<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Marcia Greenberger's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/marcia-greenberger"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/1779/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/1779/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-09-11T12:38:51-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>What&#039;s at Stake for Women in Health Care Reform</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/04/16/whats-stake-women-health-care-reform" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/04/16/whats-stake-women-health-care-reform</id>
    <published>2009-04-17T13:00:00-04:00</published>
    <updated>2009-04-17T14:36:25-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marcia Greenberger</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Leading Voices" />
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="caregivers" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="health insurance" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[To meet women's needs, health care reform must result in affordable coverage - it must include income based subsidies for health care premiums; elimination of caps on services and prescriptions; and a strengthened Medicaid program.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
Audra, a 59-year-old African American woman living in Northeast DC,
opted for an early retirement package from her employer two years ago
so that she could become a full time caregiver to her ailing father.
She imagined that she'd be able to find a new job before her package
and health insurance ran out. But, like a growing number of Americans
in our current economy, Audra has been unable to find work ever since. 
</p>
<p>
This January, Audra officially joined the ranks of the 17 million
uninsured women across the nation. On a dwindling income and without
health insurance, it became much more difficult to manage her chronic
conditions--diabetes and hypertension--which require regular medication
and a strict diet. &quot;I was at the point where I was compromising with
the food, and compromising with the medicine,&quot; Audra said. &quot;I stopped
taking my blood sugar in the morning because I knew that I couldn't do
anything to make it better.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Audra's plight demonstrates how much these tough economic times have
exacerbated the already severe problems that more and more people face
in our current health system. A new U.S. Labor Department unemployment
report shows that 663,000 more Americans lost their jobs in
March--raising the nation's unemployment rate to a 26-year high of 8.5
percent. For many who have lost their jobs, they've also lost their
employer-sponsored health insurance benefits. 
</p>
<p>
The recently-unemployed may be able to extend their health benefits
through COBRA coverage, which allows laid-off workers to retain their
employer-based insurance if those laid-off workers pay the full cost of
that coverage. But this option is generally unaffordable. According to
the consumer health organization Families USA, the average national
premium costs for family COBRA coverage consume almost 84 percent of
average unemployment benefits. And as health care costs climb through
the roof, growing numbers of people simply can't afford coverage or
health care.
</p>
<p>
In most states, insurers in the individual health insurance market
(where people buy coverage directly from insurance companies) are
allowed to set and raise premiums based on health status, gender, and
age, refuse to cover benefits related to a pre-existing condition, or
deny coverage altogether to individuals with pre-existing conditions,
like Audra's hypertension and diabetes.
</p>
<p>
In our broken health care system, nearly one in five women is
uninsured. Even for those who have health insurance, women are more
likely than men to have health coverage that has too many gaps,
including large co-pays, life-time limits, and exclusions or
limitations in needed services like mental health care or prescription
drugs. Since women, on average, have lower incomes than men, they are
at particular risk of financial barriers to care; one in four women
says that she is unable to pay her medical bills, and women are more
likely than men to delay or go without needed health care because of
cost. 
</p>
<p>
Every woman in this country should have a guarantee of high quality,
affordable coverage. Audra's story demonstrates not only why we need
comprehensive reform, but some of the solutions needed.
</p>
<p>
Health care reform that results in accessible care for women means
making sure that everyone has access to affordable coverage and health
care, and ending unfair insurance practices - such as rejecting
applicants based on health history, pre-existing condition exclusions,
or setting insurance rates based on gender, health status, or age. It
also means providing access to affordable health coverage regardless of
employment or family status. 
</p>
<p>
To meet the needs of women, health care reform must result in
coverage that is affordable--meaning that it must include income based
subsidies for health care premiums and all out-of-pocket expenses;
elimination of annual or lifetime caps on services and prescriptions;
and a strengthened and expanded Medicaid program.
</p>
<p>
Finally, reform must provide comprehensive health and prescription
drug benefits with coverage for a full range of health services,
including wellness, prevention, and reproductive health services. 
</p>
<p>
Policy makers are finally listening to the majority of Americans who
are no longer willing or able to wait for reform of our broken health
care system. President Obama and key leaders of Congress have taken
concrete steps towards this objective and, in last night's speech at
Georgetown University, the President again affirmed his commitment to
&quot;get health care reform done this year.&quot; On Monday, Congress returns
from their recess and will continue putting together a health reform
proposal. 
</p>
<p>
Opponents of reform are already mobilizing to defeat these efforts,
drawing lines in the sand and using the same old scare tactics. But
failure cannot be an option--we have too much at stake. The cost of
health care is among the top economic concerns of women and their
families, and fixing our health care system is key to fixing our
economy and providing peace of mind for hard-working Americans.<b></b>
</p>
<p>
<b>So, what happened to Audra?</b>
</p>
<p>
Within a month of losing her coverage, Audra was almost completely out
of medicine. A friend at her church then told Audra about Bread for the
City, a DC non-profit that provides free food, clothing, legal,
medical, and social services to low-income District residents.
Community-based health providers like Bread for the City form a
critical safety net, organizing and delivering a significant level of
health care and other related services to the uninsured, Medicaid
beneficiaries, and other vulnerable patients. 
</p>
<p>
Audra was fortunate enough to get an appointment, where she received
free medical services, including her medication, and a monthly supply
of groceries to help her manage her diet. She was then enrolled in DC
HealthCare Alliance, a program that provides a range of healthcare
services to uninsured individuals and families with incomes up to 200%
of the federal poverty line, or $21,660 for a single person in 2009.
</p>
<p>
Audra found a temporary solution to the challenges she faced as a
single, uninsured low-income woman, and is fortunate to live in a
jurisdiction where she qualifies for a publicly-sponsored insurance
program. But for too many women in America, this help isn't available -
they lack access to even temporary solutions, and they go without the
care they need. And Audra can't count on this help lasting for as long
as she needs it.
</p>
<p>
Audra, along with millions of Americans, simply can't afford to wait
for meaningful reform that will bring a guarantee of quality,
affordable comprehensive health care for us all.
</p>
<blockquote>
	<p>
	This post first appeared on the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcia-d-greenberger/whats-at-stake-for-women_b_187778.html">Huffington Post</a>. 
	</p>
</blockquote>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Talking Health Care at the White House</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/03/06/talking-health-care-white-house" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/03/06/talking-health-care-white-house</id>
    <published>2009-03-06T11:42:53-05:00</published>
    <updated>2009-03-06T12:15:41-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marcia Greenberger</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Leading Voices" />
    <category term="Access to Abortion" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Maternal Health" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="health care" />
    <category term="health care reform" />
    <category term="women&#039;s health" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[While it would be foolhardy to think that all differences on health care reform will magically disappear, the tone at the White House Health Care Summit was constructive and the mood hopeful.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
At 12:30 yesterday afternoon, I joined a line of people that had formed by the White House
gate, eager to enter and begin the critically important task of debating and
advancing the effort to achieve health care reform this year. A beautiful, warm
day, the talk was of the thaw in Washington
-- and not only regarding the weather. I had the chance to talk with leaders on
health care reform in the House and the Senate, from both parties and with
varying positions and approaches, and to press them and the many others who
were there to address the needs of women and their families. There were close
allies of the National Women's Law
Center sitting next to
those with whom we do not often agree, trading ideas and business cards.
</p>
<p>
While it
would be foolhardy to think that all differences will magically disappear, the
tone was constructive (dare I say even friendly), the mood hopeful and the
setting a powerful reminder that the public good must prevail. What was
striking was that a positive tone existed, not only in front of the cameras but
in private conversations throughout the day. Wanting to read it tonight, one
Republican member of the House asked me for my own copy of <a href="http://action.nwlc.org/site/PageServer?pagename=nowheretoturn" target="_blank">the Center's report</a> on the outrageous practice of many
insurance companies to charge women more than men when they buy insurance
directly -- even with maternity coverage excluded! This
&quot;gender-rating&quot; practice underscores how unfair and arbitrary the
system can be, and the extra hurdles that women have to overcome.
</p>
<p>
I would
not underestimate for a minute the monumental effort it will take to get <a href="http://www.nwlc.org/reformmatters/" target="_blank">health care reform </a>that
really is affordable, accessible and comprehensive. Nor would I discount how
hard it will be, even with the extraordinary leadership of President Obama and
with Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid in support of his approach. But I
left at the end of the day inspired, determined and truly believing that this
really is the time -- and that women have a special obligation to speak up and
make sure that we do succeed. That obligation means ensuring that women's own
health needs, including reproductive health needs, are met, that the families
they care for get the care they need, and that, as the majority of health care
providers in this country, their patients' concerns are protected.
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Time to Say No to Abstinence-Only</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/09/08/time-say-no-abstinenceonly" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/09/08/time-say-no-abstinenceonly</id>
    <published>2008-09-10T08:00:54-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-09-11T12:38:51-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Marcia Greenberger</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Leading Voices" />
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="abstinence-only" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Teen pregnancy is a crucial public health issue -- but the federal government refuses to address it with anything more effective than failed abstinence-only programs.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
Last
week, the announcement that Governor Palin's daughter is pregnant reignited
a national conversation about teenage pregnancy that was first sparked earlier in the
year by Jamie Lynn Spears and the film Juno. 
</p>
<p>
The issue of teen pregnancy deserves more than
fleeting tabloid coverage.  It needs sustained
attention and action. <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_ATSRH.html" target="_blank">Each
year</a>, 750,000 adolescents in the U.S. become pregnant - far more than in most other industrialized nations - and 82 percent of such pregnancies are unintended. In addition to potential risks to the <a href="http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/why-it-matters/pdf/health.pdf" target="_blank">health</a>
of both the mother and her child, pregnancy at a young age can severely limit a
young woman's ability to complete her <a href="http://www.nwlc.org/dropout/" target="_blank">education</a> - and subsequently to
find a well-paying job. 
</p>
<p>
Yet,
rather than addressing this critical public health issue through comprehensive
and medically accurate sex education which includes information on abstinence
and contraception, the federal government has spent more than $1.5 billion on
abstinence-only programs that have failed our teens. 
</p>
<p>
Federally
funded abstinence-only programs are expressly prohibited from providing any
information to adolescents about the proper use of contraceptives, or their
proven efficacy in preventing unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted
infections (STIs) - only their failure rates can be discussed. On top of
slanting the information, studies have documented that over <a href="http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20041201102153-50247.pdf" target="_blank">80 percent</a>
of abstinence-only curricula actually provide medically inaccurate and
misleading information about contraception and other reproductive health care
- including grossly exaggerated failure rates for condoms and false information
about the risks of abortion.
</p>
<p>
Considering
how far women candidates have come in the 2008 election season, it is
especially galling that some of these curricula teach that girls care less than
boys about achievement and their futures. For example, <em><em>Why kNOw</em></em> (2002), a curriculum used by
seven federally-funded abstinence-only programs, teaches: &quot;women gauge
their happiness and judge their success by their relationships. Men's
happiness and success hinge on their accomplishments.&quot; 
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/abstinencereport.asp" target="_blank">Study</a> after <a href="http://www.thenationalcampaign.org/EA2007/EA2007_sum.pdf" target="_blank">study</a>
demonstrate that abstinence-only programs don't work, and the public
agrees. According to a <a href="http://www.nwlc.org/pdf/2008poll_whatwomenwantmemo.pdf" target="_blank">recent poll</a>
conducted by Peter D. Hart Research Associates, two-thirds (64%) of women
voters say that it is extremely or very important for Congress and the next
administration to address policies that will help prevent unintended
pregnancies by expanding access to contraceptives and comprehensive sex
education.
</p>
<p>
Rather
than continuing to fund ineffective, inaccurate, and dangerous abstinence-only
programs, we should invest in comprehensive sex education programs that help
teens meet the challenges they face. Young people - particularly young
women - need and deserve comprehensive information that is accurate and
unbiased to prevent unintended pregnancies and STIs, and to make responsible
decisions for their health and their lives. 
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
