RH Reality Check
Font Size: A |  A |  A

GOP Candidates in Values Voter Debate

Jeff Fecke's picture

The Values Voter Debate Monday night was bypassed by the four leading Republican contenders for president. But the other seven who showed were staunch in their opposition to Planned Parenthood and abortion and strongly in favor of abstinence-based education.

"I want to be the president to appoint the justice that is the final vote we need to overturn Roe v. Wade and end this night of wrong," said Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., expressing a deep antipathy toward abortion that was shared by everyone on stage and many in the crowd.

"Life begins at conception," echoed Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas. Paul called on other candidates to support his "Sanctity of Life Act," that which would strip federal courts of the right to review lawsuits related to reproductive health.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., pledged to appoint only anti-abortion justices to the Supreme Court. "If a judicial candidate can look at a sonogram of an unborn child and not see evidence of a valuable human life, I will not appoint him to the bench," he said.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., agreed with Hunter, saying, "All of us would appoint judges who would overturn Roe v. Wade." He said when it came to appointing judges and justices, "There will be a litmus test."

Businessman John Cox said that, "This issue tears this country apart, and it shouldn't." He said he was staunchly against abortion and called for judges to "only interpret the law."

Ambassador Alan Keyes, who ran unsuccessfully for Senate against Barack Obama in 2004, said he would "issue an executive order...to protect life in the womb." And he called on Republicans to support a right-to-life amendment to the Constitution, saying, "It's simple, it's clear, it must be done."

Gov. Mike Huckabee of Arkansas took a shot at the candidate who did not attend, saying, "It's obvious that all of us on this stage are pro-life. I also think it's obvious why there are four empty podiums here tonight."

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson all declined to attend the debate.

Candidates expressed general opposition to family planning programs. In a "lighning round" of questions, all candidates said they would defund Planned Parenthood and would allow federal funding to go only to organizations that "neither perform nor promote abortion." All candidates also expressed opposition to universal health care and supported a ban on federal funding of school programs that teach that homosexuality is normal.

Candidates also were unanimous in their support of expanding abstinence-based education funding, and all expressed opposition to treaties, such as the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, that "could be used to support abortion as a human right."


. . . . .
6 comments

I watched this debate on Youtube. Ron Paul again set himself apart from the rest, and did so without pandering to the specific group holding the debate. He is the real deal, and is always just himself.

On a different note... Am I the only one who sees the continual skipping of debates by the so called "front runners" a sign that they really aren't concerned with connecting with regular people? The fact that they are too busy chasing down corporate donations to attend these smaller debates should be troubling to everyone.

Submitted by Paul on September 19, 2007 - 11:28am.

I'm a Christian and this Voters Value debate seemed more like a forum about how the candidates would force the audiences views on the populace.
It seems the war mongering Christians in the audience have been blinded and led astray as to what it means to be a Christian - leading by example not force of arms.
Listen to what Ron Paul's responses were. They were brilliant! He represents the correct teachings of Christians by not using the government to impose his beliefs on the general population.

For more insightful articles about Ron Paul:

http://www.ronpaulforpresident2008.com/

Submitted by Karl on September 19, 2007 - 5:38pm.

Unless of course you are part of the female general population, in which case Mr. Paul's legislation would force his views on certain medical procedures, denying women the right to make private health decisions in accordance with their own beliefs, values, circumstances, and most importantly, in the best interest of their health and family.


Be the change you seek,

Scott Swenson, Editor

Submitted by Scott Swenson, RH Reality Check on September 19, 2007 - 6:17pm.

This "debate" was loaded with hardcore religionists and Guiliani and company were wise to steer clear. Huckabee, aka McBlinky, actually thinks that the earth is only 6,000 years old...Brownback too. These men are delusional and Guiliani at least, recognizes this fact. Perhaps Romney too, with his embrace of a different kind of irrational institution of delusions built on a made up concept of Jesus, saw this "values" debate for what it was: a bunch of self-righteous blow-hards not so much debating, as patting eachother on the back for their religious pretensions that always include ways to control, repress, and oppress women. They are the self-appointed (annointed) dictators of behaviour. These guys represent the dumb and dumber of the republican candidacy--with Ron Paul supposedly being the brightest in this box of 30-watt bulbs. Guiliani and co. definitely made the correct choice in not attending this debate amongst the rationally challenged.
Let us hope that the four muskateers who didn't attend use this scenario as a reminder that choice is a fundamental aspect of freedom in everyday life. They had a CHOICE to attend this banal debate or not, just as women ought to have freedom and choice to do what they want with their own bodies and life.
I'd really like to see the dems, indies, greens and repubs--all parties--rally for "free will" (c'mon Rom., remember that sunday school lesson: god grants us all free will) and the freedom to self-govern.
Love and PeAce,
the Isoctatic Infidel

Submitted by Janine Chase-Russell on September 26, 2007 - 2:04pm.

If these seven men running for the republican ticket in this article get their wish of making abortion illegal all I can say is each one of them would obviously make wonderful dads. For every mother forced to deliver a baby that she can not properly raise this means that not only these seven men but ALL people against abortion can raise all of these babies! A perfect solution in my book.

Submitted by Anonymous on September 26, 2007 - 2:35pm.

Your solution is fabulous. I would so love it if men were the ones that got pregnant. I doubt they would like it if they were forced into having a child, wondering if they were going to get child support on top of their pathetic wage if they were lucky enough to even be hired by someone. Let all these guys that shouldn't even be allowed an opinion on abortion raise all these kids.

I cannot say one good thing about being a single mother. It was financial suicide, had no career, no insurance, no retirement. Have a beautiful daughter but my life was ruined. have a college education and nothing to show for it because I was a single mother and discriminated against. No laws protect single mothers.

Submitted by Libby on September 27, 2007 - 8:58am.