RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

Caving On Contraception? Obama and House Democrats Say Maybe So

By

January 26, 2009 - 8:40pm

Anonymous's picture

No sooner had Nancy Pelosi announced a provision in the economic stimulus package bill that would help states fund Medicaid programs for family planning, SCHIP and other critical health services, than Republicans and the mainstream media erupted in confusion and anger.

Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner (R) asked how contraception would help stimulate the economy unaware, apparently, that access to family planning and contraception for women and their families decreases the rate of unplanned pregnancy which saves literally billions of dollars in public funds. The family planning funding provision, along with the Medicaid waiver, was not inserted into the package for convenience. It was put in the package because the provision of these services makes economic sense. 

This is not controversial. Or at least there is no need for it to be. Unless, of course, we are still fighting anti-contraception forces?

Unfortunately, some House Democrats, at the behest of the Obama administration, are saying they will cave to Republicans and remove this provision

The AP reports:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democratic officials say House leaders are seriously considering deleting family planning funds for the low-income from an economic stimulus bill headed for a vote later in the week.

These Democrats say the Obama administration made the request for the change. Republicans have been critical of the provision, which is included in the $825 billion bill.


Why would the Obama administration request the removal of a provision to ensure that state Medicaid programs be allowed to provide contraception to low-income families? And why would House leaders cave to this request?

It is a poor portend of what's to come if this goes through.


. . . . .
1 comment
Please login or register to post comments...

This is truly outrageous and it follows a time-honored pattern by male-controlled governments: when the going gets rough and you have to bail out the boat, throw women's issues over the side! This is espeicially true when you've just been elected with women's votes, so now, for awhile you don't need anything from women.

Obama gave signals that he'd cave on women's reproductive rights from the beginning, with hes "let's find common ground with the right" rhetoric.

The really sad thing is that the women who will be impacted by this will be primarily poor and Black, since these are the women on Medicaid, to whom Roe v Wade is irrelevant, because they don't have access--and haven't since the Hyde Ammendment stopped Medicaid from paying for abortions in 1976. Since then, individual States have opted to pay for Medicaid funded abortions--but now this too will be taken away. So this is not just a betrayal of women, but particularly of the poor and of racial minorities--just the people who assumed that an Obama Administration would protect them!

There must be a huge outcry immediately--since this hasn't gone through yet and is only being "considered". It might be a test balloon to see if women and our supporters will protest. I suggest everyone email/phone their Senators and Obama's website (is it change.gov?) and let him know there will be political consequences to this action if it goes through.

Thanks for posting about this--you beat out NOW and all the other big feminist orgs--and for giving the rationale of why this IS about stimulating the economy.

Fran Luck
Executive Producer,
Joy of Resistance; Multicultural Feminist Radio @ WBAI,
99.5 FM, NYC

Submitted by Fran Luck on January 27, 2009 - 8:13pm.