<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Cara DeGette's blog</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/cara-degette"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/1280/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/1280/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-02-11T08:59:19-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Massive Layoffs at Focus on the Family After Prop 8 Win</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/18/massive-layoffs-focus-family-after-prop-8-win" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/18/massive-layoffs-focus-family-after-prop-8-win</id>
    <published>2008-11-19T08:00:00-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-11-19T08:37:23-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Cara DeGette</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Election 2008" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="STI/HIV/AIDS Prevention" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="anti-gay initiatives" />
    <category term="Focus on the Family" />
    <category term="LGBT issues" />
    <category term="marriage equality" />
    <category term="proposition 8" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Focus on the Family announced major layoffs to its Colorado Springs-based ministry yesterday. The cutbacks come just weeks after the group pumped more than half a million dollars into the successful effort to pass a gay-marriage ban in California.    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>
Focus on the Family announced major layoffs to its
Colorado Springs-based ministry and media empire yesterday, totaling 202 jobs cut companywide. The cutbacks
come just weeks after the group pumped more than half a million dollars
into the successful effort to pass a gay-marriage ban in California. Initial reports bring the total number of remaining employees to around 950. 
</p>
<p>
Critics are holding up the layoffs, which come just two months after
the organization's last round of dismissals, as a sad commentary on the
true priorities of the ministry.
</p>
<p>
&quot;If I were their membership I would be appalled,&quot; said Mark Lewis, a
longtime Colorado Springs activist who helped organize a Proposition 8
protest in Colorado Springs on Saturday. &quot;That [Focus on the Family]
would spend any money on anything that's obviously going to get blocked
in the courts is just sad. [Prop. 8] is guaranteed to lose, in the long
run it doesn't have a chance - it's just a waste of money.&quot;
</p>
<p>
In all, Focus pumped $539,000 in cash and another $83,000 worth of
non-monetary support into the measure to overturn a California Supreme
Court ruling that allowed gays and lesbians to marry in that state. The
group was the seventh-largest donor to the effort in the country. The
cash contributions are equal to the salaries of 19 Coloradans earning
the 2008 per capita income of $29,133.
</p>
<p>
In addition <a href="http://www.coloradoconfidential.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=2892">Elsa Prince, the auto parts heiress</a>
and longtime funder of conservative social causes who sits on the Focus
on the Family board, contributed another $450,000 to Prop. 8.
</p>
<p>
&quot;They should do more with their half-million dollars than spending
it to collect signatures to take the rights away from a class of
people,&quot; said Fred Karger, the founder of the anti-Prop 8 group <a href="http://californiansagainsthate.com/">Californians Against Hate</a>. &quot;I think it's wrong and it's hurtful to so many Americans.&quot;
</p>
<p>
In addition to promoting socially conservative issues such
opposition to abortion and gay rights, and supporting abstinence-only
education, the evangelical Christian ministry is a purveyor of
Christian books, CDs and DVDs. Two months ago, citing Wal-Mart and
online retailers as having cut into its product market, <a href="http://coloradoindependent.com/9794/focus-on-the-family-to-downsize">Focus announced that 46 employees would be laid off</a>
from its distribution department. Late Friday, Focus spokesman Gary
Schneeberger confirmed that more layoffs are in store, but said the
ministry will not release details until Monday afternoon. Schneeberger
hinted that some programs may be eliminated entirely, but declined to
elaborate.
</p>
<p>
&quot;We're going to need to talk to our own family first,&quot; he said. &quot;We need to respect the people who are affected.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Schneeberger also refused to discuss the funding priorities that
Focus made this fall, including pumping money and in-kind contributions
into Proposition 8.
</p>
<p>
This is the third year that Focus has laid off employees due to
budget cuts. In its heyday, the ministry, which relocated to Colorado
Springs from Arcadia, Calif., in 1991, employed more than 1,500 people.
Many of those employees worked in mailroom and line assembly jobs,
processing so much incoming and outgoing correspondences that the U.S.
Postal Service gave Focus its own ZIP code.
</p>
<p>
In September 2005, <a href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4191/is_/ai_n15620318">nearly 80 employees were reassigned</a>
or laid off in an effort to trim millions of dollars from its 2006
budget. In addition, 83 open positions were not filled in the layoff,
which included eliminating some of the ministry's programs. At the
time, Focus employed 1,342 full-time employees.
</p>
<p>
&quot;To the extent that we can place them within the ministry, we will
try to do that,&quot; said then-spokesman Paul Hetrick. &quot;Most of them will
not be able to be placed.&quot;
</p>
<p>
In September 2007, amid a <a href="http://www.coloradoconfidential.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=C7EC714FF0F2E30AF898F3A4A90AD98B?diaryId=2744">reported $8 million in budget shortfalls, Focus on the Family laid off another 30 employees</a>;
15 more were reassigned within the company. Most of the layoffs were
from Focus' constituent response services department (i.e. the
mailroom).
</p>
<p>
At the time, Schneeberger, who had replaced Hetrick, said that
giving was actually up by $1 million during the fiscal year. However, a
very &quot;aggressive&quot; budget goal of $150 million did not materialize.
</p>
<p>
In a statement issued this September, marking the end of the ministry's fiscal year, <a href="http://www.gazette.com/articles/focus_43380___article.html/family_layoffs.html">Chief Operating Officer Glenn Williams weighed in on the additional layoffs of 46 people</a>.
</p>
<p>
&quot;It is certainly heartbreaking that in this case fulfilling that
duty means having to say goodbye to some members of our Focus family,
but industry realities really leave us no alternative,&quot; he note in his
statement. &quot;We are accountable to our donors to spend their money in
the most cost-effective and productive manner possible.&quot;
</p>
<p>
But Lewis, the Colorado Springs activist, wonders whether the
families who donate to the nonprofit ministry, realize where their
funds really end up.
</p>
<p>
&quot;Seriously, I would imagine their supporters have got to be asking
the question about whether their church is really practicing their
theology.&quot;
</p>
<p>
For Lewis, who is straight, the issue boils down to the significance
of targeting a class of citizens for exclusion, at the expense of the
families that the ministry could be helping - in this case their own
employees.
</p>
<p>
Lewis likened Proposition 8 to Colorado's Amendment 2, the 1992
anti-gay measure that was designed to prohibit gays and lesbians from
seeking legal protections. Colorado voters approved the measure, which
was marketed by proponents, including Focus on the Family, as an effort
to prohibit gays and lesbians from seeking &quot;special rights.&quot; The U.S.
Supreme Court stuck down the measure as unconstitutional four years
later.
</p>
<p>
&quot;You can't make homosexuals second class citizens - we've learned
that already,&quot; Lewis said. &quot;People will look back on this and see how
absurd it is.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Days before this year's election, Focus founder James Dobson
appeared at a closing rally at Qualcomm Stadium in San Diego to rally
the anti-gay troops.
</p>
<p>
Karger of Californians Against Hate, termed the rally a &quot;big bust.&quot;
Organizers promised that more than 70,000 supporters would show up; the
final tally was close to 10,000, he said.
</p>
<p>
Yet three days later, California voters approved the measure with 52
percent of the vote. While the measure will certainly head back to
court, California has become the 31st state in the country to pass
measures that define marriage as being between a man and woman only. In
all, Proposition 8 has proven to be the most expensive social issue in
the country, with more than $73 million pumped into the cause from both
sides. One of the larger contributors to the anti-Prop. 8 efforts was
Colorado gay philanthropist Tim Gill, who contributed $720,000 to
oppose the measure.
</p>
<p>
&quot;I'm very disturbed by organizations from out of state like Focus on
the Family,&quot; Karger said. &quot;They came in early to make sure the measure
got on ballot; they've got muscle and they are out to hurt a lot of
people and destroy a lot of lives.&quot;
</p>    ]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Larry Liston Joins &quot;Sluts&quot;-Slinging Brigade</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/02/11/larry-liston-joins-sluts-slinging-brigade" />
    <id>http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/02/11/larry-liston-joins-sluts-slinging-brigade</id>
    <published>2008-02-11T08:36:11-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-02-11T08:59:19-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Cara DeGette</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Contraception" />
    <category term="Sexuality Education" />
    <category term="Women’s Rights" />
    <category term="adolescent parenting" />
    <category term="shaming" />
    <category term="teen pregnancy" />
    <category term="teen sexuality" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[  <p>Colorado state Rep. Larry Liston isn't the only elected official in the state to dispense the epithet "slut" against teen parents -- he joins the ranks of two other El Paso County Republicans.</p>      ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[  <p>With one offensive, four-letter word, Colorado state <a href="http://www.coloradoconfidential.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1731" rel="nofollow">Rep. Larry Liston</a> has seamlessly joined the ranks of two fellow El Paso County Republicans, notably former Commissioner Betty Beedy, who called single mothers who date &quot;sluts,&quot; and former state Sen. MaryAnne Tebedo, who outraged people of color when she went on television and claimed their &quot;culture&quot; encourages sexual promiscuity for girls. </p>
<p>Apparently trying his darndest to distance himself from his own slur, Liston, who announced last Saturday his intent to run for a third term in November, spent at least part of Thursday making sure that everyone knew that he didn&#39;t quite mean what he said when talking about &quot;sluts&quot;  on Wednesday.</p>
<p> The Colorado Springs Gazette <a href="http://www.gazette.com/articles/colorado_32819___article.html/health_liston.html" rel="nofollow">first reported</a> on Liston&#39;s comment, made during a Wednesday GOP caucus lunch when a group was delivering a report that included Colorado&#39;s high teen pregnancy rate.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;In my parents&#39; day and age, they were sent away, they were shunned, they were called what they are. There was at least a sense of shame,&quot; Liston said.
<p> &quot;There&#39;s no sense of shame today. Society condones it. . . . I think it&#39;s wrong. They&#39;re sluts. And I don&#39;t mean just the women. I mean the men, too.&quot;</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p> Immediately Rep. Stella Garza Hicks, a fellow El Paso County Republican, told a reporter she was offended. And by Thursday, after Liston&#39;s comments had been widely circulated -- from a women&#39;s room at the Capitol to the Drudge Report -- the lawmaker, who graduated high school in 1970, informed reporters he was &quot;definitely sorry&quot; for his &quot;derogatory term.&quot;</p>
<p> &quot;I certainly could&#39;ve used different words,&quot; he said.</p>
<p> And,</p>
<p> &quot;I had no intention of offending anybody. That was not my intent all - never was, never has been.&quot;</p>
<p> But Liston&#39;s &quot;slut&quot; application -- and suggestion the pregnant girls should be &quot;shamed&quot; into hiding -- conjured up, at least for some Coloradans and certainly residents of El Paso County, memories of former county Commissioner Beedy.</p>
<p> The outspoken Republican, in office from 1996 to 2000, first raised a stink when she declared that single mothers who date are &quot;sluts.&quot; She went on to stridently oppose naming a stretch of concrete highway in El Paso County after civil rights hero Martin Luther King Jr., claiming he was nothing better than a philanderer.</p>
<p> Beedy then boycotted -- on moral grounds -- a statewide gathering of county commissioners, who were meeting in the mountain town of Crested Butte. The town and ski area, she claimed, informally endorses a &quot;ski naked&quot; day in the winter.</p>
<p> The commissioner&#39;s saucy tongue generated such controversy that she eventually was invited to appear on &quot;The View,&quot; where she informed her slack-jawed interviewer, Starr Jones, an African-American woman, and the rest of the nationwide TV viewing audience that only white people are &quot;normal.&quot;</p>
<p> As for former state Sen. Tebedo, who left office in 2000 - well, she was also well known for her gaffes. In addition to her televised claim that minority culture &quot;encourages sexual promiscuity for girls,&quot; Tebedo did offer up one bit of encouraging news about teens and sex -- and certainly something Rep. Liston might keep in mind:</p>
<p> It&#39;s a fact, Tebedo once told her colleagues, that the incidence of teen pregnancy &quot;drops off significantly after age 25.&quot;</p>      ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
