Life Without Contraception
Andrea Lynch, RH Reality Check on September 28, 2006 - 8:10am
Published under: Contraception | Women’s Rights | International OrganizationsCampaign 2006 | CINTA | War on Contraception
Last week, while American anti-contraception activists gathered in Chicago to discuss how contraception (a.k.a. the "taproot" of abortion) is destroying America, a group of African health ministers and other African Union leaders met in Maputo, Mozambique to discuss how ensuring women's access to contraception and related sexual and reproductive health services might help Save Africa. Apparently, the African Union has not gotten the memo about how contraception is NOT the answer. But, in the great tradition of the Pro-Life Action League, it's time to take a closer look... My colleagues at RH Reality Check have provided ample background on and coverage of Chicago's Contraception is Not the Answer, but here's a quick history lesson, according to the conference website: everything was fine until the mid-twentieth century. Then, the industrialized world "embraced contraception as the way to eradicate poverty, lower the birth rate and guarantee freedom for women." Sadly, contraception didn't do any of those things. Instead, it caused "widespread promiscuity, divorce, sexually transmitted diseases, single parent households and abortion." Now, according to the conference organizers, "It's time to take a closer look." We must face the fact that "Contraception has succeeded in separating marital intimacy from procreation and turning sex into a recreational activity rather than an expression of love and commitment." I guess it follows, then, that in societies where access to contraception and abortion is scarce, marital intimacy is always linked to procreation and sex is always an expression of love and commitment. And given the conference's emphasis on the supposed health risks associated with contraception and abortion, I think we can also safely assume that a contraception- and abortion-free society would naturally enjoy a high standard of reproductive health. It's funny, because according to the health ministers who gathered in Maputo last week, despite scarce access to sexual and reproductive health services (including contraception and safe abortion), Africa is NOT in fact the reproductive health capital of the world, and sex is NOT always an expression of love and commitment. Check out these statistics, courtesy of Inter Press Service, the WHO, research compiled by the AMANITARE Initiative, and the African newsletter Pambazuka News:
Obviously, increasing access to contraception alone won't make these women's sexual and reproductive rights a reality--but, as the participants at the Maputo conference concluded, it's a start. And before the Contraception Is Not The Answer organizers wax nostalgic about the days when women in industrialized countries lacked access to contraception, maybe they should take a closer look at African women's lives.
3 comments
The simple, basic facts about contraception are these: 1) They encourage people to act as though pregnancy were impossible, BUT 2) pregnancies still happen, no matter what contraceptive methods are used. We have, by one report, 3 million unintended pregnancies in the US every year. A huge portion of these are due to contraceptive failure. Numbers from the Alan Guttmacher Institute indicate that roughly half of the women seeking abortion are there because of self-reported contraceptive failure. Hi Vince,
If you’d like to try and establish some sort of direct causal relationship between contraceptive availability and unintended pregnancies, go right ahead, but realize that you’re not making any sense, since unintended pregnancies (and abortion, for that matter) predate modern contraception by thousands of years. Blaming unintended pregnancies on contraception is like blaming car accidents on seatbelts (since they encourage reckless driving, of course). Furthermore, do you honestly think that if we make contraception illegal, unintended pregnancies and abortions will go away? If so, then I’m afraid we may be working from different definitions of reality.
As for your quality of life argument, speak for yourself. I use contraception and I have a great life. And on the topic of respect, the times I’ve felt most disrespected by men in bed have been when they’ve resisted contraceptive use. In fact, as a woman who’s not ready to be a mother yet, my personal policy has always been that if men refuse to use contraception, I refuse to sleep with them. No problems so far. However, if *you* don’t want to use contraception, that’s fine (though I assume you wouldn’t make the decision unilaterally on your partner’s behalf). That’s the beauty of living in a plural democracy where contraception is legal—I can use it, you don’t have to use it, and everyone else can decide for themselves. If contraception were mandatory in the United States, it would be one thing. However, contraception isn't mandatory—in fact, women often have to fight to get it covered under their health insurance plans, and funding for contraception through Title X and Medicaid has been dwindling for years. But I probably don't have to tell you that, since you're already an expert on what women want.
Andrea Lynch Thanks, Andrea - good food for thought Somehow it has come as a big surprise to us that contraception has changed people's sexual behavior. The biggest, most striking changes came in the sixties, but it was coming in more slowly for decades before that. Then the sixties hit and US family structure and family life haven't been the same since. Few would argue that there have been overall improvements. To argue that position, you have to suggest that maybe divorce is an advantage, or that single parent families work better than two parent families. I have seen arguments for both of these, but our lived experience with divorce and single parent families tells us different. BTW and on a tangent. I would strongly prefer not to make contraceptives illegal. If people can't make an informed decision in a matter like this, legislation (as I see it) would just create another dimension to the black market. Egads! Prohibition all over again. |
1Bush Takes Parting Shot at International Family Planning OrganizationsBy Craig Lasher on Jun 27, 2008 - 2:41pm | 0 comments ![]() Beyond Vice and Victimhood: Recognizing the Human Rights of People in Sex WorkBy Meena Seshu on Jun 27, 2008 - 4:00pm | 1 comment ![]() 2States Say 'No Thank You' To Millions in Ab-Only FundsBy William Smith on Jun 27, 2008 - 8:00am | 6 comments ![]() Christian Conservatives Seek to "Restore" WomenBy Kathryn Joyce on Jun 27, 2008 - 8:00am | 1 comment ![]() Coburn, Complicit Dems Threaten Women, Girls, PEPFARBy Scott Swenson on Jun 26, 2008 - 9:35am | 2 comments ![]() 3The Real Story Behind the Teen Pregnancy "Pact"By Karyn Brownson on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 8 comments ![]() When Body Issues Attack, Turn to Feminist TheoryBy Sarah Seltzer on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 4 comments ![]() Women Fighting Manila's Contraceptive Ban Press OnBy Carolina Austria on Jun 26, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() 4Rape in War: Will the United Nations Walk Its Talk?By Marianne Mollmann on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 2 comments ![]() One Love Provides One Stop HIV Info for African-AmericansBy Kim Tolley on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() Freedom's Just Another Word for Punishing WomenBy Amanda Marcotte on Jun 25, 2008 - 8:00am | 9 comments ![]() 5Punishing Sex Workers Won't Curb HIV/AIDS, Says Ban-Ki MoonBy Melissa Ditmore on Jun 24, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() What Does Youth Participation in HIV/AIDS Strategy Mean? Collaboration.By Brian Ackerman on Jun 24, 2008 - 8:00am | 0 comments ![]() Today
All Time
RH Reality Check Blogroll
|
||||