<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Katrina Anderson's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/katrina-anderson"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/1916/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/1916/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-11-02T15:04:00-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Abortion Providers = Women&#039;s Rights Defenders</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/10/28/recognizing-abortion-providers-as-womens-rights-defenders" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/10/28/recognizing-abortion-providers-as-womens-rights-defenders</id>
    <published>2008-10-31T09:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-02T15:04:00-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Katrina Anderson</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Leading Voices" />
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="abortion care" />
    <category term="abortion providers" />
    <category term="anti-choice violence" />
    <category term="clinic access" />
    <category term="clinic violence" />
    <category term="human rights" />
    <category term="Inter-American Commission on Human Rights" />
    <category term="women&#039;s health care" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Abortion providers have been threatened, attacked, and even murdered by anti-choice extremists. If the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights recognizes them as women's rights defenders, would providers be better protected?    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
Since 
the Supreme Court's decision in <em>Roe v. Wade</em> in 1973, abortion 
opponents have used numerous strategies to undermine women's constitutional 
right to abortion and prevent women's access to abortion.  One 
persistent approach has been targeting reproductive healthcare professionals 
in order to make it impossible for them to provide abortion services.  
Abortion providers have been threatened, attacked, and even murdered 
by anti-choice extremists; stigmatized and professionally ostracized 
by their medical colleagues; harassed by public officials hostile to 
abortion rights; and over-regulated by legislators who believe abortion 
should be treated differently than comparable medical procedures.  
In the face of these threats and pressures, heroic women and men committed 
to women's health and rights continue to provide services, often at 
great personal, professional, and financial cost.   Yet, these 
tactics have had their toll.  Fewer and fewer reproductive healthcare 
professionals are willing or able to provide abortion services in the 
United States. Currently, there are 37% fewer providers than there were 
in 1982 which has greatly diminished women's ability to obtain abortion 
services.
</p>
<p>
On 
Tuesday, October 28, in Washington, D.C., the Center for Reproductive 
Rights and three other human rights organizations appeared before the 
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights at a hearing to discuss women's 
rights defenders across the hemisphere.  The Commission is a key 
human rights body that works to hold states across the Americas accountable 
to their human rights obligations.  Over the past several years, 
it has emphasized the important role women's rights defenders play 
in the realization of human rights and the special risks and vulnerabilities 
they face.  Some women's rights defenders are targeted because 
of their gender, making them more vulnerable to certain types of attacks 
such as sexual violence.  Others, like Jen Boulanger, the executive 
director of Allentown's Women's Center, in Allentown, Pennsylvania, 
are targeted for the work they do in defending women's rights, such 
as advocating for and providing reproductive healthcare services.
</p>
<p>
Jen 
submitted testimony about the constant targeting of the Allentown Women's 
Center and its employees by the anti-abortion movement.  Women's 
rights defenders from Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Jamaica, 
México, Nicaragua, and Perú also testified about the risks they face 
in their work, promoting women's sexual and reproductive rights, protecting 
women from violence, and fighting discrimination on the grounds of sexual 
orientation and gender identity.  Testimony and documentation presented 
at the hearing demonstrated how women's rights defenders throughout 
the hemisphere have faced similar kinds of violations, including attacks 
on their personal safety, threats against their families, smear campaigns, 
and government restrictions on their work.   <br />
</p>
<p>
Each 
testimony looked at the need for governments to recognize the importance 
of women's rights defenders in upholding fundamental human rights 
such as dignity, liberty, and equality.  To that end, they urged 
the Commission to encourage governments to adopt and enforce strong 
measures to improve their safety and to eliminate policies and laws 
that impede their work.  As Jen Boulanger explained in her written 
testimony, &quot;Currently there are no attempts to prevent violence at 
our clinic.  Police are called at least once per week to maintain 
order, but there is no deterrent for unlawful behavior--no punishment, 
no legal action.&quot; When Jen turned to the city for help in resolving 
ongoing threats, public officials refused to help.  Their explanation?  
If the clinic chooses to offer abortion services, providers should expect 
to face threats and intimidation from anti-abortion extremists--in 
other words, it comes with the territory.  One solution Jen proposed 
is to re-activate the national task force for clinic violence prevention 
established under U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno but long dormant 
under the Bush administration.  The task force would greatly improve 
coordination of law enforcement at the federal and local levels, providing 
local police the tools and funding they need to effectively prevent 
violence.  Her recommendation mirrored those of other defenders 
who called for an end to impunity for violations against women's rights 
defenders.  For example, Colombian defenders asked the Commission 
to pressure Colombia to investigate and punish those who attack women 
trade unionists, and transgender rights activists in Costa Rica sought 
accountability for consistent discrimination and violence they endure 
from law enforcement.
</p>
<p>
Jen 
and the other human rights activists know that going to the Commission 
is only the first step in raising awareness about the important role 
of women's rights defenders in building the larger culture of human 
rights.  But unless defenders are safe and able to do their jobs, 
women will continue to be denied their basic human rights, including 
their rights to equality, to be free from violence and to access reproductive 
health care including abortion. Working collaboratively with the United 
Nations Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders, the Commission 
has worked successfully to monitor trends of violations against human 
rights defenders and make appropriate recommendations to states on how 
to improve their systems of rights protection.  By following these 
international recommendations about how best to defend the defenders 
of human rights, the U.S. can send a strong statement about its commitment 
to ensuring reproductive rights as fundamental human rights.  Providers 
of women's reproductive rights in the United States deserve not only 
our gratitude and respect but also a legal framework that protects their 
security and allows them to do their jobs.  The first step is to 
recognize them as women's rights defenders.
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
