RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

Save the Endangered Abortion Provider!

By Dr. Suzanne Poppema, Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health

March 10, 2009 - 8:00am

Dr. Suzanne Poppema's picture

In the 1990s, I ran an abortion clinic near Seattle, Washington. A most rewarding career - in all my years as a physician, I've never had so many patients thank me for helping them. But at the same time, I worried that I belonged to an endangered species. 

Like the spotted owl, our habitats were being invaded and destroyed - not by loggers but by anti-choice protestors. These were the years of virulent anti-abortion activity, when my colleagues faced arson and acid attacks all too often. One doctor told me about a day when he performed an abortion as members of Operation Rescue battered down the clinic doors with a telephone pole. When he finished the procedure, his terrified patient got up, hugged him so tight he could barely move, and said, "You can't leave us now." 

Those of us providing abortions in the 1990s were determined to stay with our patients. But like an endangered species, we were restricted to such a small habitat that we could not expand our numbers. Medical schools and residencies often failed to teach physicians-in-training about abortion or made it near impossible for residents to train at an outside clinic. Meanwhile, the provider population was getting older. Many doctors continued working past retirement age so their patients wouldn't have to travel hundreds of miles to get an abortion. 

The threats abortion providers faced in the 1990s did have one benefit: they rallied the provider community to preserve this endangered - but highly valued - species of physicians. We formed new organizations, like Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health and Medical Students for Choice, that were dedicated to training the next generation of providers and reducing the stigma around abortion. In 1996, March 10 was declared a National Day of Appreciation for Abortion Providers. We're still waiting for Hallmark to make us a special line of greeting cards, but the very existence of a day honoring abortion providers is a step in the right direction. 

The threats to abortion providers have changed since the 1990s. Violent attacks, thankfully, have diminished. Our pro-choice president is quietly reversing some of the most egregious policies of the Bush administration, including a midnight regulation allowing a broad range of medical workers to refuse to provide reproductive healthcare. 

But abortion providers aren't off the endangered species list yet. Even as federal policies improve, many states are doing their best to limit abortion. The latest anti-choice gambit requires doctors to provide an ultrasound - and often play a fetal heartbeat - for any woman who wants an abortion. As if she hasn't already thought hard enough about her decision! I treated thousands of women at my clinic, and not a single one took her choice lightly. 

While we try to fend off state legislatures, we also watch out for the Supreme Court, which is just one vote away from overturning Roe v. Wade. The most conservative justices are likely to remain on the Court for decades. And too few medical schools and residency programs offer training in abortion, especially for specialties like family medicine. Even doctors who identify as pro-choice aren't always willing to offer abortion services. 

Want to help save the endangered abortion provider? Here are three things you can do today. If you know a doctor who provides abortions, thank them for what they do. Call or write to your elected officials and ask them to consult with an abortion provider before voting on any abortion-related legislation. Too often, bills are passed without input from the very people they affect most. Finally, if you've had an abortion, tell someone about it. One in three women will have an abortion by age 45, yet it remains a taboo topic. The more we can talk openly and honestly about women's abortion experiences, the more we can reduce the stigma around this procedure.


. . . . .
81 comments
Please login or register to post comments...

Thank you to all abortion providers for standing up for what is right in difficult times and for providing life-saving care for women. You are very much appreciated!

Submitted by Anonymous on March 10, 2009 - 8:35am.

"One in three women will have an abortion by age 45, yet it remains a taboo topic. The more we can talk openly and honestly about women's abortion experiences, the more we can reduce the stigma around this procedure." --This is key!

Thank you to all abortion providers for caring about the lives of women. You risk your lives to provide women with a safe procedure and a kind heart. Thank you!

Submitted by Shannon E O'Malley on March 10, 2009 - 8:48am.

Thank you to all the abortion providers and individuals who have worked hard to keep a woman's choice HER OWN! How can anyone call themselves equal or even free without the basic human right to decide when and whether to become a mother. Thank you from the bottom of my heart!

Submitted by Anonymous on March 10, 2009 - 12:39pm.

Maybe you should not open your legs until your ready 2 have a baby whatever you do or did is your own dam fault not a baby's, abortion providers are no better than the person getting the abortion 2 me you are weak and just a all around bad person much like a murderer except its legal

Submitted by anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 9:07am.

So, Anonymous, every time you have sex you either get pregnant or impregnate someone? Since you completely dismiss the presence of contraception; "shouldn't open your legs till you're ready for a baby" is it safe to assume you don't believe in contraception either?


Do you think women are the gatekeepers of sex and the guardians of morality and they must be bastions of perfection and self-control? I notice that you don't mention men in your little missive, not even passively. So, they are free to do as wish, and are totally blameless, but women must be angels? You don't think that women have complex lives they may not want to bring a child into and that every sex act is some wanton succubus satisfying her rampant loins for which she must be punished with childbirth?


Pull your damn head out of the sand. Life isn't in black and white.

Submitted by Princess Rot on March 11, 2009 - 9:35am.

Wow, Princess Rot. I am saddened by abortion but believe in free choice and my reply is not on the issue of abortion at all, but to tell you that you are a heck of a good writer!

Submitted by laurierl on April 28, 2009 - 12:30pm.

I have spent most of my life in the most profoundly rewarding work I can imagine--abortion services. I have been privileged to be with women at a time in their lives that calls forth their courage and love and honesty. I recommend that anyone who is passionate about justice, who has an open mind and an open heart and wants to make a difference every day look into this extraordinary work

Submitted by Charlotte Taft on March 10, 2009 - 1:55pm.

While I don't know any abortion providers either personally or in my area, since haven't looked for one, I'd like to extend my thanks to you.

You're a beautifully brave doctor for sticking with your patients through thick and thin, especially after some of the horror stories I've heard in the states.

Submitted by Jamie on March 10, 2009 - 6:40pm.

Christina Dunigan fails to mention that her link is to an exceptionally lame blog entry  which claims to document injuries and deaths to women have experienced during abortion procedures.

 

 

Submitted by colleen on March 10, 2009 - 6:48pm.

Without you, and your courageous kind, women would be dying in back alleys from botched abortions. THANK YOU from the bottom of my heart. We MUST protect the future for young women coming up. WE WILL NEVER GO BACK to a time when abortion is illegal again....NEVER!!

Submitted by JAN on March 10, 2009 - 6:51pm.

I've never had an abortion but I'm glad to know that it was an option if I ever needed it, which is why I'm a clinic escort. Once a month I stand there on a Saturday to make sure people can access the property without being harassed by those who have the unmitigated gall to think they have the right to make a decision for others.

Submitted by ldavid56 on March 11, 2009 - 11:13am.

Yes, of course it is. But for a pro-choice person to criticize others for "think[ing] they have the right to make a decision for others" is absurd. You're making the decision to end another person's life.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 1:16pm.

... they are making the decision to have a legal medical procedure to end a pregnancy. Nobody has the right to make that decision but the woman who is pregnant. Not the government, not a religion, not a sidewalk screamer who is engaging in anti-woman slacktivism.

Submitted by TheRealistMom on March 11, 2009 - 2:19pm.

That at no point during pregnancy is the fetus, in fact, a human with the same rights as everyone else.

Plus, not every pro-life person is motivated by religion. I, for one, am an atheist.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 3:48pm.

if you take this choice out of women's hands, this choice which affects them more than any of the screaming judgers, then you are an oppressor.

Submitted by Harry834 on March 11, 2009 - 4:00pm.

is it a person, with all the same rights as everyone else, or not?

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 4:32pm.

NO!

Submitted by JAN on March 11, 2009 - 6:56pm.

is it a person, with all the same rights as everyone else, or not?

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 4:32pm.

it's not a person, and does not have the same rights as everyborn else.

Submitted by TeeDub on March 11, 2009 - 4:41pm.

Cells in a uterus are not a child-
As many have said- your concern for children is touching- so go take care of them- they inhabit orphanages, they are living in cars, in tents, in boxes, are going without proper food, medicine,education they are being raped, mutilated and killed . Every day.
Please help us take care of these poor children- and stop worrying about a collection of cells.

Submitted by Anon on March 11, 2009 - 4:44pm.

One, you have no idea what I've done to help people. You would be wise to not make those kind of assumptions.

Two, why can't a "clump of cells" indeed be a person? Because it doesn't look like a person?

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 4:51pm.

I am making no assumptions whatsoever about what you have done to help people. Looks to me like you are being more that a tad defensive, understandable given your clap trap about cells being human beings.

Submitted by Anon on March 11, 2009 - 5:07pm.

If I dropped cyanide on a petri dish of human fertilized eggs, am I a murderer? Should there be laws to prosecute me?

Submitted by Harry834 on March 11, 2009 - 6:23pm.

if fertilized eggs are persons, entitled to equal human rights, than are we to do a watch everytime a woman has her period. After all, there's a chance that the eggs that wash out are fertilized, and letting these "children" wash away without verifying them would be like giving up the search for missing children after a natural disaster.

They are persons, are they not?

Submitted by Harry834 on March 11, 2009 - 6:26pm.

When did yours begin? When will it end? Who says? How do you know?
K in Ky.

Submitted by K in Ky. on March 16, 2009 - 11:50am.

Really, some of you people must come from the lowest rung on the evolutionary scale. A person is a person by birth. If a fetus is stillborn, it is not considered a person, as it had no life. It gets no birth certificate. It is only real to a woman who wanted it and dreamed for and imagined what it's life would be like. If you miscarry at any time in the pregnacy, it gets no birth or death certificate, because it was in gestation, and not recognized as a human being, which is defined as live birth at end period of gestation, when seperated from the mother and can breathe on it's own.

Submitted by JAN on March 11, 2009 - 8:55pm.

That isn't anti-choice because of religion. I am proud of you. Still, I and other women won't live our lives by YOUR opinion of their not being a God either!! So, what is your POINT??

Submitted by JAN on March 11, 2009 - 6:53pm.

IF you are an athiest, and that's a pretty big "IF," then you are still not without a religion--a religion of controlling women's lives. If you're the same anonymous who doesn't want women to "open their legs" as commented previously, then you also practice the religion of misogyny.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 12, 2009 - 4:25am.

It is not a person until birth. It is a zygote or fetus. The definition of a person in most dictionaries is: A born human. It has to be born to have a life. Birth is the beginning of a person's life. I don't know how to make it any more clear for you.

Submitted by JAN on March 11, 2009 - 6:47pm.

How macabre that those who so dismissively refer to a preborn human being as "zygote," or "clump of cells," or any other medical misnomer when, in fact, it is a fully functional human being no different from you and me except in size. Your chilling terminology harkens back to another period of history when another group of individuals justified the mass extermination of living, breathing human beings by calling THEM nonpersons as well.

Hitler, Himmler, Mengele, Goebbels, et. al. would all be very proud of you.

Make excuses all you want, people, but it is an irrefutable, biological fact: a fetus is a human being and at no point "becomes" one. This human being exists from the moment the sperm and egg are one, and not before. Once this instantaneous event occurs, what results is a human being with everything he/she will be until this human dies, either naturally or by the intentional killing done under the feel-good guise of "choice."

Submitted by Randy on March 12, 2009 - 2:11pm.

The so-called pro-lifers are really pro-control-women's bodies. So THAT makes them authoritarians like Hitler. With all the wealth of the RCC and the personal wealth of relgious pimps like Pat Robertson, you'd think their blind followers would say, "Gee that money ought to go to the poor, the widows, the orphaned, the hungry, the naked, etc." Their wealth is an obsenity. They'd rather raise more money by falling back on the Eve problem--manufacturing outrage over "women's sins." The bible says virtually nothing about abortion. It's the male patriarchy of the church that interprets the bible. Abortion and contraception have been around forever. You'd think it would have mentioned if it were such a horrible sin. It does, however, say so much about justice for the downtrodden. But that just doesn't motivate the blame-everything-on-Eve crowd, does it. For all the money and power these wealthy religious institutions have, the money, attention, and advocacy they devote to the real message of their god is neglible. Terminating a pregnancy is more than a choice, it's a moral decision carefully made by a moral agent. But this is heresy to your crowd. Nobody is forcing your women to have abortions. Your women can never be moral agents unless they make the contents of their uteruses public knowledge and property. Well, America is founded by a secular constitution, and equality has been extended to women. If you want a theocracy, you'll have to find another country to live in.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 12, 2009 - 3:07pm.

not another lame equation of abortion with the Holocaust. It's lazy thinking. The only comparison between Jews and fetuses lies in their humanitiy. Any attempts to broaden that is an insult to those who suffered in Hitler's death camps.  And while we're on the subject: Hitler was anti-abortion for "Aryan" women; abortion was expessly forbidden so every little "Master" fetus would be carried to term and born.

I've been discussing this subject long enough with pro lifers, anti-abortion folks and anti choicers (beleive me,there are distinctions) long enough to just crack a smile whenever someone claims that correct terminnology  - gamete, zygote, blastocyst, embryo, fetus - is just a "medical misnomer".  You obviously are not qualified to lecture on biology here : In no way is the zygote "fully functional", it would not survive a moment if seperated from the mother's womb. 

 

Your grievance shall be avenged.

Submitted by otaku1960 on March 12, 2009 - 7:32pm.

I wanted to pull Godwin's Law on this thread. "The only comparison between Jews and fetuses lies in their humanity. Any attempts to broaden that is an insult to those who suffered in Hitler's death camps." is why I couldn't make myself laugh enough to do it. (Though to be fair, I also have a tendency to take that particular comparison super-personally as a Jew who works for an abortion provider.)

Submitted by Airina on April 4, 2009 - 4:09pm.

Don't forget to thank ALL of the abortion practitioners.

That inlcudes Osathanondh, the abortion practitioner in Massachusetts who has plead not guilty last year to charges of manslaughter.

He killed 22-year-old Laura Smith in a botched legal abortion and was indicted by a grand jury after an investigation by local police, state police and the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine.

Osathanondh gave up his medical license permanently after a state medical board suspended it following the abortion death.

And Sachida Mudaliar who is still on trial for the March 2003 death of a woman in a botched abortion he did.

Don't forget Pierre Renelique, the Florida abortion practitioner who neglected to come to the abortion business when one patient gave birth to a baby on the second-day of a two-part abortion procedure.

And there is Rashid Sandhu -- the abortion practitioner found guilty of sexually abusing a teenage patient after learning she was pregnant. Sandhu will head to prison for eight years after a sentencing hearing last year.

And Mark Schulberg.

He is an Australian abortion practitioner who did a late-term abortion on a mentally disabled woman without her consent. Authorities there also learned Schulberg failed to contact authorities about the fact the woman was raped.

Closer to home, there is the case of Deborah Lyn Levich, the Alabama abortion practitioner who directed a nurse to give the dangerous mifepristone abortion drug to a woman in the latter stages of pregnancy. The FDA says the abortion drug is only safe during the first few weeks a woman is considering an abortion.

State officials investigated Levich's abortion center and said they found "egregious lapses in care, including non-physicians performing abortions, severely underestimating the gestational age of a fetus, failure to appropriately refer or treat a patient with a dangerously elevated blood pressure, and performing an abortion on a late-term pregnancy."

Eventually, Levich allowed her medical license to lapse after the abortion business was permanently closed.

Since we like to keep patient records private, let's not forget Albert Hodari.

Hodari and his chain of abortion businesses were given probation this year in a case involving the illegal dumping of patient records. Members of a local pro-life group found biohazard waste and medical records at the Womancare abortion business.

Womancare received a six month probationary period and Hodari pled no contest to twelve counts from the Oakland County prosecutor's office of violating Michigan law requiring the proper filing and disposal of patient records.

If paperwork motivates us, then we should thank Hamid Hussain Sheikh. He is the Kentucky abortion practitioner who engaged in such shoddy practices that state officials temporarily suspended his medical license.

That action came after Sheikh pleaded not guilty to charges that he wrongly billed the state for abortions at his business.

Sheikh was arrested after Attorney General Greg Stumbo conducted an investigation and found he erroneously reported abortions as ultrasounds in Medicaid billing records. He was indicted on four counts of billing Medicaid for abortions and could face 20 years in prison if convicted on all counts.

Let's not forget how many abortion providers kill their patients, put women's health at risk and break the law. They deserve appreciation as well, right?

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 11:31am.

I didn't bother to read your rambling post past the first few lines. Don't you know that there are a few soldiers or officers of the law who abuse their power and kill people? There are clergymen who sexually abuse children and women. Shall we stop having soldiers to defend us and policement to protect us? I don't want to not attend my place of worship and be led by lay people all the time. You would lump all abortion providers in with the providers you listed above. So your point is moot. However, I appreciate the vast majority of abortion providers who save women's lives, in spite of you.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 12, 2009 - 4:48am.

you also killed another.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 1:14pm.

If you don't believe that women should have the right to abortion, then don't have one. To you it's killing or murdering. To others it is their very lives. Of course, you realize that if you ban the procedure, women wll resort to back-ally providers. Most women have always, always tried to control the number of children they had. And they always will. THAT's what bothers you. YOU aren't in control of their lives.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 12, 2009 - 5:15am.

Thanks for the jod you do for women. I think any woman has a right to decide whether to give birth to the child or go to abortion providers.

Submitted by mattew on May 20, 2009 - 7:42am.

I had an abortion and now wish to repeal Roe. No one counciled me properly. I am in the process of becoming Catholic so I can go to confession and at least mitigate some of my monstrous guilt. I am 51 years old. It has been 34 years, yet, I can't stop thinking about it. I wish I had given the baby up for adoption. If people like you ever performed a partial birth abortion - God help your soul...

Submitted by Jane Doe on March 11, 2009 - 1:21pm.

And I say this with all sincerity. Assuming your story is true (and this simply because a lot of the anti-choice stories that get tossed around here aren't true but setups by sock puppets, nothing personal), you need assistance in moving past a choice that was incorrect for you. I'm not sure what "counciling" you didn't get- surely you knew an abortion was ending a pregnancy and in the process killing the fetus. Either way, it sounds like having an abortion wasn't the appropriate choice for you. That's what this whole debate is about- we want people to have the ability to make the choice that is right for them.

I have to ask though- do you honestly think carrying the pregnancy to term and giving the resulting infant up for adoption would have been "easier"?  Particulaly in the climate that still existed for single pregnant women 34 years ago? I am only 36 and in my lifetime I have already seen major shifts in the acceptance of single mothers, though tehre is obviously still a long way to go. If you were that attached to the fetus you carried to where you now feel you "killed a baby", would you have been able to give a full-term baby over to strangers?

 Religion isn't the answer- particularly a guilt-based religion. If you honestly feel you need to "confess" a sin to your deity you don't have to join some organized church and have some intermediary do it for you, or have them lay some kind of punishment on you. This is something between your own conscience and your own deity.  This is where mental health counciling comes in to help you deal with your feelings.

For the record, just because I can't stand to see blatant misrepresentation of facts- there is no such medical procedure as a "partial birth abortion" . The intact dialation and extraction procedure is used in those circumstances when other late-term options may be harzardous to the woman (as inducing labor might kill a woman in severe toxemia, or a fetus with severe hydrocephaly cannot fit safely through the birth canal) or when there is a severe fetal defect that forces a woman to choose to end a very wanted pregnancy, or if the fetus has already died in-utero.  Delivering the fetus intact gives the parents a chance to mourn their wanted infant, a chance to hold them and say goodbye. Despite what anti-choice rhetoric wants you to believe women don't just wander into a clinic visibly pregnant and say, "Gimme one of them partial-birth abortions I wanna go drinking this weekend" or whatever bullshit they spew.

Submitted by TheRealistMom on March 11, 2009 - 2:36pm.

Realist gave you an excellent answer and advice. I hope that you take her advice and seek professional counseling, not religious dogma and guilt tripping.
If you have a god, speak with him directly,let him help you. You don't need a priest for that.

Submitted by Anon on March 11, 2009 - 3:10pm.

Partial birth abortion. A fetus is either born at the end of gestation (9 months) or miscarried or aborted. PERIOD. Over 90% of abortions occur in the first three months, the rest in the second trimester. The only reason a woman would seek an abortion in the last three months, which is extremely rare, is if she has a medical condition or something is wrong with the fetus and her doctor recommends it. Most legitimate doctors would NOT perform an abortion except in these RARE circumstances in the last three months (when it could be viable , ie, live on it's own) unless their is a problem with the pregnacy. There is no such medical term as partial birth abortion. I find your story fishy. If you have felt so bad after all of these years, as you claim, then you are one in a million. I know many women who have had abortions and have felt no guilt. it makes no sense that you want to end legal abortion, which won't stop it, but would drive women to back alley butchers, or underground (getting the abortion pills from Canada and other places) but your wanting to make women undergo unsafe abortions because of your supposed "guilt" is selfish and nasty and woman hating. I agree with the other poster. IF your story is true (and I have my doubts) you need a psychiatrist. BADLY. Not to selfishly punish other women for your supposed guilt.

Submitted by JAN on March 12, 2009 - 5:55am.

For Murderers? How touching.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 1:25pm.

So there aren't any cards for Dark Agers either. In lieu of that, consider this my card to you.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 12, 2009 - 4:54am.

I have set in a delivery room holding my daughter, Abby, who was still-born at 20 weeks. She was and is the most beautiful thing I have ever seen. She was not a clump of cells or an inatimate object, she was a person. To think that we live in a society that allows people to openly murder these babies and celebrate that murder in the callaus manner you describe haunts me every day of my life. There are two people involved in an abortion. As a society, we have an obligation to protect the most innocent, pure and defenseless among us.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 1:53pm.

you had a miscarriage. Still birth means that you went through the whole pregnancy, (9 months) and then gave birth to a dead baby.(hence the term, still BIRTH) A miscarriage is not considered a person, as there is no birth or death certificate. I know it is still painful, for the woman who wanted to have a baby and miscarries, and had hopes and dreams for the fetus that was not meant, by nature, to survive, but that is the truth of it.

Submitted by JAN on March 11, 2009 - 9:07pm.

First, you are wrong. If a baby dies after 20 weeks it is considered a still-birth. If it dies earlier, it is a miscarriage.

More importantly, you completely miss the point. Abby was a person. She was beautiful. My love for her is no different than the love for my other children.

Babies die. I understand that. Natural causes ment that she could not survive.

The point is, we have to recognize that abortion impacts more than one person. It literally makes me ill that people celebrate the taking of this innocent life.

Submitted by Anonymous on March 12, 2009 - 12:29pm.

My definition. A miscarriage is when a fetus could not poosibly survive on it's own. No fetus survives at 20 weeks! So, it is a miscarriage if it ides in the womb, NOT a still BIRTH.

Submitted by JAN on March 12, 2009 - 9:10pm.

Actually, neither of you are using the correct medical terminology. I know this is a stale thread, but nothing bugs me more than an anti-choice, ignorant, opinionated commenter who specifically goes to pro-choice sites and then speaks incorrectly about so called medical facts and definitions.

Before 20 weeks gestation (since the last menstrual period began), any pregnancy loss of any kind is called an ABORTION. If it occurs "naturally", without medical induction, it is classified as a "spontaneous abortion". Miscarriage is NOT a medical term. Neither is stillborn. The term would be "fetal demise".

After 20 weeks, it would be termed a "preterm delivery", and if the fetus had no signs of fetal life, it would be called a fetal demise at however many weeks. However, even if it is called a "preterm delivery", no one, not even the American Academy of Pediatrics, advocates even attempting resuscitation until at least 24 weeks or beyond.

The story about a 20 week old fetus dying in her arms is tragic. But it is also proof that a 20 week old fetus is not capable of independent life. It is not alive. Pregnancy

A wanted pregnancy with an unwanted ending is tragic. An unintended pregnancy is tragic. Why do people have such a hard time realizing that there is not a trade-off between these two scenarios? One woman can easily have many experiences with pregnancy, wanted and unwanted, over the course of one lifetime.

Submitted by MomTFH on April 8, 2009 - 9:33am.

If you performed a retroactive abortion on yourself, think of all of the lives you would be saving!

Submitted by Anonymous on March 11, 2009 - 1:53pm.