RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

Purity Ball vs. Hill Visit: Which Is More Effective?

By Emily Goodstein, Spiritual Youth for Reproductive Freedom

January 15, 2008 - 8:31am

Emily Goodstein's picture

Spiritual Youth for Reproductive Freedom activists recently completed 15 successful lobby visits on comprehensive sex education, proving that empowered sex education activists are a lot more effective in changing minds and making policy (and a lot more knowledgeable about sex) than the products of purity balls (a formal event attended by fathers and their daughters. These events promote virginity before marriage for teenaged girls).

The recipients of sex education (young adults) are the best messengers about the fact that they deserve honest information about sex and sexuality. Read on to find out how I spent the day in lobby visits with 25 spiritual young adults from across the country and how this experience topped a slow dance with my Dad.

1) Taste: I imagine the footwear necessary at a purity ball is a white patent leather Mary Jane...or worse...a satin Mary Jane with a stack heel. I opted for an understated black wedge pump. (I associate that distinctive "click clack" sound that my shoes always make in the halls of Hill office buildings with speaking truth to power!)

2) Novelty: The Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC) Spiritual Youth for Reproductive Freedom (SYRF) Regional Training Institute lobby day was the first of its kind and many participants had never lobbied before. Because of the generosity of some of RCRC's funders, we now have a fabulous Public Policy department, complete with policy gurus who conducted a fantastic lobby training for the group before we left.

3) Leadership: A purity ball is often organized and initiated by parents. I do applaud these parents for taking such an active role in their children's lives, although it is disappointing that the purity ball model takes all decision-making ability and empowerment away from daughters and puts them into the hands of fathers. Conversely, the SYRF Institute was all about empowerment! There is often conversation about the future leadership of the reproductive justice movement. Although I despise the term "future leaders" (young activists are leading right now), I can personally attest to the fact that the younger leaders who participated in the training are more than capable of inheriting this movement.

The participants were articulate and passionate. Their organization and drive rivaled even my type-A approach. Their first hand experiences, unique spiritual identities, and vision for justice illustrated that they are empowered leaders (one could argue this is because they weren't asked to sign a contract to preserve their virginity, but rather nourished as leaders and spiritual, sexual beings in a holistic way).

4) Swag: Although both a purity ball and the SYRF Institute feature give-aways, those distributed by SYRF were far more useful (ballpoint pens with our logo on them as opposed to a purity ring).

5) Authenticity: In one visit with a historically anti-choice Congressperson, an Institute participant proclaimed, "We had no sex education in my high school and lots of girls got knocked up." She finished the story and quickly identified herself as a proud Pentecostal Christian from Mississippi which left the Congressperson quiet for a few awkward seconds. I am not sure if there is a more powerful illustration as to what happens when sexuality education is not a priority in schools.

6) Religious Diversity: Training participants lobbied for the REAL act and affirmed Jewish, Muslim, Protestant, Catholic, and other religious values in favor of comprehensive sexuality education. I was lucky to hear a plethora of personal stories about schools, churches, temples, and synagogues with fantastic comprehensive sexuality education curricula (rare at a purity ball, I know) and unfortunately, even more about schools that did not.

At the end of our lobby day, SYRF Institute participants had made 15 Hill visits. In each visit, statistics about sex education and funding were discussed and the story of a spiritual young adult in favor of comprehensive sex education was told. Hill staffers heard a counter to the positions of abstinence-pledge-taking teens marched through their offices.

In my opinion, our lobby day was a significantly more effective way to educate young adults about sex education than a purity ball (of course, lobby visits educate both the Hill staff and the messengers). We had a chance to talk about the life affirming gifts of sex and sexuality, all the while perpetuating our own spiritual identities and values. And nobody wore white patent leather shoes.


. . . . .
9 comments
Congrats on your blog debut! Loved this article - the concept is fabulous - and it sounds like the day was a huge success. (I love the story in point #5, but we know it's true.) So psyched to see such great things from my former intern. Major kudos to you!
Submitted by ladybec on January 15, 2008 - 9:54am.
This is terrific stuff. What a great approach!
Submitted by Mrs. Y on January 15, 2008 - 10:22am.
Emily, Way to get to the point. White patent leather shoes are good for the future of NOBODY! But seriously, your excellent writing and tone really highlight the importance of the work you are doing at SYRF. Where can I send my check? B
Submitted by Brianne on January 15, 2008 - 1:19pm.
Emily, This was so much fun to read. The work you are doing is amazing. You not only helped empower these young activists, but you are building leaders who will go out and teach others.
Submitted by Lauren Bull on January 15, 2008 - 8:53pm.
While navigating the tenuous reproductive rights terrain of our current administration, it is comforting to know that Emily and fellow activists are leading a strong campaign of education, advocacy, and empowerment. Thank you for your personal and professional commitment.
Submitted by JCB on January 16, 2008 - 6:07pm.
Nice work, Goodstein. I look forward to following your long and radiant blogging career. And you're right: SYRF does have exceptionally useful swag.
Submitted by jcsmith on January 21, 2008 - 11:39pm.

In one visit with a historically anti-choice Congressperson, an Institute participant proclaimed, "We had no sex education in my high school and lots of girls got knocked up." She finished the story and quickly identified herself as a proud Pentecostal Christian from Mississippi which left the Congressperson quiet for a few awkward seconds. I am not sure if there is a more powerful illustration as to what happens when sexuality education is not a priority in schools.

Logic isn't your strong suit, is it? The implication of this is that where there is sex education, girls don't get pregnant. Would that it were so.

Submitted by Athanasius on January 22, 2008 - 1:37pm.
that way at all. Sure, some girls will still be gotten pregnant even if they have comphrehensive sex ed. But I feel the numbers will be much lower than in schools where the kids either don't receive sex ed or receive only abstinence-only (often called "ignorance only") sex ed.
Submitted by ruthless on January 23, 2008 - 2:31pm.
But I wonder. The same disconnect in logic occurs earlier in the post: Spiritual Youth for Reproductive Freedom activists recently completed 15 successful lobby visits on comprehensive sex education, proving that empowered sex education activists are a lot more effective in changing minds and making policy (and a lot more knowledgeable about sex) than the products of purity balls (a formal event attended by fathers and their daughters. In fact, the 15 lobbying visits prove nothing. They don't demonstrate that any minds were changed, nor that any policy was made. They certainly bear no relation whatever to the "purity balls" she's so determined to denounce. The writing (and perhaps thinking) here is so sloppy that it makes me wonder if Ms. Goodstein is capable of making a coherent argument, and if not, what good she thinks her lobbying efforts do her cause.
Submitted by Athanasius on January 24, 2008 - 2:19pm.