, but it'd be really ideal if you had some help and some extra support with it.

      One way I'd make sure you're caring for yourself in all of this is by doing what you can to assure that you don't basically wind up demonized for giving her this information, and that you also have some help with this. Does your sister have at least one good healthcare provider, teacher or caretaker you feel like will be supportive of this, and might also help you out with some of this education? If so, that'd be really ideal, both to help share the load, to have as good an idea as you can of what your sister's needs are, but also to have someone who might be able to talk to your parents about the need for this information. A good professional with this will probably also point out to your parents that many teens -- with or without disabilities -- don't get all or even most of their sexuality information from parents, and many do feel most comfortable talking with someone like a friend, a doctor, a teacher or an older sibling. I think it's going to be much better for both of you if your parents know what is going on than if you're trying to hide this in any way.

      You might also want to share some of the information and books on sexuality and autism with your parents. I recognize this is all doubly challenging since your parents have not seen a need for either you or your sister to get any sexuality information, and because of their religious beliefs, but again, I want to be sure you are as well supported as possible, as is your sister. You're right: expecting her to keep secrets is not at all reasonable, and I'd want to be as sure as we could that neither of you felt like you had to, for the well-being of you both. What I brought up earlier about her risks of sexual abuse might be an easier-in with them: if you make this about protecting her (which it is, mind, that's just not all it is about), and can make clear how that is even more important for her than it is for those without disabilities, it might be an easier sell. It may be that you and your parents can reach an agreement about at least getting her some of the most basic information. Their discomfort with sexuality and them being very conservative about it is going to be an issue, for sure, but it seems possible to at least get on the same page about her safety, about her understanding her body and human reproduction, about her developing healthy limits and boundaries and ways she can express those. And I'd say that kind of information is what's really critical, anyway, and that you can likely sneak in some pieces about pleasure and identity in that stuff under the radar.

      I'll be honest and say that I'm not sure how you can really do completely on the down-low, particularly when it comes both to protecting yourself AND not having things your sister says result in your parents freaking out with her, which could obviously impact her negatively. But if that is what you wind up having to do, I'd see if you can't find someone you know will be supportive of your efforts who your parents respect to call on if you wind up caught in the act, as it were, and need some support.

      In terms of your concerns that she would share this information at school, I'd not worry about that. Yes, she might, but these are not issues any teacher should be surprised to hear someone her age bring up. It also should not surprise anyone teaching the developmentally disabled to have them brought up very candidly or out-of-context. In other words, my advice would be for you not to worry about her teachers doing their job: you have enough on your plate as it is, and you are not breaking any laws or doing anything wrong by giving her this information. In other words, you're not at risk of getting into trouble from the school if she discloses any of the information you have given her.

      I know that was a lot of information, even though I feel like I barely scratched the surface. But hopefully, it will get you started, and those books I suggested for you will absolutely take things from here.

      Lastly? If you need some more help with this, and have a tough time finding others to help, or even just need some support as a caretaker, please feel free to come back here or to our message boards and ask for more help, other books, or extra information. I'd be happy to give you any more help that you need and that I can provide.

Follow Heather Corinna on Twitter, @Scarleteen

. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
21 comments
Please login or register to post and rate comments...
Comments are rated by readers on a scale from 1 to 5. Comments with a rating of 2 or less are hidden. Click on hidden comments to view them.
0
MadamaAmbi older sister teaching sex-ed April 11, 2009 - 12:05am

hi Heather--your reply to RespectIsSexy about educating her 15 yr. old autistic sister is generous, intelligent and makes sense...and it's overwhelming. I'm not a sex educator, but my background is feminist therapy and I spend time thinking about what's missing in so-called "sex-education" in the U.S.

Although you touch on the idea of owning one's sexuality by discussing boundaries, I think the idea of boundaries is hard to get if you don't know that feeling sexual and being sexual with others are two very different things.

One of the stages that is entirely skipped over in sex-education is the one that occurs when one is completely unaware that the feelings are normal, natural, pleasurable, and form a part of one's cohesion as a self. The 15 year old girl is discovering her self, and that's what she needs to have reflected back to her.

I think this is a fundamental issue of healthy sexuality and I never hear it discussed. We skip over the masturbation phase as if it's training for "real sex" with other people. In my experience, feeling sexual belongs in the repertoire of feelings and needs to be integrated into a sense of self as an important expression of being human. Like all feelings, being turned on can be felt alone or with an intimate, can be shared or kept to oneself.

If we allow a young person to feel empowered by self-discovery, which might be masturbation or might be a kind of proto-masturbation, then we would be laying the foundation for her to truly own her body and conceive of sexual expression as powerful language that she can share or experience alone.

One last point: I wonder if any 17 year old can adequately teach her younger sister what I've just discussed. I'm thinking that in order for a young person to really get that sex is not a series of emissions, techniques and prohibitions, she needs a teacher who can reflect back to her what is probably right now both inchoate and insistent. RespectIsSexy might need this herself.

0
Heather Corinna Hey there, Madama.  I April 11, 2009 - 12:56pm

Hey there, Madama.  I agree with you in talking about self-directed sexual feelings and activities vs. other-directed feelings and activities. When I talk above about self-directed feelings, that is what I'm reffering to, as well as masturbation.  I wasn't meaning to use a euphemism, but to speak about it more boradly than just as what one might do to onself.  As well, nearly all the books I suggested give ample time to discussion of masturbation and sexuality per the self, not just per others, and in the way I do sex education, I talk about masturbation a LOT.  I agree, it's missing in most sex ed in the states.

 

I do think older siblings can be great sex educators, and we've had many users at Scarleteen report over the years that some of their best sex education came from caring older siblings.  The sibs don't have to have a lifetime of sexual experience to be good educators, and as well, many older adults haven't had such broad experiences themselves anyway, nor necessarily have a better idea about sexuality as holistic than younger people do, so I don't think it's safe to assume that age alone makes sex ed better, you know?

0
cmarie The first thing I think the April 11, 2009 - 9:39am

The first thing I think the writer should do is take the letter she sent to Heather and give it to her mother because this is a very valid concern that the mother has to deal with. If I had a younger child and an older one I wouldn't feel obligated to update the older child on how/when I was dealing with the younger child's sexuality education; so I don't understand why everyone is assuming that the mother is just totally clueless and doing nothing. I would also suggest the writer and/or her mother contact www.autismspeaks.com They would certainly have some good, specific advice. I do agree though, what a wonderful sister!

0
Heather Corinna I hear that, cmarie, save April 11, 2009 - 12:58pm

I hear that, cmarie, save that given the older siblings experience with her parents and sex as she describes it, I do think it's probably safe for her to assume that her younger sister -- especially given her disability -- has been getting better sex information from her parents than she did.  More times than not, those who are disabled get LESS information, not more (in part because it's so typically assumed the disabled are asexual or won't need the information like abled people do), so I'd be inclined to agree with the OP when she presumes her sister isn't getting any more information than she did.

0
Anonymous not necessarily. April 27, 2009 - 4:22pm

cmarie:
also, the parents may be ignorant of a lot of aspects to sex. for instance, my mother had never heard of a flavored condom. people from an older generation (boomers and older) didn't get sex ed in schools, and people didn't talk about it much back then. so there may be a lot of questions that the sister may be able to answer better than the mother, simply because she was educated on the subject. and based on the fact that the older sister didn't get a whole lot of info, probably the younger sister didn't either. the family doesn't seem to be open about sexuality, so why would we assume that they adequately educated the child who may be thought of as less needful of the information. often parents of children with disabilities over-protect them or try to shelter them from life's hard truths.

0
Harry834 cmarie, April 11, 2009 - 4:12pm

While the mother MIGHT be more supportive than the father, it remains yet to be seen given the daughter's description. Maybe we should ask for more details, but I think it's pretty thorough. It sounds that if the mother was a supportive contrast to the father, the daughter would have mentioned that. She mentioned every other detail.
It might be the case that giving the letter to the mother might "wise her up". Then again, she could just react, freak out, talk to daddy, and new restrictions will be placed on who the daughters can communicate with bt mail and internet. They may have to have MORE of the father's (and now pastor's) shaming lectures.
It might be worth asking about the mother, but I feel we're just fishing. I'm not sure why cmarie thinks the mother might be sympathetic, not reactive, upon reading that letter if she did. Where in the daughter's testimony do we see reason to think this is plausible?

0
Harry834 on the flip side, April 11, 2009 - 6:16pm

hiding from these parents isn't a sustainable strategy. It's indeed a tough situation, and we can only hope that some reason will light through their heads. Heather's advice in talking about safety, but concealing the talks of pleasure, is perhaps as good as advice can get in a situation like this.

I wish for much strength for the daughter in finding the support she needs from adults who will understand. Kudos to advisers like Heather for being there with words, ears, and knowledge. 

0
cmarie yea after all who does she April 11, 2009 - 6:50pm

yea after all who does she think she is, only the mother. Only the parent who has raised BOTH these girls for fifteen years and like you say she might freak out- just like you might freak out if one of your kids decided to contribute to and moniter the sex ed of another. It's not as if the parents might know more about their younger daughter than her seventeen year old sister. Lets say your first child comes back from a semester at college and says "Dad I've found Jesus! I'm also becoming a pro life Republican". If he's an adult there not much you can do but I'm fairly sure you'd call interference if he began preaching to your younger kids. I know its hard to see the prespective of people with whom you have fundamental differences but try. We have no reason to think this woman is an idiot. Give her a chance to parent her own kid.

0
Heather Corinna I want to inject into this April 11, 2009 - 8:31pm

I want to inject into this that often, even in the best of situations,  in families who actively initiate quality sexuality education with their children, that parents certainly are rarely the only sexuality educators of children, but also very often are not the primary educators in many respects, however ideal that may not seem to some.

 

Young people frequently report that they prefer sex education from other sources than parents; from people with whom they are in different realtionships than parent/child: be that aunts and uncles, siblings, teachers, mentors, pastors, healthcare providers, counselors, what have you.  Ideally, they often tend to report that sex information from parents AND others is what they want most.

 

I say that because while I do think that sex education should be considered part of parenting, I think we have to be careful suggesting that anyone who provides sex education to a child or young person is parenting them or trying to usurp a parent: that just isn't true.  Sex education in and of itself is NOT parenting, no more or less than education on any other matter is.

 

Too, I think it's worth recognizing how many things older siblings often run interference on with younger siblings in families.  A sibling relationship is hardly minor, and can have a whole lot to offer, including filling in gaps for parents, or something like sex information where a sibling simply may be more comfortable and open with a sib (or even more accurate/current, given generational gaps) than they would with a parent.  I also have encourntered plenty of parents who don't find this at all threatening (as you seem to), and would even encourage older siblings to help with sex/body/relationship talks with younger ones.

 

I don't think myself, the OP or anyone here is judging the parents involved in this situation, nor suggesting the parents here are idiots, so I'm not sure I understand the defensiveness you seem to be expressing around it, cmarie. As well, any parent in this has -- as far as I know from the question asked -- every chance TO parent his/her own child and/or to provide her with sex education if they choose to.  The older daughter doing some herself does not prohbit the parents from their own contributions.

0
colleen I've read it a couple of April 11, 2009 - 7:45pm

I've read it a couple of times and can see no mention of the mother at all. The young woman who wrote it mentions only her father when she talks about her sex education (or, rather, lack thereof) and that in itself seems odd.It does not sound like the mother is present in the home at all so perhaps the parents are divorced, the mother is institutionalized or she (the mother) has died. 

The (to my eyes) remarkable and unusually  thoughful young woman who wrote this implies that because the father is not of help in this situation the responsibility falls on her. The fact that she does not mention their mother at all, not even when speaking of the time she was trying to figure out what sex at about at 9 or 10, tells me that, for whatever reason, the mother is not available.

It's odd that the mother isn't mentioned but why go off on folks about the existence of someone who isn't even mentioned?  

0
Harry834 and that's a point I wanted to make, April 11, 2009 - 8:11pm

regardless of what we might assume the mother to be - helpful, not helpful, smart, idiot - we really have nothing to base our assumptions on besides this letter. And, like colleen said the letter only mentions the unsupportive father and never mentions the mother. This is all we know. We do know that the daughter mentioned being afraid of "my parents" finding out about their sibling conversations, as opposed to just "my father".

So this all we have to go on. We can HOPE that the mother is supportive and helpful - and we just might know little enough for that possibility to be open.

But I think the fallacious part of your defense cmarie is that you assume the mother will be helpful, only because she's the mother. Clearly the father shows that being a parent, in and of itself, does not mean you know how to treat your children or talk to them. That abusive parents exist is further evidence.

If you want us to refrain from calling social services because we don't know enough about the parents, fine. That makes sense, and that is proper restraint. But let's not delude ourselves into thinking that a parent knows how to talk to her child, simply because she's the parent.

Not all parents are the same, and we shouldn't be required to assume they are. It should go without saying that suspecion towards one parent is NOT suspicion towards parents in general.

Everything I've said and speculated is based on the letter written. If new information comes in, if new surprsing information comes in,  lets accomadate that.

We don't need a search warrant to make assumptions (for now) based on the facts presented in the letter. It is fallacious to not entertain the thought suspecion of this particular mother (not mothers in general), and it is even more fallacious to insist that we block these thoughts.

Turning a blind eye to particular parents in front of us is NOT the right way to respect parents in general.

 

0
Harry834 The mother COULD be helpful, understanding April 11, 2009 - 8:14pm

It would be preferable to learn more if we could, but I would think the letter above - our only facts so far - should cause one to at least think that the mother MIGHT be the similar to the father.

0
Anonymous assumptions April 27, 2009 - 4:34pm

first of all, nobody said the mother was an idiot. she might just be overprotective and trying to shelter her special needs child. there are many ways that a parent can accidentally misinform, which is why we have sex ed classes in school. i think it's brave and caring of the older sister to be worried about her younger sister's sexuality and reproductive safety. a mother might be uncomfortable talking about masturbation with her child (especially if they're older, and grew up in a time where these things just weren't talked about) but the sister may have some tips. you also aren't giving the older sister much credit. she could know a lot about sex because she researched it or had a sex ed class that her sister didn't. she could know about contraceptive options that the parents have never heard of. she also probably knows more about the boys in their school and which ones you shouldn't trust, and things like that. please don't assume that people are bashing the mother just because they're praising the child. obviously the mom must be doing something right because her older daughter is so loving and caring, and wants so badly to be there for her little sis.

0
cmarie well, sounds like you all April 11, 2009 - 9:35pm

well, sounds like you all have it figured out; in the same way that the newly conservative student would probably be encouraged by his church that his younger sibling deserves to receive the light of Jesus despite his parents apathy. I guess as long as you're consistant with that thinking there's nothing to argue with. I'm still not willing to give up on the mother though. I doubt very much that she's institutionalized (hello??) or dead (writer would have mentioned that). She's got one parent who has not been helpful. Anyone who discourages her from seeking out the other parent to discuss this is not being helpful.

0
colleen Cmarie, The thing I was April 12, 2009 - 1:05am

Cmarie,

The thing I was not speculating about was that she makes no mention of her mother at all, anywhere in this letter. You appear to know that the mother is present in the home. How did you reach that conclusion? I see no hint of it. Why do you think this young woman fails to mention her mother anywhere, not even in her description of trying to educate herself about sex (at age 9 or 10)? Does it not strike you as odd that this young woman only speaks of her father?

I was not implying that I have "it figured out" anymore than anyone here is trying to, as you claim, "discourage her from trying to seek out the other parent". For whatever reason, She clearly has no intention of seeking out the other parent. I was suggesting a few of many possible reasons this particular daughter might not have mentioned her mother at all. Do you think it was just an oversight on her part?

0
Anonymous gotta work on those anger issues..... April 27, 2009 - 4:57pm

wow, cmarie, you are really angry. nobody claimed to have it all figured out; we're just offering advice when it was asked of us. you're kind of flinging accusations out where none are deserved. nobody said anything bad about the mother. i haven't mentioned her much because her daughter didn't raise the mother as a possibility for help, which might mean she's not. maybe they're divorced, maybe the mom's an alcoholic, maybe her mother always defers to the father's decisions. all we know is she didn't mention her mother so we can't assume she's there for help.

"Anyone who discourages her from seeking out the other parent to discuss this is not being helpful."
we don't actually know that the mother wouldn't be abusive if she found out. the daughter doesn't say. and if abuse is a possible outcome, then it would be very UNHELPFUL and also possibly dangerous. since we don't know, let's not assume.

oh, and i really don't get how finding a new religion (be it Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim, etc.) has anything to do with sex ed. When my aunt found eastern religion, we were all very happy for her, and would listen to her talk about it with no problem as long as she's not trying to convert me, as I like my current religion. Educate me, cool; lecture me, uncool.

0
The architect of thoughts The fundamental answer June 12, 2009 - 10:32pm

At an early stage of development - in the childhood - the majority of children are in rather favorable "contact" conditions at the expense of congenital potential and parental care. Differently, leaving from under an umbrella of parental care, the child falls under influence of the hostile world for its health more and more... It is thin architecture of interrelations it is very strong during the given period. Therefore it is necessary to lay the foundation at an initial stage...

0
Heather Corinna cmarie: I don't actually April 11, 2009 - 10:23pm

cmarie: I don't actually SEE anyone here, including myself in my answer to her, discouraging her from seeking out help from her parents. I can't figure out where you're getting that from.

In fact, I make very clear in a paragraph and a half of my answer that I think it would be ideal to have the parents support and inclusion in this.

0
Harry834 cmarie, I will concede April 11, 2009 - 11:04pm

that some of colleen's points might be speculating too far beyond the facts (especially the latter two suggestions):

"It does not sound like the mother is present in the home at all so
perhaps the parents are divorced, the mother is institutionalized or
she (the mother) has died."

But in Colleen's defense she did express her doubts and her unwillingness to speculate. This is good because having doubts in one's speculation is a healthy skepticism.

 

0
Harry834 doubts April 11, 2009 - 11:07pm

"It's odd that the mother isn't mentioned but why go off on folks about the existence of someone who isn't even mentioned? "

 

0
Hannah Simon I wonder June 26, 2009 - 9:30pm

I wonder if any 17 year old can adequately teach her younger sister what I've just discussed. I'm thinking that in order for a young person to really get that sex is not a series of emissions, techniques and prohibitions, she needs a teacher who can reflect back to her what is probably right now both inchoate and insistent. RespectIsSexy might need this herself.
Hannah
Social Media Marketing Services