RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

Will McCain Also Define Contraception as Abortion?

Nancy Keenan's picture

Last week we learned how questions about birth control cause John McCain's so-called "Straight Talk Express" to veer off track in a big way (watch this priceless-but-disturbing video clip for a first-hand look). Now, thanks to the Bush administration's proposed regulations that could discourage doctors and health clinics from providing women with access to contraception, birth control is back in the picture -- and that's not good news for McCain. The Straight Talk Express is going to hit a few more bumps. 

The fundamental question for McCain is whether he thinks birth control programs should cover birth control.  

Do we seriously have to ask this question in 2008? Yes, yes, we do. Let's remember we are talking about someone who voted against family planning twenty-two times.   

Here are just four examples of how the Bush regulations could affect women's access to contraception: 

  • This regulation could affect good state laws that require hospitals to provide emergency contraception to rape victims.

  • The regulation could undermine laws that ensure pharmacies fill women's prescriptions for birth control. (The Straight Talk Express should stop by some pharmacy counters and ask women what they think about this one. I'm just making the suggestion.)

  • The proposal could allow health-care corporations (hospitals, HMOs, and health plans) to refuse to provide services or make referrals not only for abortion but also for birth control.

  • Twenty seven states have laws requiring health-care plans to cover contraception on an equal basis with other prescription medications. This draft regulation could threaten that guarantee, on which millions of women rely for their birth control.

We are eager to hear McCain answer questions about each provision. Wait, I know, perhaps he could refer this matter to Carly Fiorina. She should be up to speed on McCain's record since we shared it with her last week. (And, no, she has not sent a thank-you note.) 

Phil Gramm can weigh in, too. I am sure there is enough "straight talk" to go around.  

Related Posts


. . . . .
0 comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <iframe> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <h2> <h3> <h4> <br> <img> <blockquote> <b> <i> <span> <div> <center> <strike> <del>
  • Images can be added to this post.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Glossary terms will be automatically marked with links to their descriptions.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Are you human?
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.