So what is the reason for this lack of attendance by African and African American youth?

From what I can discern, there may be a couple of contributing factors.  After scouring through different websites, I could only come across a handful of embassies in different African countries, which may have made it difficult for people to apply for visas. This could  imply that only those really determined youth could attend since they may have had to leave home to travel to the nearest country with a Mexican embassy to obtain a visa, thus incurring additional costs for small African organizations that are already financially constrained. 

Another obstacle that young Africans could be the fact that Mexico City directly borders the US.  Mexico City is a common stop for many, including young African, refugees trying to enter the US illegally. But even if some were lucky enough to be able to access a Mexican embassy, they may have been turned away more quickly than others due to the perception that they might try to use attendance at the conference as a way to enter the US. 

So African presence here is seriously lacking -- right down to the African regional networking zone in the global village. There are more white people here speaking on behalf of young Africans than Africans themselves.  This isn't to say that there aren't great non-African organizations doing amazing work in Africa -- but if anything, the reasons behind the low representation of African youth highlights yet again the fact that AIDS is not an issue that can be solved in isolation. All social, political, and developmental factors need to be taken into consideration in halting its spread.  Whether we're trying to fight the epidemic through prevention, treatment, or international advocacy at global conferences, it is necessary that all of these factors be taken into account.

Also absent from the conference are African Americans. Considering the lack of attention politicians and organizations have toward the HIV/AIDS epidemic among African Americans in the United States, their absence at this global conference can only be called tragic.

During his speech, former President Clinton said "if African-Americans in the US were their own country, their prevalence rate would rank 7th internationally." So my questions are plentiful: Why is the US government spending more on international AIDS funding on countries with lower HIV prevalence rates than that of the African -American population in the US? Are African Americans not a part of the epidemic? This is a group that is being systematically neglected by the US government in all respects, especially when it comes to HIV. Yet, I only remember seeing one African-American AIDS organization in the global village.  While I fully support US funding directed at stopping HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa, clearly more resources also need to be channeled to support HIV and AIDS programs for the African American community domestically.

A lot of people spent a lot of time, energy and most importantly, money, to organize and prepare for this conference, and those are the ones who are most evident and prominent when I walk around the global village. The conference is teaching me a great deal about the epidemic in other parts of the world. Nevertheless, whether it is minority groups like young Africans and African-Americans, who are continuously under-funded and sometimes neglected altogether by their governments, or people from other regions who face developmental and political obstacles -- I must remember that it is the voices that I'm not hearing that I should be paying the most attention to.