Dems Blow Supreme Court Opportunity in Debate
Scott Swenson, RH Reality Check on November 16, 2007 - 12:22am
Published under: Access to Abortion | Women’s Rights | Election 2008Hillary Clinton | Christoper Dodd | Rudy Giuliani | John Edwards | Mike Huckabee | Duncan Hunter | John McCain | Dennis Kucinich | Ron Paul | Barack Obama | Mitt Romney | Bill Richardson | Tom Tancredo | Fred ThompsonSupreme Court | abortion | debate | Abortion Rights | Las Vegas
At the end of an often tedious debate filled with canned responses tweaked, parsed and refined from the previous tedious debates, the Democratic candidates for President were asked how they would choose a Supreme Court Justice. The question came from an undecided Nevada Democrat, and CNN's Suzanne Malveaux added her own addendum, "would you insist nominees support abortion rights?" Each candidate affirmed in some way they would pick justices that would be fair, understand the experience of the everyday American, protect the marginalized and support the right to privacy enshrined in the United States Constitution. At that point, right before the all important "diamonds or pearls" question, I threw a pillow at the TV screaming, "WHEN ARE YOU ROBOTS GOING TO WAKE UP?" I'm thrilled that each candidate can offer a canned response reassuring voters what they already know, but I'm wondering when the candidates might move beyond the stump speech and help Americans understand what is really at stake with respect to the U.S. Supreme Court. One thing is certain, those opposed to rights Americans currently enjoy understand what's at stake and they rally their base and campaign on it every where they go: "one, two, three more justices" is the Social-Con mantra. But the Democrats can't seem to break out of their programmed responses long enough to fire up their base, or educate independent voters on what really is at stake. Instead, like a quarter in a juke box they hear Supreme Court in the question and think "R-73 ... play pro-choice privacy response." Oh how I long for a candidate with a pulse to say:
Maybe one day the horse race and gotcha politics will give way and some candidate will shed their robotic responses, getting to the heart of what really matters, not just trying to placate special interests. When they do, it might just wake up the half of America that has tuned out of politics.
0 comments
|
1Bush Takes Parting Shot at International Family Planning OrganizationsBy Craig Lasher on Jun 27, 2008 - 2:41pm | 0 comments ![]() Beyond Vice and Victimhood: Recognizing the Human Rights of People in Sex WorkBy Meena Seshu on Jun 27, 2008 - 4:00pm | 1 comment ![]() 2States Say 'No Thank You' To Millions in Ab-Only FundsBy William Smith on Jun 27, 2008 - 8:00am | 6 comments ![]() Christian Conservatives Seek to "Restore" WomenBy Kathryn Joyce on Jun 27, 2008 - 8:00am | 1 comment ![]() Coburn, Complicit Dems Threaten Women, Girls, PEPFARBy Scott Swenson on Jun 26, 2008 - 9:35am | 2 comments ![]() 3The Real Story Behind the Teen Pregnancy "Pact"By Karyn Brownson on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 8 comments ![]() When Body Issues Attack, Turn to Feminist TheoryBy Sarah Seltzer on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 4 comments ![]() Women Fighting Manila's Contraceptive Ban Press OnBy Carolina Austria on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() 4Rape in War: Will the United Nations Walk Its Talk?By Marianne Mollmann on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 2 comments ![]() One Love Provides One Stop HIV Info for African-AmericansBy Kim Tolley on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() Freedom's Just Another Word for Punishing WomenBy Amanda Marcotte on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 9 comments ![]() 5Punishing Sex Workers Won't Curb HIV/AIDS, Says Ban-Ki MoonBy Melissa Ditmore on Jun 24, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() What Does Youth Participation in HIV/AIDS Strategy Mean? Collaboration.By Brian Ackerman on Jun 24, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() Today
All Time
RH Reality Check Blogroll
|
||||