RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

Let's Really Talk About Sex

Molly Tafoya, Choice USA on January 9, 2008 - 10:02am
Molly Tafoya's picture

I was lucky. "The talk" with my mother was relatively painless. I have a very progressive mother with very informed opinions, and as a single mother she knew what she wanted and didn't want for her daughter. She did her part, but I am of the opinion that it takes a village to raise a child and that my village tried...but fell flat, and the reasons are different than what you might expect.

There are so many ideas about what makes sex education comprehensive. Unfortunately, the current administration has decided that abstinence-only-until-marriage education is the most comprehensive despite the fact that it's the least effective. Luckily, my educators did not feel the same way. My problem with the sex education I received had little to do with content, which was fairly comprehensive, and more to do with the delivery.

The way sex was presented to me was something shameful and embarrassing, more of an awkward chore than an essential component of a young person's education. In the fifth grade, I learned about human sexuality and the fascinating processes of the human body as well as ways to protect myself against STD's by using condoms and abstaining. But it was SO AWKWARD. What I remembered most about that day was my teacher trying to hide her face. She was so painfully embarrassed by the whole situation that she didn't say a word and just put in a video. I learned about sex by a cartoon duck who didn't teach me how to talk about sex, just what sex is. There is so much more to it though. Yes, obviously, it is a physical encounter between people, but when you start thinking about all of the emotional and religious justifications our paternalistic government has come up with to rationalize their abstinence-only agenda which would "protect" our young people (read: our defenseless little girls), there is clearly much more to sex than physical contact. I don't agree with the agenda, but it's pretty clear that sex is complicated.

The sex education that I received in high school was basically the same as in the fifth grade with a few more details and a condom demonstration that was ridiculous. No one took it seriously, and to be perfectly honest, it was about one year too late for many of the girls in my tenth grade class. Was it useless? Absolutely not. I learned what I could and appreciated the fact that I was getting a comprehensive lesson. But looking back, what I remember most was the embarrassment and the angst we all felt, especially our teacher.

Alternatives? Solutions? Yes! Sex needs to be discussed in an environment like the one my mom and I had. Questions were answered and encouraged, not shunned or averted, or answered by cartoon rubber duckies. Young men and women deserve to have meaningful conversations about sex in a learning environment so that they can foster an awareness that sex is something to be taken seriously but, if given the information and the resources, it can be safe and fun. It's the same with other classes. You learn about a subject and then you're expected to make rational conclusions and give an analysis of the situation. Sex is well...sexier, than that sounds but the philosophy is still consistent. It's crucial that young people feel that they can talk about sex, and not in the "Dude, I got lucky last night" way, or the "sexual intercourse involves the sexual organs of two individuals." It needs to be more of a dialogue between educators and us.

I wish I didn't sit there praying the class would end. I wish I would have asked what happens if the condom breaks? How much is birth control? Are there any pills for the boys? Can I get AIDS through kissing? When, exactly, am I fertile? Can I buy condoms if I'm under 18? These questions may seem silly, but they were real for me at 15 years old. I learned the basics about sexual intercourse, but I was ashamed to be asking some very poignant and relevant questions. I had internalized shame and guilt. My education failed me. Sex is not bad! It's not evil and it doesn't have to be dangerous. I didn't ever learn that from that damn cartoon duck.

 

Remember sex-ed in high school? The young people from around the country who’ve submitted their videos to our Fresh Focus: Sex Ed Digital Video Contest do! And they have a lot to say on the subject! From artistically breath-taking to just plain hilarious, these videos tell the individual and collective stories of young people about the sexuality education they’ve had, the sex-ed they wish they’d had or the way they envision sex-ed for the future!

Starting today, each day we’ll feature one or two of the top ten video in a blogpost on our site. All you need to do is VOTE for your top THREE favorites!!


. . . . .
6 comments

Molly, Thank you for bringing light to some of the more pervasive issues surrounding sex education! I really enjoyed your fresh outlook on the issue.

Submitted by Laura L. on January 9, 2008 - 11:42am.

might be to contract sex education out to professional sex educators. You're right in that, quite often, health, science or even PE teachers are the ones who usually end up teaching sex education, and many times they're just not equipped intellectually, psychologically or emotionally to teach young people about sex and reproductive health.


I'd like to see a model whereby young people who've been through a specialized course teach sex ed in middle and high schools. This will put someone who is in the approximate age range as the students in the classroom. This would allow for a better emotional and psychological connection between the instructor and the class, and hopefully, would facilitate a better educational experience for the students. I think they'd be able to relate better to someone of their age cohort (or someone who is just out of that age cohort). And it would keep the "regular" teachers from having to be embarrassed about teaching sex to the students they see every day.


If it doesn't happen before I finish up my graduate degree, it is my personal goal to set up just such an organization.

Submitted by Caitlain on January 9, 2008 - 1:52pm.

That sounds like a fabulous idea! Not only are the creating a better connection and a more comfortable atmosphere for the students to learn and ask questions; but they are reinforcing their knowledge of the information for themselves.

If you ever actually carry this out, I'll be 110% into it.

Submitted by Caitlain on January 9, 2008 - 2:06pm.

I think that the peer group education idea is a sound one and would advocate such a lesson as part of my child's comprehensive sex education. But only part. Molly is right to say that it takes a village: children and young adults should be able to learn reliable information about sex and sexuality in a number of different forums, be it educated peers, parents, books, teachers, and even the internet. I think a real issue here is cultural and goes significantly beyond formal education. The issue is that sex and the body are topics in America (and many, many other cultures) that often do cause embarrasment and shame. This seems remarkably strange considering its a topic that is a regular part of everyday life for most of the population (not just sex, but sexuality). The shame is that the embarrasment over sex is blocking our youth from having information, which must be the most important tool toward self-knowledge/identity and safe/fun sexual practice. While I believe policy about sexual education must change, I'd also be interested to hear about how people think we, as a culture, might change our outlook on sex and our identification with it.

Submitted by John S. on January 9, 2008 - 6:42pm.

I am of an older generation, approximately three generations ago, and was surprised to learn that conversations concerning sex is as painfully embarrassing now as it was then. I agree that the solution lies in education, not only for the student, but for the educator as well, and definitely keep the duck out of it. Attitudes need to change across the board, and young people need to know that no question they have should go unanswered. If a child is old enough to ask the question, they are old enough for the proper answer.

Submitted by Jody R on January 12, 2008 - 3:21pm.

Yes, let's talk about the sex and the safe sex.

accordinh to the CDC, there are over 65 million Americans currently living with an STD, 19 million new STD infections each year, one in three sexually active men and women living with Herpes, and about 50% of all sexually active Americans affected by HPV. One-third of all single and dating Americans now exploring online personal ads (BusinessWeek, 2006) and niche dating has never been hotter. STDromance.com is for those affected by STDs.

Submitted by Nicolexue on January 14, 2008 - 10:43pm.