Peru Addresses Indigenous Women's Reproductive Rights
Karim Velasco, RH Reality Check, Latin America on May 22, 2008 - 8:00am
For many years, health policy-makers in Peru have tried in vain to address the subtleties and vagaries of indigenous people's needs. When it comes to women's rights, especially women's reproductive rights, cultural and religious beliefs act as barriers that prevent women from accessing proper healthcare. Maternal and perinatal health programs have not been able to sufficiently increase the number of indigenous women getting prenatal and postnatal care and delivering at health care facilities.
For indigenous women
in the Andean and Amazonian areas of the country, giving birth at health
care facilities in the presence of strangers, without their relatives, half naked and lying in a horizontal position was and still is
just unbearable. Given those circumstances they prefer to stay home
and deliver in a vertical position assisted by a midwife or a relative,
which is what they have traditionally witnessed in their communities. But this trend has had alarming consequences for women's health
and lives because the lack
of medical assistance for any complications that can arise. A UNFPA
representative has pointed out the fact that "several women die when
they deliver at home and nobody gets to know because they live in distant
rural areas...this data is not registered."
Although health personnel
in a few departments have been assisting home deliveries in upright
positions, isolated efforts are not enough. In an attempt to reverse this tendency, the Ministry of Health decided to adapt its policies
to indigenous women's traditions instead of imposing Western ones.
Thus, in August 2005 the "Technical Standard for Vertical Delivery
with Intercultural Adaptation"
was approved by the National Sanitation Strategy for Sexual and Reproductive
Health. It officially introduced the "vertical delivery" as
part of the maternity services in the country with a multicultural and
gender sensitive approach. This policy aims not only to respect indigenous women's customs and beliefs but also to "standardize the medical assistance on vertical delivery...adjusting the health care services offered to women in order to increase institutional delivery and thus, reduce obstetric complications that cause maternal death." The latter is especially disturbing; according to Health Ministry statistics the maternal mortality ratio is estimated to be 185 deaths for every 100,000 live births, mainly because of bleedings.
The National Concerted
Health Plan launched in July
2007 includes as its main goals the decrease of maternal mortality to
66 per 1000,000 live births by 2015, while increasing up to 70% the coverage
of institutional deliveries in rural areas. This is particularly
important considering that the number of deliveries in rural areas has increased from 24% in 2000 to 42.5% in 2004-2005. The Technical Standard for Vertical Delivery emphasizes that above all, it is crucial that health personnel is technically trained to perform the obstetric procedures needed for any of the positions the parturient may adopt: squatting, kneeling, seated or holding rope. The standards also emphasize welcoming the patient and her relatives, explaining to them the procedures in a simple way and, most importantly, encouraging the patients "to express their will with respect to the position they wish to be assisted for delivery." In order to increase the incidence of institutional delivery, Peru has developed "waiting houses" or maternity homes, houses specifically conditioned to "shelter pregnant women and their families coming from remote areas and keep them close to a health care facility with basic obstetric...facilities." This is especially crucial for vulnerable pregnant women such as victims of domestic violence, widows, single or abandoned mothers or the ones with complications. A documentary on the impact of "vertical delivery" as a standard maternity service procedure, produced by the Health Ministry and UNFPA, shows how indigenous women are increasingly trusting the health personnel. All the women interviewed were satisfied with the service and mentioned that they were treated with respect. Some of them even said they were definitely going back to the health care facility for their next delivery and that they would tell other pregnant women to do so. This policy certainly proves that access to health care services for Andean and Amazon women can be improved simply by respecting their traditions and rights and making reproductive health policies more inclusive, that is, bearing in mind the multicultural nature of the country.
2 comments
This is absolutely impressive. Not only that I did not have a clue of how this was being handled but I wouldn't have believed on the possibility of accepting these traditions. "Dealing" with them instead of "changing" them... never thought it could be done. You think "well... it's 2008, considering technology and everything... they just have to adjust". It just shows respect... for people, traditions, cultures, etc.. something that everyone deserves. Thank you for the info. It is ironic though that here in USA women still struggle for the right to give birth in the most natural positions instead of the worst possible--on the back. I had my babies at home 28, 24 and 20 years ago so that I could control the births with no interference. My friends daughter just had a baby and had to have an epidural as it was so painful--they made her lay on her back. whenever I even tried laying down for even a couple minutes I was in extreme pain--being on hands and kness was comfortable for me and my midwife said she would deliver the baby however worked for me! If I had a choice though I would have preferred to be in a birth facility with my midwife and doctors close by (but not in the room unless needed!)But at that time there were none around where I lived. Post new comment |
1Bush Takes Parting Shot at International Family Planning OrganizationsBy Craig Lasher on Jun 27, 2008 - 2:41pm | 0 comments ![]() Beyond Vice and Victimhood: Recognizing the Human Rights of People in Sex WorkBy Meena Seshu on Jun 27, 2008 - 4:00pm | 0 comments ![]() 2States Say 'No Thank You' To Millions in Ab-Only FundsBy William Smith on Jun 27, 2008 - 8:00am | 6 comments ![]() Christian Conservatives Seek to "Restore" WomenBy Kathryn Joyce on Jun 27, 2008 - 8:00am | 1 comment ![]() Coburn, Complicit Dems Threaten Women, Girls, PEPFARBy Scott Swenson on Jun 26, 2008 - 9:35am | 2 comments ![]() 3The Real Story Behind the Teen Pregnancy "Pact"By Karyn Brownson on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 8 comments ![]() When Body Issues Attack, Turn to Feminist TheoryBy Sarah Seltzer on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 4 comments ![]() Women Fighting Manila's Contraceptive Ban Press OnBy Carolina Austria on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() 4Rape in War: Will the United Nations Walk Its Talk?By Marianne Mollmann on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 2 comments ![]() One Love Provides One Stop HIV Info for African-AmericansBy Kim Tolley on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() Freedom's Just Another Word for Punishing WomenBy Amanda Marcotte on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 9 comments ![]() 5Punishing Sex Workers Won't Curb HIV/AIDS, Says Ban-Ki MoonBy Melissa Ditmore on Jun 24, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() What Does Youth Participation in HIV/AIDS Strategy Mean? Collaboration.By Brian Ackerman on Jun 24, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() Today
Discussions
All Time
RH Reality Check Blogroll
|
||||