Planned Parenthood's Neighbors Concerned
by Jim Spencer, New Journalist Fellow
August 23, 2007 - 7:13am (Print)
Marie Allan sat on the front porch of her apartment and tried to envision anti-abortion protesters walking the sidewalk by the now-empty building across 38th Street.
She didn't like what she imagined.
"We don't need protesters here every day," Allan said fretfully.
Neighbors of a new headquarters for Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains will have no choice. Planned Parenthood's secret purchase of a city block in Northeast Denver is now public knowledge. A large clinic and administrative offices are set to open in August 2008, according to a brochure Planned Parenthood officials have prepared for neighborhood distribution this week.
For Allan and her neighbors, this is not good news.
"I think I might move once they put it there," said Monique, a woman who would only give her first name because of the contentiousness of the abortion debate.
Monique opposes the abortion services Planned Parenthood offers. But like Allan, she's equally upset with the prospect of protesters harassing patients entering the clinic and turning her street into a spectacle.
And like most people - including those who oppose abortion - Monique doesn't consider the new Planned Parenthood clinic "a death camp" or a place that "kills babies for profit," as a spokesperson for Colorado Right to Life described it.
"I've gone to Planned Parenthood," Monique said, standing in the doorway of her apartment 200 feet from what will be the new headquarters building. "I've done birth control. When I hear Planned Parenthood, I don't think ‘death camp.' They offer a lot of services to low-income people. If money goes to keeping people from having babies they can't take care of, that's a good thing."
Monique was talking about birth control that reduces the need for abortions.
Family planning, counseling and distribution of birth control makes up 94 percent of services rendered in the five-state area administered by Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, said Leslie Durgin, senior vice president for community development.
"Six percent of our service is abortion," Durgin said.
Those abortions are legal, and they are safer than the illegal abortions that would result if groups like Colorado Right to Life succeed in their ultimate goal - taking away women's individual reproductive rights.
Calling Planned Parenthood clinics death camps or for-profit baby killing factories is the kind of inflammatory talk that led Planned Parenthood of the Rockies to buy its new property without telling anyone.
Planned Parenthood branches in Austin, Texas and Alton, Illinois tried the stealth-purchase strategy for new clinics, Durgin said. In Portland, Oregon, Planned Parenthood bought city property for a new clinic. So the process was public from the beginning.
In Denver, said Durgin, Planned Parenthood made a quiet purchase, but then decided to go public with its plans when asked by a reporter.
"We've been a good neighbor for 90 years," Durgin said.
Allan, Monique and others living in the townhouse apartments facing the new clinic wonder how good Planned Parenthood will be for their neighborhood. At the same time, they blame protesters as much as anyone for the disruptions that are likely to occur.
Over-the-top rhetoric has led to threats and attempts to intimidate Planned Parenthood's local staff. In other parts of the country, such hate-speak has inspired killings of clinic workers. Think Eric Rudolph.
Allan has friends who lived near Planned Parenthood of the Rockies' current clinic near 20th Avenue and Vine Street. She's heard the stories of pictures of bloody fetuses hoisted by protesters. It's not something kids going to play at nearby Martin Luther King Park need to be confronted with constantly, she said.
But with proper zoning in place and with permits in the works, Planned Parenthood is coming. The former red brick United Airlines office between Poplar and Pontiac on 38th Street will be renovated and expanded. The Planned Parenthood brochure shows an artist's concept of a campus-like setting, beautifully landscaped and buffered by trees.
Conspicuously missing from the picture are the fence that will surround the property and, of course, anti-abortion activists who have the right to stand on publicly owned sidewalks.
"We have very few neighbors," Durgin said "We bought a whole city block to provide privacy and security."
The new clinic and administrative site is surrounded on three sides by railroad tracks, a parking lot and storage units and the back of a hotel. Planned Parenthood placed the clinic's main entrance on a side of the building that faces the rear of the Renaissance Hotel at 38th and Quebec.
Among the lies anti-abortion activists like to tell is that Planned Parenthood targets minority women for abortions. That has already happened in Denver, where the location of the new clinic in a predominantly black neighborhood led to suggestions of racism.
Durgin said only 7 percent of the women who receive abortions at Planned Parenthood are African-American.
Allan, who is black, isn't buying the racism charge.
She has seen the impact of unwanted and neglected children of any color on the entire community.
"We're paying for babies people can't afford," she said.
There are also circumstances where Allan would consider an abortion.
"I'm not going to have a baby if I get raped," she said.
Seated beside her, a friend who would identify himself only as Marshall E. told the story of his long-time girlfriend. "When she was young, she got pregnant by a friend who used drugs," he said. "She had an abortion because she knew she couldn't afford to have a baby."
That was, as it should always be, her choice to make. Thing is, if she'd gone to Planned Parenthood in the first place she might not have had to make the decision.
That's the point the folks talking about death camps and protesting outside Planned Parenthood seem to miss.
The organization's main mission has never been to give women abortions. It has always been to keep women from getting pregnant until they feel ready to give birth.
"The organization's main mission has never been to give women abortions."
Wow. PP got a little off track didn't they? The nation's #1 abortion provider, founded by a eugenicist, is now trying to clean up their image? I don't think it will work PP. Too much blood on your hands.
Yes, Margaret Sanger and some of planned parenthoods founders were eugenicists. SO WHAT! They are dead. The world is ruled by the living, not the dead hand. Those who run planned parenthood today are not the same persons. Planned Parenthood has always had one core message. That each person has the right to decide for himself/herself when she will become a parent and how many children she will have. I do not understand what is so evil about this concept. Would someone please tell me? On the other hand, the right to lifers do not hesitate to use coercive tactics to force couples into having children they do not want. I wonder which is better in a constituional democracy? Someone please tell me.
So, "Prolifedude", I think you let your anti-abortion ferver interfere with logic. Only 6% of Planned Parenthood's business is made up of abortions. So, even if Planned Parenthood is the nation's #1 abortion provider, they are still not mainly doing abortions. Hence, they live up to their statement that their "main mission has never been to give women abortions". I went as a sexually active teen, and never had an abortion. I believe that 94% of what they do has nothing to do with abortion. They're not trying to clean up their image. They don't believe what they're doing is wrong, and nor do I. I am guessing that your opinion has been shaped by your religious leaders interpretation of the bible. I have lots of things to say and hope you will give them consideration. My husband was raised Catholic, and the church's stance is very anti-abortion. My husband does not agree with that. When asked why, he would tell you that it comes from reading the bible and not putting it into context. He says that the bible tells of prostitutes that use abortion as birth control. He says that abortion under those circumstances is negative and thus is not supported. Now you could interpret this narrowly and say that the bible says abortion is wrong. Or you could say that the bible is saying that abortion is wrong under certain circumstances. I suppose it depends on whether you believe that Jesus would want us to decide what is healthiest for ourselves based on our conscience and our own lives. You cannot make that decision for all women, prolifedude. I knew when I was a teenager that if planned parenthood was unable to perform an abortion, I would pursue one illegally if necessary. I particularly resent the fact that you are male, and will never know the responsibility of carrying an unwanted child, and yet feel you can force that on everyone. I find it ironic, that anti-abortion people like you talk about "blood on their hands". It will be blood on your hands when more unintentional deaths occur from illegal abortions. Do you really think you can stop people's sex drive? The answer is no. Do you think people who are intent on having an abortion will stop even if it is illegal? The answer is no. Do you really think a four week old fetus is that different from a woman's period? It isn't. In fact, women often miscarry, and if it's early, they often won't even know they were pregnant. However, being forced to carry an unintended pregnancy would be like being emotionally raped. Whether the child was adopted, whatever. Additionally, the argument that the fetus is a human being just like you or me, is a matter of opinion. Therefore, we know we are doing major psychological damage to the mother, to force a pregnancy. However, since the fetus is inside the mother, and cannot speak or hear or do anything at all without the mother, how much of a viable human being is this?! In nature we see what happens all the time. Many life forms spontaneously abort under stress or lacking the ability to support their young.
I'm not saying that we are not more advanced and grieve over the loss of a pregnancy, but it is not the same as the loss of an actual child, or the endless responsibility of having children.
So what are you going to do? You are never going to change my mind, or many other people's point of view. This is a free country. It is the beauty of it. As much as I wouldn't, you can wait until marriage to have sex, you can have lots of children, and never ever will your wife have an abortion, even if necessary to save your beloved wife. However, you should respect that I get to make decisions regarding my life for myself. You cannot force your religious point of view on everyone or this country will not really support freedom. Please share this with your friends, as it is time to start a dialog about freedom in this country, and continuing to allow people to make these hard choices for themselves.
