For me, adolescence was a beautiful, yet confusing, period. Coming into my own as a sexual being, a young woman, with sexual desires and curiosities was troublesome for me because by and large I lived in a world that taught me that I was a "bad girl" for feeling that way. Managing sex and my sexuality was not something I was ever taught about...not in school or in my home. Sex was just something that should have been avoided at all costs. End of story.
Much of what
I learned about sex as a teenager I either learned from my peers, or
I figured out by myself. Like many of those around me I entered
into sexual relationships early and, by the age of fifteen, I was already
making my way through the concerns that come with being sexually active:
the threat of pregnancy; pap smears; and negotiating condom use.
Sadly, for many teenagers, the sexual landscape is still very uncertain and unsure terrain and many of their concerns and questions still go unanswered. Even in the age of information the issue of sexual activity and interest amongst adolescents is still a taboo one. When I was a teenager the biggest concern amongst my peer group was pregnancy; but for teenagers these days, a lack of information and avenues for safe discussion is potentially far more dangerous.
With this past month's commemoration of World AIDS Day, the uncertainty of this sexual terrain was sharply brought into focus with news reports pointing to notable increases in HIV/AIDS infection amongst the 15-24 age group. With data released by the Jamaican Ministry of Health and the Environment indicating that AIDS is the second leading cause of death for youths in this age group, the risks associated with inadequate information, access and unsafe sexual practices have been highlighted as key areas for concern.
Against this backdrop, the focus for December 2008's commemoration of World AIDS Day has been placed on youth; with leaders in the political, education and health arenas calling on young Jamaicans to adopt a proactive and leadership role in stemming the spread of the disease, and in increasing tolerance for those affected. Calling on young people in the 15 - 24 age group to become advocates and agents of change, one official from the Ministry of Health's National HIV/STI Control Programme reaffirmed the unit's commitment to equip "young people with the necessary information, skills and attitude to stay HIV-free".
Interestingly however, the official position taken by another arm of the government, the Ministry of Education, has remained steadfast in its resistance to the distribution of condoms in Jamaican schools. The ministry has instead reaffirmed that its' focus will be on its' health and family life education program, which is designed to provide students with access to information that would empower them to make healthy lifestyle decisions.
While acknowledging the "cultural context" in which many students live, which may lead to early initiation of sexual activity, Minister of Education Andrew Holness has refused to supply students with condoms in the schools. This principle is in direct conflict with that of the Ministry of Health, whose policy allows for the provision of condoms to adolescents through its' local health centers. Access through these centers has however been reportedly undermined by adolescents' unwillingness to go into the clinics to receive condoms, because of the condescending attitudes of the health care workers.
Therefore, despite an official approach which supports the empowerment of adolescents, the Ministry of Education is still undermining the right of these teenagers to protect themselves.
Students themselves
have issued
a call for access
to condoms through schools. Noting their unwillingness to make use of
other avenues such as the health centers, students themselves have noted
that condoms should be made accessible through schools' guidance counselors.
It seems hypocritical
to me to make a statement regarding the empowerment of adolescents while steadfastly denying them access to a range of choices. This
continues to rely heavily on a moralistic approach based
on the idea that students themselves do not know how to manage their
behavior and by extension their sexual lives.
























