The Good, The Bad and The Frustrating
Amie Newman, RH Reality Check on December 18, 2007 - 10:03am
Published under: Contraception | STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention | Sexuality Education | Maternal Health | Access to Abortion | International Organizations | Election 2008congress | President Bush | Nita Lowey
One of the major impasses between Congress and the White House this year has been over the bills that fund the government. But it looks like the fighting may soon come to end as lawmakers attempt to pass an omnibus funding bill that President Bush will not veto. On the House side, Appropriations Chair David Obey (D-Wis.) says he's optimistic. Obey has been in the middle of a heated reproductive and sexual health battle for many months related to both the controversial Global Gag Rule (also known as the "Mexico City Policy") for its purpose of restraining any discussion related to abortion from U.S. funded health clinics overseas and the recent increase in federal dollars for failed abstinence-only programs. Unfortunately, passing such a large spending package that wouldn't get vetoed by our illustrious president meant gutting the bill (over the weekend) of language put in place by Democrats who wanted to see either a full repeal of the harmful Global Gag Rule or at least what was termed a "contraceptive exemption." The "contraceptive exemption," introduced by Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY), Chairwoman of the State and Foreign Operations Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, would have allowed for the provision of free contraception to international health agencies that have been denied funding through the Global Gag Rule. The Global Gag Rule, put in place by President Reagan, and lifted temporarily only by President Clinton, restricts free speech and limits health care provision in many developing nations by preventing U.S. aid to family planning agencies that provide crucial health services unless they abide by severe free speech curtailments as set by the U.S. government -free speech limits that would never hold up under the United States Constitution. President Bush's insistence on continuing to bar funding to international NGOs, agencies that are in some way connected to centers that provide or advocate for abortion as an option, has had a tremendous impact on women and their families. According to the Washington Post:
2007 saw a historic moment when both the Senate and House agreed that the global gag rule was harmful to women's health and and included provisions to overturn at least a part of it and get contraceptives to women who wanted them. But President Bush did not value the compromise position – and did not see the value in providing contraception. He threatened a veto early on forcing Democrats and Republicans to agree to his demands. Reproductive health advocates do have something to celebrate. The bill loosens the shackle of the requirement that mandated that at least one-third of US global HIV prevention funds be used solely for programs that promote abstinence until marriage. The mandate is nullified for one year. According to the Global Health Council, the bill increases funding levels for HIV/AIDS efforts globally by almost $1.8 billion for fiscal year 2008. In addition, family planning funds were increased slightly to $461 million, though the global gag rule keeps them from being used in the most effective way possible. This funding level is far below the estimated $1 billion that is the appropriate U.S. contribution to the global total needed to meet unmet need for contraceptives. As Amy Coen, president of Population Action International says,
Related articles:
1 comment
The loss of 1/3 of prevention money for abstinence is indeed a loss for the children affected by HIV/AIDS. The only way this epidemic will ever end is if the next generation changes their behavior, which means Faithfulness in marriage and Abstinence before marriage. We know that especially in an epidemic like Africa, condoms simply are not the best method to curb HIV/AIDS. Look at Uganda and how their rates declined once massive behavior change took root; it wasn't because of condoms, but behavior change. |
1Bush Takes Parting Shot at International Family Planning OrganizationsBy Craig Lasher on Jun 27, 2008 - 2:41pm | 0 comments ![]() Beyond Vice and Victimhood: Recognizing the Human Rights of People in Sex WorkBy Meena Seshu on Jun 27, 2008 - 4:00pm | 1 comment ![]() 2States Say 'No Thank You' To Millions in Ab-Only FundsBy William Smith on Jun 27, 2008 - 8:00am | 6 comments ![]() Christian Conservatives Seek to "Restore" WomenBy Kathryn Joyce on Jun 27, 2008 - 8:00am | 1 comment ![]() Coburn, Complicit Dems Threaten Women, Girls, PEPFARBy Scott Swenson on Jun 26, 2008 - 9:35am | 2 comments ![]() 3The Real Story Behind the Teen Pregnancy "Pact"By Karyn Brownson on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 8 comments ![]() When Body Issues Attack, Turn to Feminist TheoryBy Sarah Seltzer on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 4 comments ![]() Women Fighting Manila's Contraceptive Ban Press OnBy Carolina Austria on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() 4Rape in War: Will the United Nations Walk Its Talk?By Marianne Mollmann on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 2 comments ![]() One Love Provides One Stop HIV Info for African-AmericansBy Kim Tolley on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() Freedom's Just Another Word for Punishing WomenBy Amanda Marcotte on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 9 comments ![]() 5Punishing Sex Workers Won't Curb HIV/AIDS, Says Ban-Ki MoonBy Melissa Ditmore on Jun 24, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() What Does Youth Participation in HIV/AIDS Strategy Mean? Collaboration.By Brian Ackerman on Jun 24, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() Today
All Time
RH Reality Check Blogroll
|
||||