Thirty-six years ago, the Supreme Court decision that argued that a woman's fundamental right to privacy included the right to decide to terminate a pregnancy. And yet in years since, the Court argued that this "right" existed for women even when women couldn't make use of it -- when abortion was too expensive, or the provider too far away. The Court refused to hold the government accountable for making abortion accessible to women. On this 36th anniversary of Roe, RH Reality Check asked prominent reproductive justice writers and activists what Roe meant to them and the women they serve -- and why Roe is not enough to ensure all women have access to reproductive choice.

RH Reality Check: What is the significance of Roe to you and to the women you serve?

Miriam Perez, Senior Advocacy Associate at the National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health:

For the women we work with, many of whom come from countries in Latin America where abortion is still criminalized, Roe has the potential to have a huge impact on their lives. Roe has the potential to make reproductive health services just like any other healthcare need a woman has, it has the potential to make a usually clandestine procedure safe and accessible. Unfortunately for them, the Roe decision has been weakened and diluted by subsequent legislation. The Hyde Amendment, in particular, has seriously stunted the potential of Roe. Because of these laws, we have a long way to go for low-income and immigrant women to really feel the full affects of this historic Supreme Court decision.

Toni Bond Leonard, Board President, National Network of Abortion Funds:

As I think about Roe on this 36th anniversary, I cannot help but reflect on the stories I have heard from women who have been unable to realize the constitutional protections it was created to afford all women. For low-income women, women of color, Native American and indigenous women, immigrant women, and young women, Roe is an unfilled promise. Although Roe held that a woman may terminate her pregnancy for any reason up until the point at which a fetus is viable, far too many women are forced to do just the opposite. Roe was supposed to support and affirm a woman's constitutional right to privacy and human right to be self-determining about her body. The landmark case that was our answer and solution to back-alley abortions and far too many lives being lost due to unsafe and illegal abortion has been forever tainted by the Hyde Amendment passed in 1976. Roe gave women the ability to literally save their own lives through empowering them to make critical decisions about when to parent. Unfortunately, the Hyde Amendment came along and robbed those women who lacked the economic means of that right. Roe has been the proverbial carrot that has been dangled before the eyes of poor women and cruelly yanked from them through the Hyde Amendment. For poor women in grassroots communities around this country, Roe has yet to be fully realized. It is a constitutional right that sounds good in theory but still is not a reality for the women who call member funds of the National Network of Abortion Funds.

Loretta J. Ross, National Coordinator, and Serena Garcia, Communications Coordinator, SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective:

The decision and impact of Roe v. Wade has facilitated our ability to make healthy decisions about our bodies, sexuality and reproduction for ourselves, our families and our communities in all areas of our lives.

Aspen Baker, Executive Director, Exhale:

I was born on the third anniversary of Roe v Wade. I have grown up only knowing legal abortion and the war that surrounds it, which is something else I share in common with thousands of women and men who call Exhale's post-abortion talkline every year looking for emotional support. That many of us know to be true is that despite its legality, abortion remains taboo, a big secret, something to hide rather than share. I see the anniversary of Roe as an opportunity to listen to the voices of those who have had legal abortions over the last 36 years and to learn from their experiences. They are the ones that can point us towards a better, more peaceful path for abortion in the US for the next 36 years.

Maria Luisa Sanchez Fuentes, executive director of the Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida (GIRE), or the Information Group on Reproductive Choice:

Legal abortion [obtained for women living in Mexico City nearly two years ago] has given women relief, confidence in public hospitals, and the freedom to choose what is best for their lives. It has reduced embarrassment and guilt. And it has made them more careful of their sexual lives.

RH Reality Check: Is Roe enough? What does our country need in addition to Roe to ensure reproductive justice for all women?

Miriam Perez:

Roe isn't enough because privacy is not enough. That narrow legal framework has only barely protected our legal right to access the procedure. It says nothing about access, about funding, about autonomy and barriers. It says nothing about justice. It has not addressed those who based on moral and religious convictions try to limit the health care women can receive. It has not addressed those who want women's bodies to be manipulated in service of a religious agenda and who want the fetus's rights to be placed about those of the mother. We need a lot more than a shaky legal framework to stand on if we want to achieve reproductive justice.

Toni Bond Leonard:

Each day, when the phone rings with a call from another woman in need of financial assistance for a safe abortion, I am again reminded that Roe is not enough. Is Roe enough? No, it is not enough to merely say that a woman has a constitutional right to determine when and whether to have a child. It is not enough when we live everyday with funding restrictions that prohibit women from making life changing decisions about their bodies, their lives. To realize true reproductive justice, women need access to the full range of reproductive health care. That includes, family planning, safe contraceptives, and safe abortion services. Our country has to become a place that promotes a reproductive justice agenda that creates and supports the conditions where women live in homes and communities free from all forms of sexual and domestic violence. Ours must become a country that sets an example for the rest of the world of how women live free from all forms of sexual oppression. To realize true reproductive justice, women must be entrusted to be the true agents of their own lives afforded with the economic and social supports to make the best decisions for themselves, their families, and their communities. The reproductive justice framework is one that promotes a holistic approach to creating a society where women are healthy, have healthy families and live in healthy communities. This means living in a country where citizens have jobs paying living wages, safe and adequate housing, affordable health care, access to safe, healthy foods, and sustainable and clean environments. True reproductive justice means that women not only are able to make and exercise decisions about having an abortion, but also have the social and economic supports to raise and parent children. Women need access to pre- and post-natal care, as well as support for the right to play pivotal roles in decisions about labor and delivery experiences. Women incarcerated must be afforded the right to receive abortion services and have birthing experiences with dignity and not shackled down to beds like animals. Parenting women with substance abuse problems must receive social and economic assistance and support to not only live substance free but have access to services and housing that support them being fully functioning mothers enabled and empowered to raise their children and not have them taken away to become a part of a failed child welfare system. It is only when this country redresses these and other problems will we be a country that has ended the sexual and reproductive oppression of women and realized true reproductive justice.

Loretta Ross and Serena Garcia:

As activists, we have insisted that reproductive justice evolves simultaneously as a theory, a strategy, and a practice. As a critical theory, it incorporates an intersectional analysis based on the human rights framework applied to reproductive politics.

When we conform, we lose sight of who we really are. By centering our analysis on articulating what it would take to end the reproductive oppression of women of color, we break out of the endless circularity of abortion debates - pro or con - and seek a new understanding of our lived experiences.

Aspen Baker:

Roe, and the zero-sum/win-lose attitude that surrounds it, has defined the conversation about abortion for far too long. Yes, the legality of abortion is the crux of this war, but one of the ways out of war is to  xpand the conversation and raise new voices and perspectives on divisive issues. We can do this by addressing many important reproductive and sexual health issues that have not gotten the attention they need and deserve and by creating new ways to think and understand the role of abortion in all our lives. Right now, all of us are excited and overwhelmed not just by the promise and practice of unity over  partisanship, but by real-life examples of what can happen when you address people's real needs and give them the opportunity to make change in their own lives and those of their communities. Let us learn from these lessons but most importantly, let us recognize, support, promote and help grow the efforts of those who are already doing it well and finding success, like Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice, California Latinas for Reproductive Justice, Gay-Straight Alliance Network and many others whose strategies have been under valued and under appreciated in an era defined by Roe. The truth is an experience with abortion is often just one part of a person's story and its time we listened to the whole story, and responded and supported the whole person.